Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Right to buy - grossly unfair on private renters and private home owners

210 replies

Winterday1991 · 14/11/2023 15:57

Is it just me or is RTB grossly unfair. People that already have cheap subsidised rent and a secure tenancy can get over to £105k off the market value of their council property.

This seems so unfair to us who have to brought in the private market at full market price and private renters who often do not have secure long term tenancies. Why should the public subsidise this?

OP posts:
Winterday1991 · 14/11/2023 16:00

*Over £105k

OP posts:
DiddyHeck · 14/11/2023 16:03

It's probably swings and roundabouts subsidy-wise as when the property is sold, the council no longer has to maintain it.

Hoardasurass · 14/11/2023 16:03

Do any councils still have right to buy?
I ask because it was scrapped by Scotland years ago and I thought England had too

VickyEadieofThigh · 14/11/2023 16:04

Winterday1991 · 14/11/2023 15:57

Is it just me or is RTB grossly unfair. People that already have cheap subsidised rent and a secure tenancy can get over to £105k off the market value of their council property.

This seems so unfair to us who have to brought in the private market at full market price and private renters who often do not have secure long term tenancies. Why should the public subsidise this?

It's stripped the country of social housing, driving rental prices sky high and leaving many families and individuals with no choice and inadequate housing.

It was an awful policy when Thatcher invented it and it still is.

Winterday1991 · 14/11/2023 16:04

DiddyHeck · 14/11/2023 16:03

It's probably swings and roundabouts subsidy-wise as when the property is sold, the council no longer has to maintain it.

But it doesn't seem fair on a societal level. It's unequal playing field

OP posts:
Sosickfromholidywahh · 14/11/2023 16:06

It’s so wrong!

Darthwazette · 14/11/2023 16:06

I think it’s a ridiculous policy not because it’s “not fair” but because we don’t have enough council property as it is so selling some off below market value seems plain stupid to me.

Daphnis156 · 14/11/2023 16:09

The RTB has been around so long, and these arguments are well known.
But it was a Tory policy, and got that dreadful woman Thatcher elected to ruin the country.

MargaretThursday · 14/11/2023 16:09

It's not fair on the people waiting for social housing because it reduces the stock which is not replaced at the rate it's needed. I don't see it as unfair to home owners.

BigBoysDontCry · 14/11/2023 16:10

I think at one point it had its merits. It took a lot of poorly maintained older housing stock off the books and allowed long term tenants the opportunity to upgrade them themselves. Additionally, being invested in the area generally improved the quality of the streets as well.

However, we aren't in that position any more. Property is hard to come by and the stock is generally in a better condition.

It should have been stopped long ago.

Dowhadiddydiddydum · 14/11/2023 16:11

Darthwazette · 14/11/2023 16:06

I think it’s a ridiculous policy not because it’s “not fair” but because we don’t have enough council property as it is so selling some off below market value seems plain stupid to me.

This^
we should be getting more not selling off what little HA and council properties we do have.

user1471538283 · 14/11/2023 16:11

None of it was ever fair. It takes stock away particularly in good areas and they were never replaced

It also encourages the mindset that by paying rent you are entitled to get something back.

I was always against it. God knows where the money went ...

RudsyFarmer · 14/11/2023 16:12

I never understood it as a policy. I remember my father absolutely furious that our neighbour bought his identical next door semi for about £4K when he had a £200k mortgage on ours.

flipent · 14/11/2023 16:12

You're right, it isn't fair.
I've privately rented for 20 years, and have just managed to buy at full market value.

My colleague is in Housing Association property with reduced rents and apparently a new kitchen and bathroom every 10 years for free (which I did not get in my private rental and will not get in my home). I don't know if they also have the right to buy.

But I'm also not sure what the alternative is.

Teapot32 · 14/11/2023 16:13

society isn’t fair though 🤷‍♀️ it’s just how it is. I know people who have used the RTB scheme who otherwise would never have been able to buy. I don’t begrudge people who benefit from it. It’s better everyone has a chance. You’re looking at it from a really bitter point of view. It’s not that we have to pay “tax” to cover their rent etc, they (people in RTB housing) are paying the actual market rate for rent where as people in the private sector are paying the landlords overinflated costs. Covering their mortgage and their income. It’s the greedy landlords who should be punished not the people just trying to secure a future.

MrsPinkL · 14/11/2023 16:13

It should have been scrapped a long time ago. The need for social housing is never going to reduce we need the properties.

G3t88 · 14/11/2023 16:14

Teapot32 · 14/11/2023 16:13

society isn’t fair though 🤷‍♀️ it’s just how it is. I know people who have used the RTB scheme who otherwise would never have been able to buy. I don’t begrudge people who benefit from it. It’s better everyone has a chance. You’re looking at it from a really bitter point of view. It’s not that we have to pay “tax” to cover their rent etc, they (people in RTB housing) are paying the actual market rate for rent where as people in the private sector are paying the landlords overinflated costs. Covering their mortgage and their income. It’s the greedy landlords who should be punished not the people just trying to secure a future.

They're not paying market rate for rent. In a lot of cases it's about half the market rate.

Teapot32 · 14/11/2023 16:15

flipent · 14/11/2023 16:12

You're right, it isn't fair.
I've privately rented for 20 years, and have just managed to buy at full market value.

My colleague is in Housing Association property with reduced rents and apparently a new kitchen and bathroom every 10 years for free (which I did not get in my private rental and will not get in my home). I don't know if they also have the right to buy.

But I'm also not sure what the alternative is.

You don’t get a new kitchen and bathroom every 10 years. This is a misconception (I worked for a HA). Also that stops if you buy the property but typically with HA homes it’s not right to buy, it’s right to acquire and has a lot less advantages/discount.

Teapot32 · 14/11/2023 16:16

@G3t88 that’s because everyone else is paying something that’s stupidly over inflated. I’m just amazed that people can be so bitter about people in social housing 🤷‍♀️ it’s not that big a deal

LemonLimeDivine · 14/11/2023 16:18

Of course it’s hugely unfair.

PinkflowersWhiteBerries · 14/11/2023 16:19

God knows where the money went…

Exactly this. I have vague memories of it being touted as an answer to funding care - as in let people buy their council built homes and then sell them to fund care. Well that’s worked a treat.

But really, as a business model, selling capital assets and using the money to subsidise current expenditure is a race to the bottom. Unless they actively reinvest the sales returns in more housing stock, the councils will run out of homes to rent,,, oh, wait ..

Locally, (Scotland) our council has been taking on private rentals as emergency housing stock. Helluva deal for the landlords. Guaranteed rent , Council maintains to the standard they take over, council tax paid if empty.
You cannot make this stuff up.

candywoo · 14/11/2023 16:20

I don't agree with the policy as it has created a shortage of social housing and a reason for an increase in homelessness.

But I wouldn't say its unfair to people who can private rent or buy their own home. It gives lower income families a chance to buy a home when they otherwise wouldn't be able to.

OhmygodDont · 14/11/2023 16:22

It could work amazingly if it was done correctly.

Only sold off houses over X years old so basically the harder to maintain older homes. All monies from the sale had to go into building new houses so for every 1 sold a new 1 must be created. Anyone who purchased their council house should they become a council tenant again never got the right to buy again, all funds for the deposit should of been proven to be saved via the tenant not a friend or family member “gifting” them the deposit when what was really happening was a non tenant was buying their mums or aunties house for themselves really.

BIossomtoes · 14/11/2023 16:23

But I'm also not sure what the alternative is.

Stop doing it and build lots more social housing. It’s not rocket science.

Fawbs89 · 14/11/2023 16:23

My mum used right to buy around 21 years ago to buy a lovely house she would not have otherwise had thw opportunity to buy (single mum of 4 children) it gave us the opportunity to grow up in a lovely area at a good school and feel secure. Myself now as an adult (34) is unfortunately not in a position to buy a property presently but I don't sit her envious or jealous of my mums situation (she was lucky and obtained a Council house in an affluent area of Cheshore). My motto in life is always concentrate on your own life and not how others live theirs.

Swipe left for the next trending thread