Something that really annoys me is when people say I’m “lucky” my children’s father isn’t around, how is it lucky to have kids with someone that doesn’t care about them or want to see them? Where is the luck in that? It’s actually awful having children with someone who doesn’t care about them and doesn’t want to see them. But never mind how I feel about it it’s also horrible for the children who feel abandoned and question why their father doesn’t care about them, I have to deal with the hurt and upset my children feel and honestly if I knew this that I would be now raising kids alone with no input from their father I never would have had children. If I wanted to raise children alone I would have used a donor but that’s a route I would never ever take as I didn’t want to raise children alone. I would just not have had any as I have no support from family so wouldn’t intentionally put myself into that situation and I expected even if me and my ex broke up he would still be involved in our children’s lives.
I wish for nothing more than a ex that cares about the children just as much as I do, that wants to see them just as much as I do, my ideal would have been 50/50. Yet people still tell me I’m lucky to have an ex that doesn’t bother, yes because that’s was my goal in life to be raising children alone with no support. You are not allowed to say people are lucky when their ex is good and decent because ”it’s not luck it’s the norm” so why is it ok to say it the other way round? I tried to explain this to people but still being met with well you are lucky as better that than an abusive man around, but my ex wasn’t abusive to our children so that isn’t the case here and if I came onto a persons post who shared 50/50 with their ex and their ex paid for half of all child related things and told them they were lucky because my ex doesn’t bother I would be ripped to shreds but it’s seemingly ok to tell me I’m lucky because some exes are abusive?