Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think if a pharmacist refuses to dispense medication due to religious or personal beliefs

313 replies

Soubriquet · 24/04/2024 10:11

They shouldn’t be a pharmacist.

I mean, the morning after pill is healthcare. Your personal or religious beliefs shouldn’t come into this.

OP posts:
SeanBeansMealDeal · 24/04/2024 15:15

TheLadyofShalotts · 24/04/2024 14:53

No, for 2 reasons.

  1. because the group of people they will prescribe to are those who have a medical condition it is effective for- it isn’t based on a philosophical viewpoint or a belief system. They also wouldn’t give it to a woman who was 8 months pregnant or had had a radical hysterectomy because they don’t need it, they can’t get pregnant.

  2. Female sex people can change their gender and have that recognised by the government gender recognition certificate, therefore becoming male in legal terms and still be given the MAP- therefore ‘men’ can get MAP.

I take your first point; but with the second, we're back in the circle of faith-based beliefs that are sincerely held by some but very much not by others - which is where this question all began.

WarshipRocinante · 24/04/2024 15:17

BIossomtoes · 24/04/2024 15:10

What’s the difference between this and a gynaecologist refusing to perform abortion on moral grounds? I can’t see the problem, it’s not as if there’s a shortage of pharmacies.

I actually think it’s different. A gynaecologist isn’t front line; you book in to see your GP or go to a family planning/sexual health clinic/call up your local NHS abortion self referral number. You’ll be referred to the correct service and to a doctor who will perform an abortion or give the abortion pill. So, any gynaecologists who don’t do abortion won’t even factor in; they won’t be asked, they won’t be standing in front of the patient saying, “no, go somewhere else,” because the patient won’t end up in front of them.

It is a much bigger problem with front line staff when there isn’t an easily accepted alternative. Small towns or villages with one pharmacists and no alternative for miles is a very different situation.

VestibuleVirgin · 24/04/2024 15:19

They can refuse;
GPhC guidelines which allow pharmacists to refuse to dispense medication that goes against their personal beliefs if there is adequate alternative care available for the patient.

Nurses can also refuse to participate in terminations

BIossomtoes · 24/04/2024 15:21

WarshipRocinante · 24/04/2024 15:17

I actually think it’s different. A gynaecologist isn’t front line; you book in to see your GP or go to a family planning/sexual health clinic/call up your local NHS abortion self referral number. You’ll be referred to the correct service and to a doctor who will perform an abortion or give the abortion pill. So, any gynaecologists who don’t do abortion won’t even factor in; they won’t be asked, they won’t be standing in front of the patient saying, “no, go somewhere else,” because the patient won’t end up in front of them.

It is a much bigger problem with front line staff when there isn’t an easily accepted alternative. Small towns or villages with one pharmacists and no alternative for miles is a very different situation.

The detail is different. The principle is exactly the same. I’m very happy that people are able to make moral choices in their professional lives. The alternative is very dangerous.

meditrina · 24/04/2024 15:28

TulipCat · 24/04/2024 10:20

I agree. If we start picking and choosing which medical treatments we are personally comfortable dispensing, where does that go in terms of discrimination I wonder?

It doesn't go anywhere.

All HCPs can opt out of the provision of contraceptive services or abortion services. They cannot opt out of anything else. This is long-standing explicit policy and there has been no "creep"

But they must signpost where they are available, and the local trust must make sure that services are available across its patch.

meditrina · 24/04/2024 15:51

BIossomtoes · 24/04/2024 15:10

What’s the difference between this and a gynaecologist refusing to perform abortion on moral grounds? I can’t see the problem, it’s not as if there’s a shortage of pharmacies.

It's not as if there's a shortage of pharmacies

Three in four pharmacies experiencing a pharmacist shortage, MPs told - The Pharmacist

Plus about 160 pharmacies have closed completely in the last 2 years.

TheLadyofShalotts · 24/04/2024 16:03

SeanBeansMealDeal · 24/04/2024 15:15

I take your first point; but with the second, we're back in the circle of faith-based beliefs that are sincerely held by some but very much not by others - which is where this question all began.

Yeah- I don’t agree you are a man if you say you are and get a certificate from the government, but as far as I understand it legally you are therefore someone who is a man for terms of legal protection can be given the map.

TheLadyofShalotts · 24/04/2024 16:04

QueenOfTheLabyrinth · 24/04/2024 15:03

But providing MAP is an OPTIONAL service for practitioners which is the part you’re missing, it is not or never has been mandatory.

The OPTION to get MAP OTC in pharmacies became available in 2001 but there is nothing to say a pharmacy has to be supply it, many just don’t stock it.

That’s true, but I’m talking about when they do decide to stock it.

Pickled21 · 24/04/2024 16:09

Seems like there is a pharmacist thread every week. Would be really useful if the op actually came back to the thread and explained if thos is something he or she has actually experienced or if it's a hypothetical plucked out of nowhere!

C8H10N4O2 · 24/04/2024 16:10

Snugglemonkey · 24/04/2024 12:59

You say that, but I do some work with victims of sexual and domestic violence. Some women are incredibly tightly controlled. I am at the very periphery, yet I have met several women who have had children because they could not access map or an abortion.

Perhaps a woman has taken risks to get to that chemist, perhaps this is her only chance. No, it is nit that common, but it should never, ever be allowed to happen.

Exactly this. Not every women is a well resourced, sharp elbowed and confident MNer.

The women who suffer in these situations are often those already at the bottom of the health heap. I've also known cases where women could not access MAP or an abortion due to personal religious beliefs overriding women's right to healthcare.

In the case of MAP I presume that those pharmacists with deeply held forced birther. religious beliefs also turn down payment for contraceptive prescriptions since women seeking MAP are not pregnant - they are trying to prevent a pregnancy occurring.

veilstone · 24/04/2024 16:12

FlexIt · 24/04/2024 14:09

@veilstone as explained above, they aren’t downing tools and refusing to do their jobs!
Some parts of their jobs are effectively optional including map, therefore they are opting not to do it.

How would we cope as a nation without the pharmacists and doctors who perform 99.99% of their other functions?

Most people of they refused to do part of their job they would be fired. I know I would. And it's not even something as important and time sensitive as giving someone the MAP.

I admit that it may not be feasible to change the rules due to a shortage of phaemacists, but the idea that someone can refuse to give someone medicine that they maybe can't practically get elsewhere in time, but knowing that they won't lose their job because it might leave a rural are without a pharmacy is horrible.

BIossomtoes · 24/04/2024 16:14

veilstone · 24/04/2024 16:12

Most people of they refused to do part of their job they would be fired. I know I would. And it's not even something as important and time sensitive as giving someone the MAP.

I admit that it may not be feasible to change the rules due to a shortage of phaemacists, but the idea that someone can refuse to give someone medicine that they maybe can't practically get elsewhere in time, but knowing that they won't lose their job because it might leave a rural are without a pharmacy is horrible.

You think your employer should own you? Well, I’m delighted that we ditched that kind of thinking a century ago.

WarshipRocinante · 24/04/2024 16:16

SeanBeansMealDeal · 24/04/2024 14:39

And what would the implantation very likely lead to if it weren't prevented...?

There is no pregnancy to end. The MAP is a contraception, not an abortion medication.

If you have sex whilst ovulating without a condom, you may end up pregnant. Without the pill or the implant or an IUD, you may end up pregnant. Would a pharmacist refuse to sell other contraceptives? No. They get in the way and prevent a pregnancy occurring, which would likely occur without them. Exactly the same as the MAP. You’ve had unprotected sex during ovulation so you take the MAP to prevent a pregnancy occurring, same as any other contraception.

QueenOfTheLabyrinth · 24/04/2024 16:20

Bushmillsbabe · 24/04/2024 14:55

I do get what you are saying, but surely that's better than the people saying 'they shouldn't work at all' - as you say there is a shortage of pharmacists.
But the risk to patients of not being ble to get the medicine they need also needs to be considered, and this risk would be mitigated by those with strong views working in a multi pharmacist venue, such as a large boots, a hospital pharmacy etc. It would be a balanced approach

I don’t think you understand how pharmacies work & that the vast majority of pharmacies are actually private businesses (exceptions usually being hospital pharmacies).

From Community Pharmacy England:

“A pharmacy can be registered only by a pharmacist, a partnership consisting entirely of pharmacists, or by a body corporate (usually a limited company). In the case of a body corporate, a superintendent pharmacist must be appointed, to take responsibility for the way in which the company carries out its professional pharmaceutical activities.”

So when we are talking about independent pharmacies & not the large chains (which is what you usually find in the rural locations people are talking about), the pharmacy is likely to be owned by the pharmacist themselves i.e. it is their business so no, you can’t just move them elsewhere & neither are they under any obligation to provide an OPTIONAL service if they don’t want to.

Let’s say a particular pharmacist is not the owner though but an employee instead & can somehow be moved, you’re assuming that there will be another pharmacist to take their place but in the arse end of nowhere, that’s extremely unlikely. What’s more likely is the pharmacy will have to close down as you can dispense without a qualified pharmacist on the premises & then no one gets their medications; you are thereby increasing the risk for a larger number of people not mitigating it & women are still not getting the MAP they need.

The current shortage of pharmacists mean you’re lucky if you can find one at all in certain areas, never mind having a large list to choose from.

C8H10N4O2 · 24/04/2024 16:22

SeanBeansMealDeal · 24/04/2024 14:30

Want to restrict female-only spaces and services to women and girls only, because of your 'bigoted belief' that a man who claims otherwise is NOT female...

This is such a bullshit comparison design to close down discussion on women's rights to health care.

Women are not being denied health care by the existence of women only spaces. Nor are men.

In terms of unevidenced religious belief - that would be gender ideology, not developmental biology.

C8H10N4O2 · 24/04/2024 16:25

BIossomtoes · 24/04/2024 16:14

You think your employer should own you? Well, I’m delighted that we ditched that kind of thinking a century ago.

But apparently its ok for the employer to deny women customers basic reproductive health care if they don't feel like it?

This blithe assumption that "other pharmacies are available" is simply not realistic and as ever its the most vulnerable women who can't exercise the option to "simply" travel to the next town.

ilikemethewayiam · 24/04/2024 16:26

My friend is a pharmacist and she said she can and does legally refuse to sell the morning after pill as it’s against her religion. I’ve had the same argument with her.

meditrina · 24/04/2024 16:28

WarshipRocinante · 24/04/2024 16:16

There is no pregnancy to end. The MAP is a contraception, not an abortion medication.

If you have sex whilst ovulating without a condom, you may end up pregnant. Without the pill or the implant or an IUD, you may end up pregnant. Would a pharmacist refuse to sell other contraceptives? No. They get in the way and prevent a pregnancy occurring, which would likely occur without them. Exactly the same as the MAP. You’ve had unprotected sex during ovulation so you take the MAP to prevent a pregnancy occurring, same as any other contraception.

Pharmacists can indeed opt out of all contraception services if they wish

BIossomtoes · 24/04/2024 16:29

But apparently it’s ok for the employer to deny women customers basic reproductive health care if they don't feel like it?

Yes it is. And there’s a legal exemption allowing them to do so. Would you be willing to work for an employer who compelled you to do something that went against your moral code?

PixieLaLar · 24/04/2024 16:32

@supercalifragilistic123

Termination/abortion care is as far as I know the only area of healthcare you are able to opt out of. I am OK with that because I'd rather not have somebody doing something they don't feel comfortable with.

But the morning after pill isn’t termination or abortion care. It’s preventing an unwanted pregnancy, therefore avoiding a possible abortion, so surely that is something they would support/encourage?

WarshipRocinante · 24/04/2024 16:33

ilikemethewayiam · 24/04/2024 16:26

My friend is a pharmacist and she said she can and does legally refuse to sell the morning after pill as it’s against her religion. I’ve had the same argument with her.

What about other forms of contraception? Are they against her religion? I assume she doesn’t use any contraception?

veilstone · 24/04/2024 16:33

BIossomtoes · 24/04/2024 16:29

But apparently it’s ok for the employer to deny women customers basic reproductive health care if they don't feel like it?

Yes it is. And there’s a legal exemption allowing them to do so. Would you be willing to work for an employer who compelled you to do something that went against your moral code?

If your job might make you do something that's against your moral code then don't take that job. Would it be okay for a vegetarian to work in a supermarket and not sell meat? Or someone who thinks drinking alcohol is wrong to get a job as a waiter and refuse to serve wine? Although these cases aren't quite as bad as they don't involve denying health care which may have a huge impact on the health and wellbeing of the woman involved.

WarshipRocinante · 24/04/2024 16:34

meditrina · 24/04/2024 16:28

Pharmacists can indeed opt out of all contraception services if they wish

Yes… but a lot don’t. My time is fine but the next town over has a pharmacy who won’t sell the MAP. They sell condoms though.

Baileyqueen · 24/04/2024 16:49

Pharmacies don’t have to offer emergency contraception, it is optional . Our local pharmacy has a sign up stating what services they offer. They should all do this really, saves awkward conversations all round.

FlexIt · 24/04/2024 16:50

@veilstone if your contract said you can optionally cover a shift every Saturday morning. Are you then refusing to do your job if you choose not to work Saturdays??
This is what map etc is equivalent to for pharmacists.