Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask if Million pound lottery winner who refuses to share money with partner should have shared?

189 replies

SweetBirdsong · 21/02/2024 13:17

I am surprised this isn't on here actually. It's been on the news for 2 days, and has just been discussed on Loose Women.

From the article...

A couple are waging war over a £1 million lotto scratchcard they ‘purchased together’ weeks before breaking up.

Michael Cartlidge, 39, and former partner Charlotte Cox, 37, purchased the
Lottery card together at a shop in Spalding, Lincs. But when Charlotte walked out on Michael a few weeks later, she was deemed to be the sole winner of the jackpot by lottery chiefs.

Michael admits that Charlotte both paid for and scratched the ticket. But he also claims that he was the one who suggested she buy the ticket and attempted to transfer her cash to cover the purchase while they were in the shop.
He says the mum-of-one initially agreed to split the cash, but later welched on the deal after breaking up with him a few weeks later and claimed she was the sole winner of the jackpot.

He said ‘£1million has never brought such misery.

So, was the woman (Charlotte) wrong to have kept all the money to herself? They were not married, they didn't own any property together or have joint finances, and they'd only been together 3 months. Lottery chiefs said she is the sole owner of the money and does not have to share it.

YABU - she was WRONG to keep the money and should have split it with him. They were 'a couple.' He didn't pay for the ticket, but they got it at the same time.

YANBU - she was RIGHT to keep it - as she paid for the ticket herself, and didn't need to share it. They'd only been together 3 months, they weren't married, and they didn't have a house together or joint finances.

https://metro.co.uk/2024/02/20/man-claims-ex-dumped-weeks-bought-winning-1-000-000-scratchcard-20311093/

Man claims ex dumped him weeks after they bought winning £1,000,000 scratchcard

'£1 million has never brought such misery.'

https://metro.co.uk/2024/02/20/man-claims-ex-dumped-weeks-bought-winning-1-000-000-scratchcard-20311093

OP posts:
LindaHamilton · 23/02/2024 00:27

If this was reverse gender the responses here be very different and the consensus would be the money should be split.

TheGreatGherkin · 23/02/2024 00:42

I remember a few years ago where a woman in Scotland IIRC won a few million on the lottery and her ex husband (they were divorced) tried to claim half. He wasn't entitled to a penny. I did laugh.

ThirtyThrillionThreeTrees · 23/02/2024 00:47

He's an absolute chancer. Not a hope he would have split it if it was the other way around. 3 months? He's having a laugh.

IfYourHorseSaysNo · 23/02/2024 00:50

LindaHamilton · 23/02/2024 00:27

If this was reverse gender the responses here be very different and the consensus would be the money should be split.

No. The reasons people think it is solely her winnings are because she bought the ticket and they had only been together for 5 minutes.

If they had been together 10 years, shared finances etc, I may think differently. Nothing to do with their gender sex.

HotChocolateNotCocoa · 23/02/2024 05:27

LindaHamilton · 23/02/2024 00:27

If this was reverse gender the responses here be very different and the consensus would be the money should be split.

After three months together? I disagree.

There is one big problem here, which is that posters have read about this man’s past and think they has a bearing on the outcome. It doesn’t. But I refuse to believe that people would side with a woman just because of her gender in this case. “I was also in the room” is a pretty pathetic defence, regardless of gender.

HotChocolateNotCocoa · 23/02/2024 05:29

Well unpopular opinion but it seems it was his idea and she bought them at his suggestion.

And? SHE won!

Riverlee · 23/02/2024 06:20

I recall that when the lottery was set up, syndicates (ie two ir more people) were advised to set up a contract. So st work, whenever we did a group entry, someone would print out a sheet which we would all sign to agree to sharing the winnings etc

YDBear · 23/02/2024 06:33

The one who paid for the ticket wins the prize. Unless all money within the family (I realize this isn't a family in this case) is communal--as it is in mine.

pokebowls · 23/02/2024 07:18

Depends. Did they say 'oooooo we should buy one' or did she just choose to buy one

Rainbowshit · 23/02/2024 08:00

Dibbydoos · 22/02/2024 19:53

There is sufficient evidence of him either attempting to or actually funding the ticket.

I get they can only pay one winner unless its a syndicate but she will need to share it with him.

I think she's being greedy tbh.

I'd get this in court and prevent her spending the money ASAP if I was him. He'll find a lawyer to help him for a cut of the proceeds...

The money was transferred AFTER he knew there had been a significant win. His story about the payment sounds like a lie as others have said, it doesn't try again 40 mins later.

T1Dmama · 23/02/2024 08:08

He attempted to transfer her a couple a quid?? Oh come on!!
He ‘encouraged her to buy it’… again ‘give over!’
If he’d wanted to buy one he’d have bought one too!
And let’s face it, if it was other way round I bet he’d have legged it with the money too… I think pretty much 99% of people would not share a million pound with someone they’d known 12 weeks!!

OneFrenchEgg · 23/02/2024 10:39

His story is the cctv shows him trying to transfer the money, the shop assistant recalls him doing this. My view is coloured by the people I see buying loads of cards and swapping teeny amounts of cash or discussing it.
Neither of them sound lovely, but I think they should split it.

TwylaSands · 23/02/2024 10:41

I wonder how often he went to the shops without a means to pay for anything.

Itsbeginingtolookalotlikexmas · 23/02/2024 11:01

He is violent scum so I don’t care if she morally owes him or not.

Hummusandstuff · 23/02/2024 11:05

Voted she should have shared before seeing the updates. Yep she should keep it and forget she ever met him. Not enough information really though.

peakygold · 23/02/2024 11:10

I'd offer him a sum, with an NDA and a restraining order just to keep his flappy mouth shut.

chiwwy · 23/02/2024 11:35

A judge would laugh him out of court. If he had the money to buy the scratchcard, why didn't he just buy it? Transferring such a small amount of money to his girlfriend to buy it when they were together just makes zero sense.

I hope she doesn't give the chancing prick a penny.

chiwwy · 23/02/2024 11:36

OneFrenchEgg · 23/02/2024 10:39

His story is the cctv shows him trying to transfer the money, the shop assistant recalls him doing this. My view is coloured by the people I see buying loads of cards and swapping teeny amounts of cash or discussing it.
Neither of them sound lovely, but I think they should split it.

Not sure how the cctv will show that. He may have just been looking at something on the phone.

The main thing is he didn't transfer the money or pay for the card.

Radioshark · 23/02/2024 18:10

She bought the ticket and it was her name on the back so it is her money.

Nanaof1 · 23/02/2024 18:17

If you try and transfer money, and it doesn't go through, does the app keep on trying or does one have to do it again?

YetMoreNewBeginnings · 23/02/2024 18:47

Nanaof1 · 23/02/2024 18:17

If you try and transfer money, and it doesn't go through, does the app keep on trying or does one have to do it again?

Not with any of the three banks I bank with. It either goes through or fails.

Phoenixfire1988 · 23/02/2024 23:30

He's also up in court for battering his ex so I'd say karma bit this c^nt in the arse

OneFrenchEgg · 24/02/2024 00:49

Radioshark · 23/02/2024 18:10

She bought the ticket and it was her name on the back so it is her money.

So if he had written his name on it what then?

YetMoreNewBeginnings · 24/02/2024 01:01

OneFrenchEgg · 24/02/2024 00:49

So if he had written his name on it what then?

She’d likely have been the one Camelot gave the money too after an investigation as she can prove she bought and paid for it.

Had she written both of their names on it he might have had a sniff…

Rottweilermummy · 24/02/2024 07:39

I've learned a lot from this post, I didn't know he was about to go on trial for assaulting a previous partner I didn't know he originally stole ticket from her, anf that they had only been together 3 months. Me being me before learning this info, was thinking what a cow to not share and then dump him 🤣
I think generally regardless of length of relationship , and 3 months in I would have felt quite settled and would have shared winnings, maybe not given them equal if I had bought ticket but definitely given them something

Swipe left for the next trending thread