Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Councils going bust are not all at fault?

141 replies

Turmerictolly · 05/09/2023 20:51

Another council (Birmingham) declaring bankruptcy/severe financial difficulties. Yes, there has been some financial mismanagement but decades of austerity and squeeze from a Tory government haven't helped. I have connections to Birmingham and feel sorry for the sorry state it's in - the streets are filthy and depressing in a lot of areas.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
CredibilityProblem · 05/09/2023 23:11

moragmafs · 05/09/2023 22:46

@MidnightOnceMore students should pay. They aren't exempt. Increasing wages doesn't mean anything when the cost of living is so high.

My point is students use the services, and don't contribute. So make them contribute, like the adults they are.

The amount of hassle they cause to local areas as well with their drunkness etc.

Central government tops up the local government grant pro rata to the student population - so towns and cities with a disproportionate number of students shouldn't lose out in theory - though in practice it's a pretty murky calculation and I'm sure some towns feel shortchanged.

You could make students pay council tax, but in order for them to afford it you'd probably have to increase their maintenance loans, most of which would need to be paid off by the tax payer. And enforcing it on a population of housesharers who move every year, many of whom are overseas students, going to move back abroad at the end of their degree would be hugely expensive.

Starseeking · 05/09/2023 23:13

ScarletWitchM · 05/09/2023 22:23

Do they need to pay £100-200k for these jobs?

Those sound like pretty commercial salaries to me, considering they would also have gold plated pensions on top.

DdraigGoch · 05/09/2023 23:21

RafaistheKingofClay · 05/09/2023 23:04

I think they are old claims from 2012 and before when it wasn’t labour controlled.

It’s to do with bonuses. Low paid jobs typically done by women E.g. TAs, carers, school cooks etc didn’t get bonuses. Jobs typically done by men E.g. bin men, street cleaners did. GMB are taking a number of other councils to court for this so Birmingham are unlikely to be the only council who ends up going bankrupt.

I’m not quite sure why the liability bill is being paid now though. It’s a bit difficult to piece together from the media stories.

These are not old claims from the 2012 court case (which is still being paid off), these are extra and relate to decisions made in the last five years or so.

DdraigGoch · 05/09/2023 23:23

CredibilityProblem · 05/09/2023 23:11

Central government tops up the local government grant pro rata to the student population - so towns and cities with a disproportionate number of students shouldn't lose out in theory - though in practice it's a pretty murky calculation and I'm sure some towns feel shortchanged.

You could make students pay council tax, but in order for them to afford it you'd probably have to increase their maintenance loans, most of which would need to be paid off by the tax payer. And enforcing it on a population of housesharers who move every year, many of whom are overseas students, going to move back abroad at the end of their degree would be hugely expensive.

I thought that it was usually the landlord who paid council tax (where due) for a HMO.

DdraigGoch · 05/09/2023 23:24

Starseeking · 05/09/2023 23:13

Those sound like pretty commercial salaries to me, considering they would also have gold plated pensions on top.

The "Director of Strategy, Equalities and Partnerships" is on such a six-figure salary, despite coming into the job with no relevant experience at all.

hiredandsqueak · 05/09/2023 23:25

@Awittyfool no we are East Midlands, our SEND dept is in meltdown it isn't functioning at all. They miss 98% of statutory deadlines and are now averaging 85 formal complaints a week. That said people are formally complaining because they haven't reopened the phonelines since Covid and there have been an out of office response to all emails stating they aren't responding to emails or giving updates due to capacity issues. That the Head of SEND has as his out of office "I will delete all emails receieved unless I am in the office" so considering he's either on flexi leave, annual leave, sick leave, TOIL or working from home he isn't responding either. Ofsted due any day and they have apparently been practising every Monday for months presumably practising hiding and covering up the reality.

Starseeking · 05/09/2023 23:36

@DdraigGoch I've no connection to BCC, so not familiar with that Director or their experience (what you've mentioned sounds like a recruitment issue rather than a problem with the salary level).

My initial post should have been more explicit with regards to salary expectations at that size of the organisation. Apparently BCC is the biggest local authority in Europe, and having looked it up, it has a budget of £3.2bn.

I'd expect Assistant Directors and up to CEO to be on £100-300k for overseeing a budget if that size. Clearly they didn't look after it well, so something has obviously gone very wrong.

clopper · 05/09/2023 23:38

No doubt people will be along soon to talk about back room waste, bloated councils and pay

I have relatives who work for two different councils, one is a relatively senior staff member. They all say that there is a lot of waste and some ( not all) staff members WFH are much less productive than they were when working in an office in teams and apparently it is quite difficult to discipline or sack them.

CredibilityProblem · 05/09/2023 23:38

DdraigGoch · 05/09/2023 23:23

I thought that it was usually the landlord who paid council tax (where due) for a HMO.

Fair point - that would help with enforceability.
DC1 is getting endless council tax enforcement letters addressed to a previous occupant of their HMO though.

jcyclops · 06/09/2023 01:40

The equal pay claims led by the unions have been plodding along for years all around the country, and the councils almost never win. A council with which I am more familiar (with a budget about half that of Birmingham) initially intended to fight all the way to the Supreme Court, but in the end, settled the claim. This was around 12 years ago at a cost estimated to be around £20m for which they had been making provisions as the case proceeded through tribunals, lower courts and appeals. The Birmingham case originates back in 2008 so they have had 15 years to settle and prepare to pay, but they appear to have done nothing.

It is yet another example of local government being badly run. Councils thought they could run property development better than property developers and failed at horrendous cost. They thought they could run energy supply businesses better than the private sector, and these all went belly up at massive cost to their local taxpayers.

The future for Birmingham residents could well be that council tax will increase by well over the maximum allowed by the government for the rest of the country each year for the next few years. For example the increase for 2023 was limited to 5% across the country, but Croydon, under a Section 114 notice had to put their council tax up by 15%.

DdraigGoch · 06/09/2023 02:05

Starseeking · 05/09/2023 23:36

@DdraigGoch I've no connection to BCC, so not familiar with that Director or their experience (what you've mentioned sounds like a recruitment issue rather than a problem with the salary level).

My initial post should have been more explicit with regards to salary expectations at that size of the organisation. Apparently BCC is the biggest local authority in Europe, and having looked it up, it has a budget of £3.2bn.

I'd expect Assistant Directors and up to CEO to be on £100-300k for overseeing a budget if that size. Clearly they didn't look after it well, so something has obviously gone very wrong.

I'm not sure that "recruitment issue" quite explains his appointment. Given his political connections I wouldn't be surprised if it was more than just "appointing the wrong candidate" (a pretty big cock-up in the context of the lack of relevant experience) and that there was something more to this appointment. Verging on corruption perhaps.

jallopeno · 06/09/2023 06:18

jcyclops · 06/09/2023 01:40

The equal pay claims led by the unions have been plodding along for years all around the country, and the councils almost never win. A council with which I am more familiar (with a budget about half that of Birmingham) initially intended to fight all the way to the Supreme Court, but in the end, settled the claim. This was around 12 years ago at a cost estimated to be around £20m for which they had been making provisions as the case proceeded through tribunals, lower courts and appeals. The Birmingham case originates back in 2008 so they have had 15 years to settle and prepare to pay, but they appear to have done nothing.

It is yet another example of local government being badly run. Councils thought they could run property development better than property developers and failed at horrendous cost. They thought they could run energy supply businesses better than the private sector, and these all went belly up at massive cost to their local taxpayers.

The future for Birmingham residents could well be that council tax will increase by well over the maximum allowed by the government for the rest of the country each year for the next few years. For example the increase for 2023 was limited to 5% across the country, but Croydon, under a Section 114 notice had to put their council tax up by 15%.

Yes they should have seen it coming

Fairyliz · 06/09/2023 06:25

Wsmi · 05/09/2023 21:18

Councils have some of the most unproductive workforces of any sector. High absence rates, huge pensions, poor management, no accountability, massive overspending on projects.

All true, I worked for one for over 40 years.
They are also very keen on wfh, so you can imagine how little work actually gets done.

Simonjt · 06/09/2023 06:32

moragmafs · 05/09/2023 22:38

@Theunamedcat so they don't use the bins, streets, local services etc?

So what if they are studying.

People going to work and a low wage pay CT, so should student.

Students have lots of money. They can contribute to the area they live in - unless they get no service due to say living on a remote campus etc.

They are only studying, they aren't special.

Students have lots of money? Where, in fantasy land?!

Kpo58 · 06/09/2023 06:57

ScarletWitchM · 05/09/2023 22:23

Do they need to pay £100-200k for these jobs?

Yes they do as that pay is low for private directors and if you pay peanuts you get monkeys. Do you think that Gavin from the mailroom on min wage would be able to lead a council? No, you need proper experience and that does cost money.

KnittedCardi · 06/09/2023 07:03

Don't worry, the council leaders will all get big pay outs, go off for a bit of gardening leave and then pop back up in another local authority in a few months time. Just like the NHS.

DewinDwl · 06/09/2023 07:10

DdraigGoch · 05/09/2023 23:24

The "Director of Strategy, Equalities and Partnerships" is on such a six-figure salary, despite coming into the job with no relevant experience at all.

Should get a central government juicy contract soon then

StefanosHill · 06/09/2023 07:12

SkiingIsHeaven · 05/09/2023 22:47

I did some agency work for a local council and was shocked at how much waste went on.

Me moved offices and they threw so much stuff away even perfectly good stationary because they couldn't be bothered moving it.

They chucked out structural reports on their own housing stock, even when there was no back up copy. They said if they needed it then would just pay for a new one.

The amount of sickness was ridiculous. One lady tool two weeks off for a broken toe. He job was to sit on reception and she never normally moved around.

Two people would do the job of one person.

The waste of paper and photocopying was off the scale.

Coming from private practice I was shocked.

I really am not surprised that they are going bust.

No one was accountable for anything. It wasn't their money they were wasting.

No one was accountable for anything. It wasn't their money they were wasting.

It all sounds woeful

Winniewoooooooo · 06/09/2023 07:17

Utter drivel. The council have a budget. They have poorly managed the budget. I have just started working with the public sector - frankly I am totally appalled by decisions made. This is not a Government issue - it's the lack of any sense in the senior team at the council.

HermioneWeasley · 06/09/2023 07:33

Perhaps less spending on things like rainbow crossings?

To think Councils going bust are not all at fault?
HermioneWeasley · 06/09/2023 08:53

Or changing road names to virtue signal?

To think Councils going bust are not all at fault?
TheWayofBeing · 06/09/2023 10:16

Yeah... they got sued to hell and spent £100k on a botched It system

TheWayofBeing · 06/09/2023 10:18

Sorry 100mil not k

FunkyMonks · 06/09/2023 10:25

Sadly every council has over paid heads ridiculous salaries I say stop paying these types of salaries there are others that work in far more demanding stressful jobs without the added perks for less.

It's infuriating when you clock the salaries half of them are on same with NHS they are over paying the wrong ones. Instead of helping those that are more on the front lines with better pay.

SecretPlanToFightInflation · 06/09/2023 10:39

Woking spaffed millions on dodgy investments into dodgy companies all green lighted without due diligence by the then Tory Council. It was like there was a magic money tree powered by Tory cronyism - and the main guys retired and moved quickly away once it all came out.

Personally I think they should be prosecuted.