Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to suggest that every single parent with a child at private school apply for a state school place asap?

1000 replies

sarjd · 05/06/2024 15:12

let's see how that works.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
DuchessNope · 06/06/2024 16:24

There won’t be many schools where a fee increase allows you to leave without the required notice. Schools put their fees up frequently.

CelesteCunningham · 06/06/2024 16:27

Situaatom · 06/06/2024 13:26

@CelesteCunningham well, given those who send to private are also funding the state then yes, you’re right, it should.

That's what I said. Every child has the right to a state education.

CelesteCunningham · 06/06/2024 16:28

Nevercloserfortherestofourlives · 06/06/2024 15:35

Well of course they should. Do you think they shouldn’t ?

I don't. I was being sincere. Every child is entitled to a state education.

I mean, those who know me IRL know I'm sarcastic more often than not but I'm surprised I've had to clarify that I meant this sincerely three times now.

Araminta1003 · 06/06/2024 16:29

A court might say that, but this is an anomalous situation in the private sector. It has never happened before. If the Government said tomorrow that all private school children must now dye their hair blue by law, I am pretty sure an English court would exempt private school children from paying fees in lieu of notice.

LiveAtVillaVillekulla · 06/06/2024 16:29

Aladdinzane · 06/06/2024 15:31

@PrinnyPree

I agree, just look at all the threads here and media attention that is given to an issue which impacts a tiny and privileged majority.

Imagine if the people who can make this much noise and wield this much influence were fighting for better state education?

Quite. And imagine what could happen if the many millions of clever state school parents fought for better education?
It's possible you know. Have you been to the countries where they've actually done that? State/private education is a total non issue there.

CelesteCunningham · 06/06/2024 16:30

Silverstarfish1 · 05/06/2024 22:26

@ CelesteCunningham - Your post is incredibly disrespectful - children who have places in private schools have not cost the state anything to date as the parents have shouldered that cost ( in addition to paying NI and thereby contributing to paying for children in state schools). Lots of parents don’t fall into the rich category that seems to offend you, but have managed to pay for a place through hard work and sacrifice to try provide the best opportunity in their opinion for their children. Now the cost of that is being proposed to be hiked unfairly by a further 20%. Rather than sort out proper funding for schools and raising the overall standard of state schools first which would reduce the need/ demand for these private schools - Labour is going to screw those parents who can just afford it and force them back into a state school system which will then be further strained with the influx without addressing the issues of teacher shortage/ being underfunded, large classes, poor SEN provision etc etc - yes well done Labour- lets target those families - it would be interesting to see how many of them went to private schools and how many of their kids are going to them.

Only seeing this now @Silverstarfish1 as you didn't format the tag correctly. I'm not sure which of my posts you think is disrespectful? Smile

Araminta1003 · 06/06/2024 16:31

And every private school parent applying for a state place now due to this will have to incur fees in lieu of notice, if a court holds that. Because of the way that private school contracts are drafted. On that basis alone, it would be utterly unreasonable for the Labour Party to bring this policy in from September 2024.

It will also be unreasonable to bring it in from January 2025 because children moving to the state sector won’t be in the state sector budget so will cost the state.

Shinyandnew1 · 06/06/2024 16:38

IvyIvyIvy · 06/06/2024 16:03

Anyone who can't afford a fee increase due to vat should definitely register their interest for a state school place this September. Mr starmer would then have the actual statistics to work with rather than making it up as he goes along. It's certainly a good idea if you can't afford 20 percent more in the new school year - your child should continue their education and it's the government's responsibility to find a suitable place and fund it.

Edited

You can’t ’register an interest’ in a school place. If you have a child starting yR or y7, you apply via admissions in the autumn and will them be allocated a place in the following spring, which you accept or decline.

Or you have a child in a different year group, you apply via admissions and they will offer you a place if there is one, which you’ll need to accept or decline in eg 10-14 days.

Araminta1003 · 06/06/2024 16:41

“Quite. And imagine what could happen if the many millions of clever state school parents fought for better education?”

But we do, in our own schools. For our own children. And as they then to be privileged schools our DCs are getting a good education, in the state sector.

YourPinkDog · 06/06/2024 16:47

Araminta1003 · 06/06/2024 16:31

And every private school parent applying for a state place now due to this will have to incur fees in lieu of notice, if a court holds that. Because of the way that private school contracts are drafted. On that basis alone, it would be utterly unreasonable for the Labour Party to bring this policy in from September 2024.

It will also be unreasonable to bring it in from January 2025 because children moving to the state sector won’t be in the state sector budget so will cost the state.

It is none of the government's business what private organisations do as long as they follow the law.

samarrange · 06/06/2024 16:48

Saschka · 05/06/2024 21:55

Conservative Central HQ, I think.

Conservative Campaign HQ. Formerly known as Conservative Central Office.

Araminta1003 · 06/06/2024 16:52

“It is none of the government's business what private organisations do as long as they follow the law.”

That may be so. Equally, it is the judiciary’s business to hold the Executive to account when making laws, in particular, any laws that may be discriminatory. Whilst they won’t involve themselves with pure taxation matters, where it is a question of discrimination, in any shape or form, they most definitely have an interest.

Menopausalprincess · 06/06/2024 17:15

YourPinkDog · 06/06/2024 14:11

You know parents of SEN children at state schools and home educating have already been fighting? It is the Tory government cuts that have been the issue. But the private school parents have not given a shit, and they still will not if they get their vat exception.

We have our (non SEN) kids at private school, and we make a monthly contribution to a local special school. Why does everyone assume that families with kids in private school don’t also make a significant contribution to their community?

YourPinkDog · 06/06/2024 17:17

@Araminta1003 not wanting to pay a tax does not make it discriminatory under protected characteristics.
Unless the government has changed the law to make one of those protected characteristics rich people?

Shortfatsuit · 06/06/2024 17:20

Araminta1003 · 06/06/2024 16:22

Parents might be able to argue “force majeure” depending on the definition. Unforeseeable act, beyond their control… which this very much is, with no real notice given.

It has been Lablur Party policy for several years. Labour has been polling pretty well for quite a long time. And we have all known that there would have to be a general election pretty soon. So I am not really sure that anyone could argue that the increase had come as a surprise to them?

Most private school families I know have been planning around the expected increase for quite a while.

Shortfatsuit · 06/06/2024 17:21

YourPinkDog · 06/06/2024 17:17

@Araminta1003 not wanting to pay a tax does not make it discriminatory under protected characteristics.
Unless the government has changed the law to make one of those protected characteristics rich people?

The Tories appear to have missed a trick with that one.

Zyq · 06/06/2024 17:32

SanctusInDistress · 05/06/2024 22:04

If you are in the UK, can we please use ‘waiting list’ and not ‘wait list’. Schools in the UK have a waiting list. Ta very much m’lords and m’ladies.

Thank you! Couldn't agree more.

Zyq · 06/06/2024 17:36

EasternStandard · 05/06/2024 22:13

Of course. You are an electoral prop

Not many want to be. I don’t see others on the thread saying yes I’ll take a 20% tax for Starmer’s polling

It’s someone else, that’s great

Not that it will do much, maybe negative

It's not a 20% tax on everything, though, is it? It's a tax on one area of non-compulsory spending, for the limited period in anyone's life when they have children in school.

Araminta1003 · 06/06/2024 17:37

There are private schools with a high proportion of children with SEN. Relying on just EHCP may well end up being discriminatory,

Zyq · 06/06/2024 17:39

Daisyb1080 · 05/06/2024 22:22

Do people realise that people who send their children to independent schools do have the same right to a place at state school and that by paying to educate their child elsewhere actually frees up money for the state school children ? Effectively they are paying twice so yes if they put this ridiculous plan in motion then they have to find room for all the children since labour have messed them up. Literally the stupidest both divisive policy I’ve ever come across.

It doesn't free up a penny in any given state school. They get funded strictly according to the number on the roll, therefore the more who come in from private schools the better - particularly given that rolls are falling.

Araminta1003 · 06/06/2024 17:39

@Shortfatsuit - Labour “policy” means zilch. The sudden tax coming into force could be force majeure. They are not even in power yet. For now, it’s all speculation.

wombat15 · 06/06/2024 17:39

Araminta1003 · 06/06/2024 16:22

Parents might be able to argue “force majeure” depending on the definition. Unforeseeable act, beyond their control… which this very much is, with no real notice given.

How private schools increasing their fees be considered and an "unforeseeabale act"?

jeaux90 · 06/06/2024 17:43

Fuck no. No way am I putting my SEN kid in the local state school.

I would rather eat beans for the next few years.

I am resigned to the extra cost.

IvyIvyIvy · 06/06/2024 17:45

wombat15 · 06/06/2024 16:10

Just registering an interest wouldn't demonstrate anything if parents are going to do it regardless of whether they really are interested. Parents will be offered a place in a currently undersubscribed school. The statistics will only be interesting if students start at those schools.

But they will start at those schools if labour comes in

Zyq · 06/06/2024 17:50

alwaysraining123 · 05/06/2024 22:42

Ask your school about paying fees in advance. Lots of private schools near me are planning to allow parents to pay in advance to avoid paying VAT at all. They’ve also said they’ll not be passing on VAT in full anyway by reducing the number of bursaries going forward (not affecting the children already at the school). There’s also some local community events they’ll be cancelling to recoup some costs.

Fascinating that private schools are "threatening" to cover this by taking away help from children who need bursaries, and stopping community support. So selfless of them. Why aren't they economising by, say, reducing the hours they use the swimming pool, having one less expensive concert or other production per year, putting off redecoration plans, turning the thermostat down, raising class sizes so they can cut down on staff, cancelling the governors' social, etc etc?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.