Long story short(ish):
Landlord is being forced to sell the house we've rented for 9 years, wants us to buy it, DH and I have been approved for a 100% mortgage - all good so far...
Valuers turn up to inspect the house, discover the loft conversion isn't up to regs and can't be classed as a 3rd bedroom - we can sign something to say we "won't use it as a bedroom" to allow the mortgage to go ahead, even though we have been using it as a bedroom for the past 9 years, that was the whole fecking point in moving to a 3 bed house! FFS
Things are progressing, solicitor has sent contracts for us to sign etc.
But here's my query - shouldn't the value of the house now reflect that it is NOT a 3 bed and is actually a 2 bed with "loft storage"? Surely we can't be expected to pay 3 bed price for a house that isn't.....????
No idea as yet what it will take to make the loft "liveable" but I don't see why we should have to pay for a 3 bed house AND pay to make the loft meet regs! If that's even something we would have to do, but if we didn't wouldn't that make any buildings insurance invalid if the worst was to happen?
DH is happy to proceed, doesn't see an issue, can't see why I'm making a fuss - I guess he's just relieved we a) meet the criteria for the mortgage on this house (specific circumstances) b) don't have to move 9 years worth of stuff and c) won't end up homeless as there is nothing else to rent in our area and no guarantee we'd get a mortgage on another house.
I'm just so confused by the whole sodding thing, and angry that the landlord misrepresented the house in the first place by advertising it as a 3 bed when he knew the loft conversion was dodgy!
Any insight/advise welcome