I imagined, as I'm sure a lot of people did, that the first lockdown was to buy us a couple of months or more to change things- to pour resources into PPE, into the health-care systems, I just imagined things would be scaled up. That was a good justification for pausing life. Unfortunately, given the scale of the government who had already weakened the NHS, then gave all the money to their friends, and so on- meant that that precious window wasn't used properly at all and we became stuck in a lockdown cycle that was pointless.
One reason it was pointless was that the gov't was doing things to actively cause the spread, the most obvious one being insisting that elderly patients with Covid were returned to their care homes, without proper testing or quarantine.
If you do that to the most vulnerable, then you are essentially promoting that sector to get sick and die, so tinkering around with lockdowns to preserve most of the rest of us is pointless.
I have always been against government rules dictating what we can do in our own homes and I did break the rules a few times with dying or elderly relatives as whilst I think it's fine to police public spaces, I don't agree the state should be able to tell you if your grandma can come over to your house. The risk is yours to take. So all measures interfering with the privacy and choices in your home (beyond serious crimes like abuse) I don't agree with anyway.
The lockdown wasn't used as I thought it was going to be used, after all that bought time we still didn't have enough hospital capacity, so it turned out to be useless.