Climate change is an ongoing nightmare. Inconvenience yourself for the sake of you and your kids future.
Anti EV car people are tedious dinosaurs.
You do know how most electricity is generated, don't you? Just because you don't see it as you drive, those power stations are pumping pollution into the same climate.
You absolutely should not be doing 260 miles without stopping for 10 minutes.
Having done a trip to Glasgow the other week, 256 miles I got there without a need to charge, however I did stop at 150 miles in to the journey, because that's how you stay a safe and alert driver.
Plenty of people will deliberately time it so that they can share the driving: one drives whilst the other sleeps. I used to have an Audi that nagged me once the engine had been on for 2 hours (annoying flashing that stopped me from being able to see useful info on the screen) and would only reset after the engine had been off for at least 10 minutes; but it had no way of knowing if I'd had a passenger who'd been sleeping for an hour and three quarters, just recently woken up and now fresh and alert to take over for the next two hours whilst I slept.
I can see how EVs can be great if you only ever travel relatively short distances and have a drive and charging point at home, but I think they are a big step backwards when it comes to long trips.
Everybody says that you have to 'change your mindset' but this is really another way of saying 'accept significant restrictions'. It's like saying that, if you can't get out of the house and/or afford to go shopping, then you can probably knock a perfectly adequate nutritional meal together from basics, as long as your cupboards are not completely bare; but would you actually 'change your mindset' and choose this all the time if you did have money and could easily get out regularly to Sainsbury's?
I don't want to be dictated to by my car when I can/must stop for quite a long time. Suppose I'm doing a 250-mile trip in a day (maybe to a destination with overnight charging facilities) and the car's range is 240 miles, it's just a pointless waste of time. It's the modern technological version of 'is the Sabbath made for man or man made for the Sabbath?'.
I also notice that, on the one hand, people are trumpeting (not very impressive) 200/250 or so mile ranges, but on the other hand, they're saying that you shouldn't let it get below 20% before stopping to charge it!
In our average mid-range 12yo diesel car, a full tank will do about 550 miles before we would need to stop for 5 minutes to refill, before we could do another 550 miles. I get the environmental concerns (many of which seem to me to be predicated on 'I can't see the pollution, so it doesn't exist'), but I cannot see why people are so desperate to try to convince me that, at least when it comes to range, moving to an EV would not obviously be a huge backwards, much less efficient step.