Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think this driving manoeuvre was both safe and legal?

268 replies

AmazonAmazine · 27/05/2023 16:49

Arguing with my dad who was the passenger!

3 lane motorway. I was in the left lane, cruising around 70 as no one in front. Came up to a car in the centre lane doing around 50mph. The right lane was running fast, I’d guess over 70.

I assessed the safest thing to do was carry on being very vigilant and slow a little bit and steadily pass the slow car in my lane at around 60. The alternative was get behind it then attempt to accelerate into the fast flowing right lane, accelerating in between higher powered cars from a much lower speed. I’d been forced to slow a bit on approach already, there was no obvious gap in the right lane which everyone as crowding into on approach from the centre lane. The middle car clearly wasn’t shifting, the left lane ahead of me was very clear. The road wasn’t otherwise particularly busy, the right lane was just busy because of this car.

I was very aware, ultimately had a hard shoulder for emergency and I was watching the car well for any sign of switching lane.

iabu- you should have crossed back and forth over two lanes, as it’s always the passing lane
Ianbu- this was the safest way of dealing with the hazard.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
chupachucks · 27/05/2023 21:07

AmazonAmazine · 27/05/2023 20:59

I have to admit- As someone who reported a car hitting my parked car, gave the details of a witness and offered to provide ring doorbell footage with a clear view of the numberplate and couldn’t get a police reaction… it doesn’t really make me think it’s a productive hobby

Between October and December last year, the Force received 326 Operation Snap video submissions from a total of 202 individual witnesses, resulting in 180 Notice of Intended Prosecution (NIP) letters being sent to registered vehicle owners.

https://www.northants.police.uk/news/northants/news/news/2022/february/more-examples-of-poor-driver-behaviour-captured-on-dash-cam-footage-on-the-countys-roads/

Also for the both of you I have numerous emails from the police, informing me they are going to trace the drivers from uploaded Dashcam videos. So scoff all you like but I'm not the one who cannot drive responsibly or safely, 🙄

Also for those on MN who want to report people like the OP and make our roads safer places to drive, https://nextbase.co.uk/national-dash-cam-safety-portal/

national-dash-cam-safety-portal

https://nextbase.co.uk/national-dash-cam-safety-portal

AmazonAmazine · 27/05/2023 21:11

Any the outcomes? The replies have a link to follow it up it says. Not just to say they will trace

OP posts:
NoTouch · 27/05/2023 21:14

AmazonAmazine · 27/05/2023 17:20

As advice. Not illegal. I acknowledge the advice, but not an offence

Undertaking itself is not a specific offence, but you could be done for careless driving for undertaking at speed on a flowing motorway.

They were wrong to hog the middle lane you were dangerous undertaking and the police would pull you over rather than them.

Anyone who doesn't feel able to get into the correct lane and thinks undertaking is ok, shouldnt be on motorways.

User1529865 · 27/05/2023 21:15

People that think they are good drivers and come on here spouting this are generally the worst drivers in real life

chupachucks · 27/05/2023 21:17

AmazonAmazine · 27/05/2023 21:11

Any the outcomes? The replies have a link to follow it up it says. Not just to say they will trace

Oh dear op you don't really know much do you , failing to provide information regarding who was driving the vehicle at the time after receiving a NIP, results in you will receive a fine of up to £1,000, 6 penalty points on your driving licence and/or a disqualification from driving.

So tracing a driver is not really an issue any more , as long as the registration is clearly visible on dashcam footage and you are deemed to have broken the law or have unacceptable driving standards you will be notified and asked to provide information on who was driving or receive 6 points.

AmazonAmazine · 27/05/2023 21:17

User1529865 · 27/05/2023 21:15

People that think they are good drivers and come on here spouting this are generally the worst drivers in real life

Probably the ones in the middle lane ensuring everyone is at a ‘safe’ speed

OP posts:
AmazonAmazine · 27/05/2023 21:19

chupachucks · 27/05/2023 21:17

Oh dear op you don't really know much do you , failing to provide information regarding who was driving the vehicle at the time after receiving a NIP, results in you will receive a fine of up to £1,000, 6 penalty points on your driving licence and/or a disqualification from driving.

So tracing a driver is not really an issue any more , as long as the registration is clearly visible on dashcam footage and you are deemed to have broken the law or have unacceptable driving standards you will be notified and asked to provide information on who was driving or receive 6 points.

Now hold the stick at the other end and read slowly.

Im saying:
The emails you receive
They have a link
You can follow up the outcome of the footage
You don’t need to just tell us ‘they will trace the driver’
You can actually look up the outcome of your footage

OP posts:
chupachucks · 27/05/2023 21:23

The emails I have received from numerous forces always say they have reviewed the footage and the vehicles involved with be dealt traced and the driver with either be given a driver awareness course, fine or points. The emails usually come through 3 days after submitting the footage after they have been reviewed. You are reminded not to share the footage on social media and to keep it encase it goes to court.

Curseofthenation · 27/05/2023 21:31

I would not undertake in any circumstance. It's careless and not worth the risk of an accident. I say that as someone that is very irritated by middle lane hoggers and drives at a 70 on motorways. You were in the wrong. Your dad is right.

You can convince yourself all you like.

Curseofthenation · 27/05/2023 21:32

Apart from in a traffic jam of course.

DumpedByText · 27/05/2023 21:39

It's not undertaking if the lane to the right of you is going slower than your lane. You were right, you can't brake and slow down just because they are hogging the middle!

AmazonAmazine · 27/05/2023 21:47

Out of interest for the ‘never undertake’ people.

If it was a dual carriageway and someone was in the right lane doing well under the speed limit on an empty road- what would you do? Like this, at least 20mpb or more than what you’d expect the road to be. Weren’t going to shift

OP posts:
theGooHasGone · 27/05/2023 22:54

There's no point arguing with all the middle lane apologists. Highway code rule 264 says drive on the left unless overtaking. It isn't the law (sadly), just a suggestion. If there was more proactive police enforcement it might stop people doing it.

jools85 · 27/05/2023 23:07

My husband is a Driving Instructor, there's no way he'd let me off with this, apparently it's both illegal and extremely dangerous. Your Dad is correct but I totally get where you're coming from 😀

Cantthinkofaname2203 · 27/05/2023 23:11

jools85 · 27/05/2023 23:07

My husband is a Driving Instructor, there's no way he'd let me off with this, apparently it's both illegal and extremely dangerous. Your Dad is correct but I totally get where you're coming from 😀

It’s not illegal.

MightyEagle · 27/05/2023 23:17

When I had to do a speed awareness course (so clearly I'm not always the best judge of driving matters! But this isn't my opinion, it's the opinion of the instructors running the course) we were told that it's OK to undertake like that- the person in the "faster" lane should have pulled over as they weren't overtaking.

Shodan · 28/05/2023 00:01

It isn't illegal. The Highway Code makes that very clear by its use of language- illegal actions are headed by the words MUST NOT, in bold type. I'm rather shocked that some people don't appear to know the difference.

It may be deemed careless driving, but it would depend on the traffic in the outside lane/other circumstances. If , for example, the outside lane was as congested as the OP says, it would be unsafe to slow her speed to go in behind the middle lane hogger and then attempt to get into the outside lane, as the OP would have to attempt to match their speed to enter the flow of traffic. It's entirely possible that her manoeuvre would be deemed the safest option given the circumstances.

As an aside, it does infuriate me that people get into the outside lane and stay there. Very poor drivers, all of them. But no doubt they all consider themselves to be amazing drivers.

SinnerBoy · 28/05/2023 00:21

QuintanaRoo · Yesterday 17:51

...and he said he couldn’t undertake. So he’d literally stop on the m25 even though the road was clear. He wouldn’t believe me when I said it was ok to keep going!

On the first bike lesson where I went on a dial carriageway, the left lane was empty and the right lane was full of traffic doing 40 to 45.

I matched their speed and when I came off at the next exit, the instructor stopped me and asked what the Hell I'd been playing at. He told me I should have accelerated to 70 and that it's perfectly legal to do the limit in that situation.

And that if I'd done it on a test, I'd have failed. So, OP drove correctly and legally.

Summerfun54321 · 28/05/2023 00:52

People who thoughtlessly cruise in the middle lane are the same kind of people who change lanes without looking. I did exactly what you did but the middle lane driver pulled straight into me as she moved into the slow lane without looking. I have never undertaken since.

GiveupHQ · 28/05/2023 05:35

Are you and your dad on speaking terms OP since yesterday?

On the basis of this thread, I’m guessing in real life you’re like a dog with a bone and won’t let your poor dad rest until he’s said that he’s wrong and you’re right!

User1529865 · 28/05/2023 06:36

jools85 · 27/05/2023 23:07

My husband is a Driving Instructor, there's no way he'd let me off with this, apparently it's both illegal and extremely dangerous. Your Dad is correct but I totally get where you're coming from 😀

Why are you spouting nonsense, it's not illegal

Aprilx · 28/05/2023 07:09

jools85 · 27/05/2023 23:07

My husband is a Driving Instructor, there's no way he'd let me off with this, apparently it's both illegal and extremely dangerous. Your Dad is correct but I totally get where you're coming from 😀

Your husband should consider a career change, he definitely should not be instructing others if he lacks basic knowledge like this.

Aprilx · 28/05/2023 07:13

AbreathofFrenchair · 27/05/2023 19:50

I never said undertaking was illegal. But if there was an accident because of what she did, she would be at fault. It's on the highway code.

Also, I never said she should weave in and out did I? Of course that would be dangerous so why are you baffled over something I never said?!

There would be no weaving involved, it would be indicate, move over when safe, indicate again, move over when safe, overtake and repeat. That's not weaving that's how you overtake.

If you thinking overtaking on a motorway is weaving in out and out then maybe you need to learn how to do it properly

Whatever word you want to use and I will use weaving, you think that crossing two lanes of traffic and then crossing back again in a short space of time is safer than driving straight in the left lane? Yes I do find that baffling but you decide to focus on the word weaving rather than answer my actual question.

newtowelsplease · 28/05/2023 07:23

Cantthinkofaname2203 · 27/05/2023 16:52

I did a speed awareness course recently and they said undertaking in these circumstances is fine.

you were following the flow of traffic and taking the safest route. It’s the middle lane hogger in the wrong, not you.

100% this. Perfectly fine to keep up with the traffic in your lane. Middle lane hogger at fault here

newtowelsplease · 28/05/2023 07:24

GiveupHQ · 27/05/2023 16:54

You would failed a driving test for overtaking a car on the left. It would have constituted a major error

so there’s your answer

It's not over/undertaking when you don't change lanes.