As for the exam the current cohort won't sit, they probably will, as a mock, or as practice questions. That's what I did, and it's what my ds did.
Yes, but sitting a mock exam is nothing like sitting the actual exam (which is then marked and graded externally with grade boundaries decided based on the performance of the national cohort).
Say I taught 3 classes in 3 years.
Group 3 in 2023 got X% 9-4
Group 2 in 2022 got X% 9-4
Group 1 in 2021 got X% 9-4
Telling group 4 in 2024 what group 1/2/3 got is meaningless for group 4 because:
- each class in groups 1/2/3 is different
- each class in groups 1/2/3 are different sizes so one student substantially affects the overall % in a smaller class
- each class had different target grades
- what good progress looks like will vary for each of those classes. Two groups could have the same 9-4 % but one group has made excellent progress and another has made poor progress
Unless someone knows the prior attainment of the classes, the context of the classes and what level of progress would be classed as good progress for the class, knowing Mr Blogg's class got 80% 9-4 but Miss Wright got 60% 9-4 is meaningless.
Mr Blogg might have 80% 9-4, but most are grades 4/5, when based on KS2 data expected progress would be 80% 9-6.
Miss Wright might have 60% 9-4, and most of her class had a target grade of 2s and 3s so her class has made good progress.
The student/parent who is too busy fixating about what Mr Blogg and Miss Wright's groups got last year instead of working hard and acting on feedback lack all the required knowledge to draw meaningful conclusions from the number given.
So it begs the question why are some students/parents obsessed with gaining class or teacher level information?