Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To not be able to stand film and TV nowadays because it always has an agenda?

561 replies

mintlily · 14/06/2023 19:49

I've noticed that I can only bear to watch TV shows and films produced until roughly 2008.

It feels like everything nowadays has some kind of moral or political agenda. The writers are either trying to show off how enlightened they are, or condition you to accept their certain neo-Marxist world view. Virtually ALL dramas have an LGBT, feminist or anti-racist agenda, delivered with 0 subtlety or nuance. And the way it is done is so patronising and disrespectful to historical writers and figures - as if we 21st century people are the moral arbiters of history, and must overlay our more enlightened worldview on their bigoted work, which was surely produced in ignorance. It's also patronising to the intelligence of viewers, as if we need everything censored for our innocent eyes and can't make our own moral judgements. There is something puritanical and unartistic about it, like the Victorians censoring art to not corrupt the masses.

For example:

The new Little Mermaid deleting the line "men don't like women who blabber" from Ursula's songs. Ursula is a villain. We can cope with her being sexist, for goodness sake - we know that we're supposed to think she's wrong. The writer didn't need to fret that children would internalise the worldview of the villain.

Anne of Green Gables and her gay best friend. Why? This is not the genre to deal with LGBT issues. The author had no interest in this subject (as far as I'm aware).

Call the Midwife and it's pro-abortion stance. As if CATHOLIC MIDWIVES IN THE 1970s would have been pro-abortion?!

It's nothing to do with your actual views on these subjects. I just find that TV and film lacks the nuance and intelligence that it used to and I actually can't bear to watch any of it anymore, as it just feels so soulless.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
DataNotLore · 14/06/2023 19:53

Drama, literature and art reflects life and always have.

Star Trek had an interacial kiss in the 60's

Your politics just doesn't chime with the modern world anymore

TheMurderousGoose · 14/06/2023 19:53

Call the Midwife and it's pro-abortion stance. As if CATHOLIC MIDWIVES IN THE 1970s would have been pro-abortion?!

Well the nuns on Call the Midwife are Anglican nuns, so...

mintlily · 14/06/2023 19:54

TheMurderousGoose · 14/06/2023 19:53

Call the Midwife and it's pro-abortion stance. As if CATHOLIC MIDWIVES IN THE 1970s would have been pro-abortion?!

Well the nuns on Call the Midwife are Anglican nuns, so...

True but I don't think that makes a difference

OP posts:
Flickersy · 14/06/2023 19:54

You're allowed to watch whatever you like you know, you don't have to ask if you're being unreasonable.

I suspect this thread was started with its own agenda to get everyone complaining about "woke" though...

Pocketfullofdogtreats · 14/06/2023 19:55

You have a point. It's the same with books, modern novels. Ones set in previous eras seem to show modern sensibilities rather than what you'd expect from that era.
I noticed it in Ten Pound Poms with the (male) abortion procurer saying that women should have legal access to safe abortions (or something like that) instead of telling the girl off for being a slut, which would be more believable.

RebulahConundrum · 14/06/2023 19:57

YABU tv has literally always had an agenda. Look at Bewitched, I Love Lucy, Star Trek, even Brookside.

mintlily · 14/06/2023 20:02

I just don't think it's true that art for entertainment has always had a political agenda. At least, artists didn't seem to be as terrified of being seen to have the wrong opinions as they do nowadays. Or, it was ok to produce art without having to draw in every hot topic of the day. Art for art's sake is lost

OP posts:
DataNotLore · 14/06/2023 20:03

mintlily · 14/06/2023 20:02

I just don't think it's true that art for entertainment has always had a political agenda. At least, artists didn't seem to be as terrified of being seen to have the wrong opinions as they do nowadays. Or, it was ok to produce art without having to draw in every hot topic of the day. Art for art's sake is lost

It is true.

Never read any Shakespeare?

IsThereAnEchoInHere · 14/06/2023 20:05

I have more problem with the gratuitous sex scenes for no reason, nudity - mostly just to objectify, even worse if it’s in the name of ’sex positivity’ or ’female empowerment’ 🙄.
Also there is a strong push for the bdsm shit.
And I don’t even watch type of movies that are about relationship/romance etc.
They push that shit on every genre.
I don’t know why.

longwayoff · 14/06/2023 20:06

Oh what utter twaddle. Read some history.

mintlily · 14/06/2023 20:06

DataNotLore · 14/06/2023 20:03

It is true.

Never read any Shakespeare?

I have a degree in English Literature and constantly have a classic novel or play on the go.
In Shakespeare's day, you did have to present certain worldviews in order to stay on the right side of the authorities.
But who are the moral authorities now? Activists?

I'm talking more about 20th century art, when artists were finally free to be experimental and controversial, and art for art's sake was alive and well. This is what we've lost.

OP posts:
Againstmachine · 14/06/2023 20:07

All TV has a an agenda so just watch what you like.

A hilarious game is a speed watch Supergirl to see what box they are ticking this week, it's so right on its pathetic.

chilaquiles · 14/06/2023 20:08

Please can you give some examples of these pre-2008 cultural products that you find acceptable OP?

DataNotLore · 14/06/2023 20:08

Or Dickens? Massive agenda there.

mintlily · 14/06/2023 20:09

DataNotLore · 14/06/2023 20:08

Or Dickens? Massive agenda there.

Yess but his agenda was counter-cultural

OP posts:
DataNotLore · 14/06/2023 20:10

chilaquiles · 14/06/2023 20:08

Please can you give some examples of these pre-2008 cultural products that you find acceptable OP?

What is this apolitical art?

AnObserverInThisDarkWorld · 14/06/2023 20:11

Ah so an agenda is only OK if it suits YOUR world view....

DataNotLore · 14/06/2023 20:12

Cowboy films.

Re-wrote history.

Gladiator did too

mintlily · 14/06/2023 20:12

DataNotLore · 14/06/2023 20:08

Or Dickens? Massive agenda there.

Dickens wasn't trying to stay on the right side of activists and politicians. His art was truly shocking in its exposure of poverty and maltreatment of children. It was doing a new thing to actively bring about social change. Art now just spouts the same worldviews in a contrived and patronising way, usually on topics that have already been addressed by society.

OP posts:
DdraigGoch · 14/06/2023 20:14

I wouldn't mind if they made it fit convincingly in the plot.

Avondale89 · 14/06/2023 20:16

Rubbish. You need to broaden what you're consuming.

Avondale89 · 14/06/2023 20:16

And why 2008 specifically? Bizarre frame of reference.

I'm sure people of every generation think this. You're just getting old.

mintlily · 14/06/2023 20:16

AnObserverInThisDarkWorld · 14/06/2023 20:11

Ah so an agenda is only OK if it suits YOUR world view....

Erm, no. I often read books and watch films that present worldviews I don't like. That's not the point. It's the way these views are presented that is the problem.

OP posts:
Begsthequestion · 14/06/2023 20:17

mintlily · 14/06/2023 20:12

Dickens wasn't trying to stay on the right side of activists and politicians. His art was truly shocking in its exposure of poverty and maltreatment of children. It was doing a new thing to actively bring about social change. Art now just spouts the same worldviews in a contrived and patronising way, usually on topics that have already been addressed by society.

You are essentially the shocked, conservative audience of Dickens' day, and he is a 'woke' author pushing an 'agenda' that you don't agree with.