Person A has been making lunch, including air fryer chips. They dish up, then realise they’ve given themself too many, so redistribute a bit and put the plates on the table.
Person B comes down for lunch. They turn their back for a second and when they turn round again they spot Person A removing a chip from their plate.
Person B is furious that A has been “sneaky” and stolen one of their rightful chips.
Person A argues that they’d overcorrected when dishing up and gave B a lot more, hence the chip removal.
Person B carries on seething for nearly 24 hours. They argue that they always give A the bigger portion, so why wouldn’t A do the same for them?
Person A says they do give B the bigger portion, that this was a minor rebalancing and until everyone’s actually sitting at the table, the food is still under the cook’s control.
Who is BU in this incredibly petty dispute?