Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to LOATHE the word "Situationship"?

63 replies

PyongyangKipperbang · 15/05/2024 00:40

Its nonsensical!

Surely its "Going out with...."

So you have Dating ( going on dates, maybe sleeping together but not exclusive), then Going Out With (not living together,but not seeing other people and developing/developed feelings), then Relationship (for me this is more than 6 months but less than 2 years because...) then Long Term Relationship (whether living together/married or not).

Its a bloody stupid word. To me it would mean, if I had to define it, people who have been in a LTR but have to stay in their current arrangement for practical reasons, such a cant afford to run two homes or their house wont sell or similar. The first few times I read it, I assumed that that was what it meant and had to Google it.

Probably going to be told IABU but it really bugs me!

OP posts:
BusyMintCrab · 15/05/2024 10:35

YABU and I suspect you have not had the pleasure of dating recently 🥲

beatrix1234 · 15/05/2024 10:39

DeeCeeCherry · 15/05/2024 00:55

Its a stupid word and I cringe when I hear it. Normally means theyre having sex with someone and filled with angst because they want commitment but their sex partner doesn't. & they can't accept that. Its right up there with grown men and women actually writing "It's Complicated" as their FB status.

I don’t find it cringe at all, I define “situationship” as a relationship that can’t be define with the usual terms (dating, boyfriend, lover or partner).

msbevvy · 15/05/2024 10:44

This has made me feel really past it. I have never even heard of the word.

Scallops · 15/05/2024 10:50

I'd never use the word, but I think it can be useful.

Eg. I have a situationship (argh cringe) with a man who is much too young for what I'm really looking for, which is marriage, but we like each other and hang out and sometimes have sex. It will end when one/both of us finds an appropriate person for a real relationship.

5128gap · 15/05/2024 10:54

It fills a gap for people with situations that don't fall within any of your boxes. Often used by people who themselves either don't know how to describe the thing, maybe they're unsure, or being kept guessing; or who feel uncomfortable with the other terms because they don't quite fit. If there was no call for it, I suppose it wouldn't have become part of the language.

Alittlefrustrated · 15/05/2024 10:58

Never heard it before. Seems like nonsense to me. As does "exclusive". I'd expect anyone asking me out on dates to only be dating me. But then again, I'm 55 - we "went out" in my youth, and my parents word "courting" was cringy. I feel a lot if these words are get out clauses for cheats and users.

CheekyHobson · 15/05/2024 10:59

I read “situationship” (or “It’s Complicated”) as “I have poor boundaries / low self-esteem”.

Pieceofpurplesky · 15/05/2024 10:59

Beefcurtains79 · 15/05/2024 07:01

Why would you hate the word ‘exclusive’?
How bizarre.

@OfcourseitsaNC sums it up perfectly.

If you are in a relationship then being exclusive should be the norm!

sammylady37 · 15/05/2024 11:03

OfcourseitsaNC · 15/05/2024 06:12

I agree. It's a stupid word.

But you've missed out so many options @PyongyangKipperbang 🤣

By your definition, I'm in a LTR with my FWB. I'm really not, as it's not exclusive (another word I hate) and the word relationship implies we have commitment to each other. We don't. We hang out to have fun and have sex.

I tell people "The man I'm seeing..." Suitably vague.

I refer to them as my gentlemen callers 😃

TheCatJumps · 15/05/2024 11:10

AngeloMysterioso · 15/05/2024 06:12

This is how I’ve always thought of it too. A relationship (not necessarily romantic) that is driven mainly by the situation around it.

Yes, this. But it can be applicable to sexual relationships that are similarly dependent on circumstances/situations. Like aeons ago (long before the term was coined), I had a friend who lived nearby, and we slept together on a fairly regular basis when we were both single (FWB, but again, before the term existed). When I moved to a different part of London, the sex stopped, because it would have taken us an hour or more to travel to one another, though we’re still friends, and he came to my wedding.

Verv · 15/05/2024 11:11

This is the first time I've heard it, and I hate it.

Verv · 15/05/2024 11:12

In a situationship with a fella and going on hollibobs with his famalam.

Get out.

OfcourseitsaNC · 15/05/2024 11:15

Verv · 15/05/2024 11:12

In a situationship with a fella and going on hollibobs with his famalam.

Get out.

Internally screaming 🤣🤣🤣

RedPony1 · 15/05/2024 11:16

Agix · 15/05/2024 07:26

I thought situationship meant a sort of non-commital relationship, half romantic in nature, but with a bunch of angst and upset and confusion involved. Usually when one likes the other and would be with them, but the other just wants sex/attention, but hasn't exactly been open about that fact - yet continues to accept or invite the sex and attention. So they're just stuck in this weird limbo not going anywhere - cant really be described as "going out".

Looking at these posts, looks like I'm wrong 🤣

This is exactly how anybody i know would describe the word!!

I don't mind the term at all, but sad for anybody in one

KimberleyClark · 15/05/2024 11:16

Pieceofpurplesky · 15/05/2024 10:59

@OfcourseitsaNC sums it up perfectly.

If you are in a relationship then being exclusive should be the norm!

I agree, but it’s all so complicated nowadays. I do think friends with benefits/fuck buddy situations are rarely completely even - more often than not one wants to be in a proper relationship and the other doesn’t.

beatrix1234 · 15/05/2024 11:30

CheekyHobson · 15/05/2024 10:59

I read “situationship” (or “It’s Complicated”) as “I have poor boundaries / low self-esteem”.

casual relationships can be convenient and not everyone wants to get into a “serious relationship” with someone they’re having sex. By Stating that casual relationships are a sign of low self esteem you’re making a point that sex should only be conducive to marriage or monogamy. You must be religious, naive or quite narrow minded.

Scallops · 15/05/2024 11:48

When I was happily married I felt so sorry for people having to go on the apps etc. and the idea of casual sex at my age repulsed me (no judgement of anyone else at all).

I've now been single 7 years and I only want a serious relationship leading to marriage (a happy one this time). But good single middle aged men are hard to find. If I didn't have the occasional fwb/"situationship" I'd never have sex. I've gone 2-3 years without it at a time and it's just awful and the hopelessness just grows.

Sorry for the ramble but I wanted to explain why, although it's very far from ideal for me, I will sometimes have casual sex. I'd rather meet a lovely man today to be with for the rest of my life.

Scallops · 15/05/2024 11:49

P.S. I thought I was happily married! Was in denial.

usernother · 15/05/2024 11:51

SwedishEdith · 15/05/2024 00:58

I quite like it and am surprised it's taken this long to become a word. It seems so obvious now it exists even though I'm not sure when it's meant to be used. I'd assume it's that stage when you're not quite sure if you're in a relationship yet. Or an affair.

We used to say you were 'seeing' someone before you'd been out enough times to move to the 'going out with' stage.

SabreIsMyFave · 15/05/2024 15:53

Agree @PyongyangKipperbang 'Situationship' is a stupid word. I hate it too!

Neverdo · 15/05/2024 16:09

I don't think it's a word I'd use out loud, but it does sum up that situation where you're "involved" with someone, would quite like it to go somewhere, know it won't, but also don't want to walk away.

Neverdo · 15/05/2024 16:11

I don't think it's the same as "going out with" or "seeing someone". They both suggest early days of a realtionship that may develop.

A situationship is something far less posituve/healthy IMO.

CheekyHobson · 15/05/2024 18:14

beatrix1234 · 15/05/2024 11:30

casual relationships can be convenient and not everyone wants to get into a “serious relationship” with someone they’re having sex. By Stating that casual relationships are a sign of low self esteem you’re making a point that sex should only be conducive to marriage or monogamy. You must be religious, naive or quite narrow minded.

Edited

No, you’re quite wrong. I have no issue with casual relationships, but the term “situationship” to me implies that one party wants more than they are getting yet are hanging around anyway.

For casual relationships where everyone is on board with them not going anywhere, we have the terms FWB or fuck buddies.

DeeCeeCherry · 15/05/2024 18:50

Verv
In a situationship with a fella and going on hollibobs with his famalam
Get out
😂

Perfectpots · 15/05/2024 18:59

Indeed. Only ever heard it spoken of by a 21 yr old friend of my DCs. She was regailing ppl with her love /sex life. 😒

Swipe left for the next trending thread