I guess he would - some extracts from my Guardian link:
Sir John Chilcot’s report is more than just a carefully worded, clearly argued dissection of the decisions that led Britain to go to war in 2003, and the failures thereafter. It amounts to an uncompromising and deeply critical exposition of the way Tony Blair conducted himself in office during this period.
In page after page, the report highlights how the former prime minister appeared to be privately saying one thing “sotto voce” to George W Bush, while keeping many of his own ministers – and military commanders – almost completely in the dark.
It also underlines how huge decisions about the legality of the war and the execution of the military campaign were never properly discussed at cabinet meetings...
All of these failures of leadership, the report notes, were down to the then prime minister.
Chilcot identifies 11 key moments in the two years prior to the invasion in which there should have been wider discussions “by a cabinet committee or small group of ministers” about important issues.
Chilcot records that there was also “no substantive discussion of the military options, despite promises by Mr Blair, before the [cabinet] meeting on 17 March – three days before the invasion.
In addition, the report says it could find “no evidence that any department or individual assumed ownership or was assigned responsibility for analysis or mitigation” about what might happen after the invasion. Chilcot puts the blame for this firmly on Blair.