Well…. I mean yes and no. I really don’t think a woman’s financial well-being should be based on who they marry and their partner’s inherited wealth.
And I also think that yes, people born before, say 1975 or so undoubtably had it good in some areas due to house price inflation, and were able to build a life in London specifically by benefiting from the 1990s…
…. but …
I really think it’s about choices.
I am slightly older than (I think) OP as I’m 40. I had a v similar background. I have had not a single penny from family.
I chose a career that I knew was highly paid because I knew I’d have to do everything myself financially (I met DH, also working class, at uni (UCL, so we did well academically) and he’s a teacher. We saved (all me!) for our first flat which was £180k with a 10% deposit right out in the edge of the central line in 2011. That went up… we had three kids and moved to a 5 bed house in (far away!) commuter countryside for £425k… no hand outs, all us(me!).
We still live there. It has more than doubled in value but that’s by the by… we don’t want to move.
We have enough monthly income to send three children to private school.
I have to wake early and commute but I have absolutely achieved the middle class lifestyle I decided to aspire for.
I had a stable home as a child and good family support for my education (Mum was a maths teacher) and I know that was a huge factor.
But I really do think that some of this comes down to comparison (no, I don’t have the private school middle class big house in NW3, but I do have it with a London career in a lovely spot …) and choices about standing on our own feet as women (I always worked full time for instance and retrieved to work when babies were 7/8 months). I never thought anyone other than me would need to provide life I wanted.
OP - I am a lawyer and therefore probably have a similar salary to what you could have in financial services. I say decide what you CAN achieve (I’m a partner in a law firm and couldn’t live in central London) and go for it!!!