Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think the reason why many Asylum seekers come to UK is...

247 replies

SmallBoats · 20/11/2023 09:00

a direct result of our imperialist past? People come to the UK in many instances because they are English speakers. English is widely spoken due to the massive British empire which used to exist. The British empire milked its territories, greatly increased its wealth despite causing massive human suffering in the process. The direct result of this is that English became a widely spoken language worldwide. It therefore isn't surprising many people seeking refuge from war torn countries try to get to the UK as they already speak English.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
ICanSeeMyHouseFromHere · 20/11/2023 11:39

Errr- French, Portuguese and Arabic are also widely spoken for all the same reasons as English depending on the African country you're talking about.. You just hear more about the English because you live in the Anglosphere

EasternStandard · 20/11/2023 11:42

Tapasita · 20/11/2023 11:30

Honestly though - if the Govt. really wanted to clamp down on illegal immigration they would. They would implement measures imposed by other EU countries - ID cards for a start. All this "Stop the Boat" nonsense is just a smokescreen. Sending people to Rwanda is not only an infringement on their human rights but it's also not effective in any case because you'd ideally just put in place restrictions and mandatory checks that made working illegally hard, if not impossible in the first place. The reason people want to come here is, as others have said, because they know they can just disappear underground. Stop that from being a possibility and you have less of an immigration problem to begin with

ID cards won’t do it.

They don’t stop the movement of people across the Med.

They’ll do about the same here

Cyclebabble · 20/11/2023 11:50

Most asylum seekers do not come from former parts of UK colonies. Even those that do come from former UK colonies come from countries which have been independent now for 50-60 years. I am supportive of us taking a reasonable number of asylum seekers but the number should be capped. I do not buy into us having responsibility for current woes of everyone worldwide. In the 17th and 18th centuries these countries would have been colonised by other European countries and would not have faired better. Current issues are caused largely by poor indigenous governments.

LakeTiticaca · 20/11/2023 12:02

Way too many virtue signallers in this country. We can't even deport violent convicted rapists without them wetting their knickers over their yuman rites.
Some people desperately need to get a grip

Oliotya · 20/11/2023 12:04

DownNative · 20/11/2023 11:38

Yes, but that in itself does not explain the scale and speed of the growth of the English language under global American dominance.

The United States has dominated in the areas of business and entertainment. 20th Century was the first time in history when languages could spread at breakneck speed.

It happened much slower in the 19th Century, for example.

And only 13 States were British colonies at the time. The United States expanded itself to 50 and spread the English language even further than when it was a British colony.

But that's all still a direct result of British imperialism.

kαλοκαλοκαιρι · 20/11/2023 12:05

orangegato · 20/11/2023 09:09

You serious, people that come here are clued up on imperialist history? Or is it for the soft arse policies and freebies maybe?

you have absolutely lost hold of yourself if you’ve allowed yourself to be tricked into believing the spiel about freebies. on another note i’ve a bridge i’d like to sell you.

Garlicnaan · 20/11/2023 12:07

hazelnutlatte · 20/11/2023 09:35

There are many reasons why refugees might prefer to be in the UK than other countries.
However- you have assumed that the UK receives more refugees than other countries and this is not true at all. We are not even in the top ten. The 3 countries with the most refugees are Turkey, Pakistan and Uganda. The top European country for refugees is Germany.
The UK is middle of the table of European countries. We are not taking more than our fair share.

Yes shame the OP didn't know this before posting.

Oliotya · 20/11/2023 12:07

LakeTiticaca · 20/11/2023 12:02

Way too many virtue signallers in this country. We can't even deport violent convicted rapists without them wetting their knickers over their yuman rites.
Some people desperately need to get a grip

Yeah, human rights are so overrated.

kαλοκαλοκαιρι · 20/11/2023 12:08

LakeTiticaca · 20/11/2023 12:02

Way too many virtue signallers in this country. We can't even deport violent convicted rapists without them wetting their knickers over their yuman rites.
Some people desperately need to get a grip

what has deporting violent criminals got to do with asylum seekers though? it’s not illegal to seek asylum.

Garlicnaan · 20/11/2023 12:09

whatamidealingwith · 20/11/2023 11:25

I've also volunteered with asylum seekers and second those posters that mentioned the underground economy. It is apparently far easier to fly under the radar in the UK and still build up a life/have good schooling for your kids/receive medical care in the UK than elsewhere in Europe.

Yes we have a huge black market / modern day slavery problem here unfortunately.

LakieLady · 20/11/2023 12:10

vivainsomnia · 20/11/2023 09:27

I thought that proportionally, the UK wasn't the largest destination of asylum seekers at all. A large proportion make their way to Turkey and stay there.

I do agree though that the language will certainly be a main drive to make it all the way to the UK.

The UK wasn't even in the top 10 last time I looked.

FarEast · 20/11/2023 12:15

Yes, they’re here, because we were there.

widowtwankywashroom · 20/11/2023 12:17

I would love to know how much the NHS pays for interpreting services every year

I've got no doubt they are sold a lie, but there's no getting away from the fact, NHS care is provided free, so are medications, so are interpretation services to asylum seekers, they haven't, like the majority paid in.

EasternStandard · 20/11/2023 12:18

FarEast · 20/11/2023 12:15

Yes, they’re here, because we were there.

Germany has high numbers of migrants / illegal migrants do people use this line for there too?

Plus ID cards. Showing how little they would do

Zamzamzamdeedah · 20/11/2023 12:19

Ace56 · 20/11/2023 09:18

I’d say this is probably true. Also I think people have a false idea of the UK, like they used to have of the US with the ‘American dream’. They think the UK is a kind of utopia where they can get free handouts and housing - we have a reputation of being more generous than other European countries.

Many still believe that it is like pre 2010 when you worked and even on NMW you could have ok life. As you say it was similar to the "American dream". News travel slow and as an immigrant to UK (just before 2010) I can hand on heart say that I would not be immigrating now because it is absolutely different state of affairs here. But lots of people don't know that and go by stories of quality of life on low salary long gone.

LakieLady · 20/11/2023 12:20

Pastlast · 20/11/2023 09:17

Yes the language is a big part of it would think but also agree we have a much bigger black market economy to work in than most Eu countries. We are not required to have ID cards either.

I think if the Government genuinely wanted to stop the boats they’d look at ID cards but that’s not politically palatable.

If the government genuinely wanted to stop the boats, they'd never have left the EU and lost the UK its right to return asylum seekers to the first safe EU country they passed through.

It's no coincidence that numbers have more than doubled since 2019 imo. If Brexiteers had bothered to educate themselves about EU immigration rules, they might have found out that "taking back control" of our borders gave us less control, not more.

LakeTiticaca · 20/11/2023 12:20

Oliotya · 20/11/2023 12:07

Yeah, human rights are so overrated.

You mean the rights of the victim?

therealcookiemonster · 20/11/2023 12:24

orangegato · 20/11/2023 09:09

You serious, people that come here are clued up on imperialist history? Or is it for the soft arse policies and freebies maybe?

which soft arsed policies and freebies would those be? do tell....

EasternStandard · 20/11/2023 12:25

LakieLady · 20/11/2023 12:20

If the government genuinely wanted to stop the boats, they'd never have left the EU and lost the UK its right to return asylum seekers to the first safe EU country they passed through.

It's no coincidence that numbers have more than doubled since 2019 imo. If Brexiteers had bothered to educate themselves about EU immigration rules, they might have found out that "taking back control" of our borders gave us less control, not more.

Being in the EU doesn’t help Italy who are bearing the brunt of Med crossings.

The systems are strained as every country starts to say no. As France did recently to Italy.

Also look at numbers for Med crossings, you are missing the global trends in migration, which is going up outside the U.K. and Brexit.

lost the UK its right to return asylum seekers to the first safe EU country they passed through.

What is this? Do you mean you think France would say yes to all the people who arrive here and seek asylum?

Over40Overdating · 20/11/2023 12:27

I see the easily led DM crowd are out with their 5 star hotel and unlimited cash lies.

Ironically, the DM style rhetoric which led to brexit and ‘taking back control’ has been a huge boost to the black market work culture that makes this country appealing to people wanting to come illegally.
English people either refused to do the jobs they accused immigrants of stealing or the employers did not want to pay the salaries needed to get people to work.

Thankfully for exploiters there’s no shortage of illegal immigrants who will work for cash in hand pennies.

The U.K. has some of the worst benefits and social housing in Europe and one of the highest costs of living. People are coming here because they have been lied to or are desperate and willing to enter the very welcoming black market economy that keeps this country on its feet.

therealcookiemonster · 20/11/2023 12:30

widowtwankywashroom · 20/11/2023 12:17

I would love to know how much the NHS pays for interpreting services every year

I've got no doubt they are sold a lie, but there's no getting away from the fact, NHS care is provided free, so are medications, so are interpretation services to asylum seekers, they haven't, like the majority paid in.

yep. let's ignore the fact that if we got rid of immigrants today, there would be no NHS tomorrow... or the fact that successive governments have starved the NHS of funding, cut hospital beds, played silly buggers with PFI (costs 700 quid to change a standard light bulb in my trust! as it's written into the contract- a member of staff bought one from b&q and changed it once and got a reprimand). no, let's blame the asylum seekers, of which a very small proportion need expensive medical care as they are mainly young and able bodied

jane1956 · 20/11/2023 12:34

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Oliotya · 20/11/2023 12:38

LakeTiticaca · 20/11/2023 12:20

You mean the rights of the victim?

Human rights are universal. Justice is seperate. Would you really like to live somewhere where human rights are selective? Really think about what that looks like.

Startingagainandagain · 20/11/2023 12:41

I think the reasons are:

  • language: English is easier to learn and widely spoken
  • indeed colonial past has a lot to do with it
  • existing communities: people already have relatives in the country who can help them find work.

I disagree that the benefit system is a draw because in reality rates are lower here than in most EU countries.

@LakeTiticaca
''It's because other countries don't give them 5 star hotel accommodation, access to medical and dental care, and cash handouts.''

Stop reading and believing the Daily Mail...benefits are a pittance in this country compared to what people get in the EU and nobody gets '5 star hotel accommodation'. It is really sad when people just believe this nonsense without even informing themselves.

nutsnutspistachionuts · 20/11/2023 12:44

The number of applications we receive in the UK is 4th highest in EU+ area (inc EEA/UK/Switzerland/etc) area, but a really low 4th - less than half of France (who were 2nd). It was 18th when measured per head of population.

"In the year ending September 2021, Germany received the highest number of asylum applicants (127,730) in the EU+, followed by France (96,510). When compared with the EU+ for the same period, the UK received the 4th largest number of applicants (44, 190 – including main applicants and dependents). This equates to 8% of the total asylum applicants across the EU+ and UK combined over that period, or the 18th largest intake when measured per head of population"
Link is external.

Swipe left for the next trending thread