Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Lockdown report/Covid enquiry - if you supported lockdown do you regret it?

1000 replies

Hell121 · 06/06/2023 09:46

I haven’t seen a thread on this so sorry if it has been done. In light of the report yesterday I wander if people have changed their minds on whether lockdown was a good idea. I remember the threads of utter lunacy on here and the mask hysteria/schools debate. I was against lockdowns and masks very early on but complied - I don’t think I’d ever do it again. I genuinely think it was a massive overreaction which has damaged things in this country irreparably and left many children and adults far worse off than they were pre covid.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
SunnyEgg · 06/06/2023 18:40

LOTS of us foresaw how lockdown would play out for the most vulnerable like Arthur - and we got shouted down on MN and got called granny killers and told it would never happen.

Harm to dc and increase in DV was known.

It was only on mn groups slammed the discussion, because they wanted lockdown or restrictions to continue.

Mn was crazy over this stuff and the least likely to accept arguments such as this

YetMoreNewBeginnings · 06/06/2023 19:07

Tbh the main victory for the government in this saga is that people, generally, are so focussed on other normal (as in non political) people’s behaviour and stance through it and debating that/having pops at each other they their fuck ups (wasted PPE, contracts for mates etc).

Its the same tactic they’ve used with the welfare budget. Taking the focus off themselves and setting people against each other.

Its one thing they are very good at!

Puzzledandpissedoff · 06/06/2023 19:12

The first lockdown was understandable, because we had no idea what we were dealing with and everyone could see the appalling scenes coming out of Italy

I've always agreed about the first lockdown, because it wasn't known what we were dealing with, but some of the scenes "coming out of Italy" are dealt with here: https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-italy-coffins-idUSKBN21F0XL

False claim: Photo shows coffins of coronavirus victims in Italy

Each shared well over 100 times on Facebook as of March 28, 2020, two social media posts show a photograph of three long rows of coffins (https://www.facebook.com/nicky.mewettx/posts/10158332946970921 and https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1500606...

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-italy-coffins-idUSKBN21F0XL

YukoandHiro · 06/06/2023 19:22

Hell121 · 06/06/2023 10:04

@Umbonkers - that sums up how I feel. I think what makes me angry is that a lot of people at the time questioned it - the lunacy of ongoing furlough and could see that the cost/benefit wouldn’t work out and those that did question it were shouted down. I do think there was an element of people who loved it. Lots of people advocated for a Swedish approach and were shot down. I just hope that even though the enquiry will come out with lots of lessons learned platitudes people will not so blindly “follow the science”.

I really don't think people loved it. I think some people were much more scared than others. And there are all kinds of reasons for that, most nothing to do with actual vulnerability levels.

LlynTegid · 06/06/2023 19:23

We did not have lockdown. Unless you were CEV you could go shopping, for a walk and some other things.

What I regret is because restrictions of varying kinds were not introduced until late March, at least 20,000 people died who should not have done. And that restrictions especially school closures were longer than they need have been.

The only reason why Boris Johnson should not hang for his neglect is that the death penalty quite rightly has been abolished.

StormShadow · 06/06/2023 19:23

There are posters on here who've talked about having enjoyed lockdown, tbf. Especially the first one.

FabFitFifties · 06/06/2023 19:31

I supported it because as a community nurse I had no choice - in terms of my family/personal life I would not support another lockdown. The damage caused to people's mental health was horrendous - including members of my family. Not because they were worried about covid - but massive problems arising as a result of following the rules. I would go as far as to say our family will never return to our pre covid situation in significant ways.

Iwouldliketogotosweden · 06/06/2023 19:42

I was on the other side in intensive care. The fear and waiting in March was horrendous and when it stated, we had so many sick people. And we had nothing to give them. We gave them oxygen and antibiotics and tried our usual measure but nothing worked. If you were intubated the mortality rate was 70%. People were basically saying goodbye on intubation. We should have locked down earlier in 2020.
I was feeling fairly positive by the early autumn, and thought restrictions should be eased. But the second big wave December/January/February 2021 was almost worse. We by then had some drugs that might help and the most vulnerable had started having vaccines. What was the worst bit was everyone had mixed for Christmas, we went into lockdown in our area Boxing Day. So everyone had big Christmas days. So we had families coming in. I had to tell someone her father had died after her mother had the night before. And tell a heavily pregnant woman who was sick with it her father had died. We went from 10 CPAP beds to 35, and 25 ITU beds to nearly 60, we had spread everywhere. And if there hadn’t been some lockdown where would we put all the usual patients?
it was badly managed and key things were missed but it was needed.

LoobyDop · 06/06/2023 19:45

It’s like the new Brexit, isn’t it. Lots of people saying “oh yes well we know NOW it wasn’t the best idea, we know NOW, but we didn’t know THEN, back then it was just not known at all and isn’t hindsight a wonderful thing”.

And some of us are quite flabbergasted because we did fucking know then, and every time someone dared to hint at it they got called a granny murderer and a science denier and fuck only knows what else and told to put cheese in their coffee by a baying mob. So at least acknowledge that you were fucking vile to people because you were scared and believed whatever you were told, and not because you were right and we were evil.

SunnyEgg · 06/06/2023 19:51

LoobyDop · 06/06/2023 19:45

It’s like the new Brexit, isn’t it. Lots of people saying “oh yes well we know NOW it wasn’t the best idea, we know NOW, but we didn’t know THEN, back then it was just not known at all and isn’t hindsight a wonderful thing”.

And some of us are quite flabbergasted because we did fucking know then, and every time someone dared to hint at it they got called a granny murderer and a science denier and fuck only knows what else and told to put cheese in their coffee by a baying mob. So at least acknowledge that you were fucking vile to people because you were scared and believed whatever you were told, and not because you were right and we were evil.

And some of us are quite flabbergasted because we did fucking know then, and every time someone dared to hint at it they got called a granny murderer and a science denier and fuck only knows what else and told to put cheese in their coffee by a baying mob

Yeh I’d take this admission

JohnPrescottsPyjamas · 06/06/2023 20:03

Don’t forget the propaganda coming out of China too.
Remember the footage of people keeling over in the street (often with their hands out in front of them!) and the pictures of bodies being left where they fell (also neatly on their backs with their hands by their sides) because people were so frightened of contagion and the hospital corridors full of unburied dead?
No wonder there was the initial panic.

It all fell apart very quickly for me when politicians, advisors and public figures were caught left, right and centre visiting their grannies, their country houses, their mistresses and Barnard Castle. A neighbour of mine flies for an executive jet company and he was working all through the lockdown taking the great and the good to the Seychelles and other tropical paradises.
Thats when I realised we were being played as mugs.
The release of the Matt Hancock whatsapp messages further confirmed it.

Hell121 · 06/06/2023 20:40

@Cornettoninja you can’t compare the populations of Australia and NZ to the uk IMO

And for this blasting the science behind the report what about the science behind saying this should have been done to us?!

As I said upthread I think the question in all of this should be so you think everything we did was worth it?

OP posts:
Dymaxion · 06/06/2023 20:42

I supported it because as a community nurse I had no choice

So would people leave their jobs if there was another lock down in the future and their employer required them to follow rules, that's additional lockdown rules, most jobs require you to follow some sort of 'rules' ?
Like @FabFitFifties I had to go to work and had to follow the 'rules', the alternative was giving up my job. One small plus side - the lack of traffic was fabulous if you worked in the community. dressing up like a giant blue mutant, not so much Smile

RafaistheKingofClay · 06/06/2023 21:07

Fightyouforthatpie · 06/06/2023 12:44

WTAF

The blonde bombshell of a disaster openly himself said it was nothing to worry about

Have you forgotten the bit where he was intensive care? Or do you think that was made up?

I should have realised by your use of "sheeple" you were a tinfoil hatter with a limited grasp of reality.

You would have thought that Boris Johnson saying it was nothing to worry about is as close as you could get to incontrovertible proof that it was something to worry about.

blondieminx · 06/06/2023 21:17

Babyroobs · 06/06/2023 10:01

I supported lockdown and locked down my own family earlier as dh is clinically vulnerable. I took dd out of school a week or so before they closed and was amazed that others weren't and that the government seemed to be delaying. a lot of lives could have been saved if they had locked down earlier.

Same here - except I’m the clinically vulnerable one.

lots of people with very short memories here who don’t seem to understand things like case fatality rates or that until the vax programme was actually rolled out nationwide from February 2021 for the elderly and vulnerable , reducing transmission was an effective way to reduce infection/death.

I note the ONS stating today “11,111 deaths were registered in England and Wales in the week ending 26 May 2023 (Week 21), this was 10.1% above the five-year average (1,021 more deaths).”

many people sadly are not “living with covid”. People die of it and people are disabled by it. Including kids.

fairywhale · 06/06/2023 22:26

thebellagio · 06/06/2023 10:20

What really shocked me though was the lack of understanding of data and statistics, as well as the inability to have critical thinking.

My own parents thought I was a conspiracy theorist, purely because I didn't believe everything the Daily Mail wrote. My degree taught me to learn about media bias and journalist bias. The best advice I can ever give anyone is to read the same story across multiple media types - you'll start to see how different reporting can sway opinions and give you better critical thinking skills.

In terms of statistics, how many times did we see the reports "xx amount of people died in the last 24 hours?" No they didn't. Their death certificates were logged in those hours. Some of those, had died days, weeks or even months earlier but there was a backlog, especially over BH weekends. Yet the media (the BBC I'm looking at you) insisted on claiming that people had died in those 25 hours.

There was also the fact that the initial figures were skewed because it showed ANY death was due to covid if they'd previously had an infection, even if they had been hit by a bus or had a heart attack months later. And again, on these very boards, posters were trying to argue against this logic accusing anyone of minimising the pandemic.

'Twas very strange indeed.

Fully agree

MyFavouriteKindOfBalloon · 07/06/2023 05:01

justteanbiscuits · 06/06/2023 17:26

Do I think the government acted correctly during 2020/2021? No, not at all. The first lockdown came too late, and their ridiculous PPE bullshit should have got the lot of them sacked. Pandemic guidelines were ignored in the time leading up to it, with huge stores of PPE destroyed for no real reason. And don't get me started on the ridiculousness of eat out to help out, and the even more ridiculous being able to eat in a pub but not drink etc etc.

But, the first lockdown was what was needed at that point. Guidelines were needed because sadly the British public showed they couldn't be trusted to be sensible. Mask wearing and hand hygiene has been shown, in many peer reviewed papers and studies to reduce transmission - either by reducing the sharing, or preventing catching - but we have posts in here from people saying how they refused to wear them because they're stupid. They're not stupid.

And anyone not 100% against it all is being labelled as batshit, idiots etc etc etc.

THIS is why strict guidelines were needed. Because if they'd said "please be sensible, follow good hand hygiene and mask wearing and sensible social distancing" a large section of society would have purposely ignored it. The same people claiming the hospitals weren't overloaded because their mates cousin said they knew a nurse in the NHS who was sat at home. The same people claiming it was all made up because some nurses let off some much needed stress by making a funny 5 minute video. That they clapped people surviving and leaving hospital so weren't busy. And those same clinical staff were lying on death certificates. I doubt any of those people understand at all how heartbreaking this was for NHS staff seeing and dealing with things you will never, ever want to go through.

This completely.

There aren't half some crackpot conspiracies on this thread.

Sugarfree23 · 07/06/2023 05:52

Purplesilkpyjamas · 06/06/2023 10:37

I think Nightingales had medical staffing issues

Yes they had staffing issues. Basically they were set up for the dying, to be staffed by anyonewith any medical knowledge, vets, dentists, etc. Remember they didn't know what they were dealing with.

However Glasgows was eventually used as an outpatients for various departments inc dermatology just so they could socially distance patients and staff

AntQueen · 07/06/2023 05:54

@MyFavouriteKindOfBalloon

This completely.
There aren't half some crackpot conspiracies on this thread.

I completely agree with you. I live in a country that had lockdowns that went far, far longer than any in England, and additionally, our borders were closed for almost two years. Within the country, we had closed borders and security checkpoints too for quite some time. Anyone who became ill mildly was sent to a quarantine hotel to ride it out. Our hospitals were completely overwhelmed with sick and dying people and it was only the arrival of the vaccine - plus the closed borders - that slowed things down. The sick and dying were not just the elderly, either.

I find the tendency to turn on those that have helped you out of what could have been a major catastrophe deeply concerning, particularly if they are healthcare professionals and scientists. I also see that this tends to be driven by social media, and that commonly has an agenda - and in the past few years, SM agendas are dominated by right-wing Russian bot-farms. Many of the conspiracies and repeated phrases on this thread were born in Russian bot-farms.

Remotecontrolatmyside · 07/06/2023 06:21

It was the right thing to do at the time. Yes I supported it and followed it. Lots of people who now say it shouldn't have happened were totally for it at the time but seem to have forgotten that.

Aishah231 · 07/06/2023 07:07

Excess death rates are higher now after the vaccines than before. Can we please drop the idea that we came out of this because of the vaccines - which Pfizer etc now admit were not even tested to see if they stopped transmission. Why on earth people suddenly started trusting politicians and pharmaceutical companies (proven in court numerous times to have lied and falsified studies) is beyond me. I can hear the drum beat of pandemic 2 coming. They certainly made a lot of money from COVID.

Tumbleweed101 · 07/06/2023 07:20

I haven’t seen the report. I think the first lock down could be justified in that we were learning what was going on and trying to work out how bad the virus was.

Later lockdowns I didn’t feel were so necessary as we had learned much more and other measures were in place. Masks always seemed pointless to me and were the thing that affected me most.

We are definitely still seeing the effects of lockdown in the young children I care for. Many of these children probably saw nobody outside immediately family for months at a time where children need socialising and the affect on behaviour and communication is definitely a thing.

SunnyEgg · 07/06/2023 07:27

Remotecontrolatmyside · 07/06/2023 06:21

It was the right thing to do at the time. Yes I supported it and followed it. Lots of people who now say it shouldn't have happened were totally for it at the time but seem to have forgotten that.

Many talked about issues on here at the time too

The trouble is the reaction was extreme

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.