Why pit bulls are being mentioned on here I don’t know as they’re banned in the UK. They’re not bred for aggression, either.
They were originally known as nanny dogs. Great with kids. The trouble is, many
people who get hold of pit bulls, XL bullies, Rottweilers, etc either want a status symbol and to look hard or don’t have a fucking clue.
It’s not the breed. It’s the backyard breeders and shitty owners. There’s a lot more people now trying to raise awareness of this and attract good owners to the breeds.
You can’t blame the dog when they’ve been raised to be aggressive. Or poorly trained or under stimulated. This idea that a breed is intrinsically aggressive is ludicrous and removes all human responsibility.
For every attack by one of the feared breeds (and there seems to be a new one every month- feared breed that is) there’s one hundred dogs of the same breed that is perfectly lovely and well behaved. You don’t hear about that because it wouldn’t suit the narrative.
It’s also a little known fact that the media loves to report on dog attacks and then use images of a breed not involved in said attack. Anything to push the narrative as most people won’t read beyond the headline to find out.
i used to be terrified of staffies. A couple of them had attacked my childhood dog multiple times. Now I realise that the owner made the dogs that way. They wanted a status symbol and made them aggressive. Now I just feel sad for the dogs.