I didn't assume she was lying.
I said lots of posters were assuming she literally couldn't work due to a severely disabled child.
When OP had said nothing of the sort.
Then another posted how to receive DLA for a child, it may be that the parent might not be able to work. Not that they couldn't.
I suggested that OP may have thought she was currently unable to work but that being previously completely financially supported by the benefits system meant OP may need to review that stance and consider if it was solely because she couldn't 'just yet' because of the needs of the DC or that maybe it was her opinion that it wouldn't be great to start work 'just yet' or in an ideal world she wouldn't start work 'just yet' when in that ideal world which existed till this month, OP was receiving a significant amount of financial help from the state.
And still is, but less so because her eldest has turned 18.
And lots of people have posted about the people they know who actually do have severely disabled DC who do work. Which evidences the wide spectrum of families in existence.
And by the by, but I think most people were asking OP if she could adjust her stance on whether she could work 'just yet' or not and posters were jumping on those questions saying 'you don't understand what it is to be a carer of a severely disabled DC', she can't work'
And because OP gave such little information, we don't even know if her DC with complex needs is one of the two DC she shares 50/50 with their Dad.
So..asking questions shouldn't be a reason for other posters to jump on and project their own experiences and assume people are being mean or ableist.
I wasn't ever accusing OP of lying but knowing how people get whipped into outrage on these threads, which are very frequent and I was becoming involved in, I did wonder when discovering it was a new poster. That's all.