Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

School says “bring lots of cash”

171 replies

Queestuproblema · 03/05/2023 16:55

I’ll start this by saying I understand schools are underfunded and have been doing Christmas markets/summer fayres/wear x colour for £1 days since even I have been at school. It’s not going to stop but the leaflet we’ve been sent this week quotes:

”Spring market
Come and toast the coronation!
Support our school, bring bags and lots of cash”

AIBU to think the wording of bring lots of cash is completely insensitive to how much everyone is struggling right now? I don’t feel that part was necessary. They could’ve made the leaflet without that surely given some children wont even be able to attend with a few pounds.

OP posts:
Barbecuebeans · 03/05/2023 18:52

Tarantullah · 03/05/2023 17:44

Are you assuming what people think? I grew up in poverty and was never offended or upset by stuff like this but often others would be condescending to my parents and assume they were upset/offended about stuff which was worse. I am also a black woman and people are often offended on behalf on us about things we aren't arsed about.

That must be so infuriating. I can't even imagine what it's like to have people talking on your behalf, as if you can't quite happily talk for yourself.

Cantstandbullshitanymore · 03/05/2023 18:54

Queestuproblema · 03/05/2023 16:55

I’ll start this by saying I understand schools are underfunded and have been doing Christmas markets/summer fayres/wear x colour for £1 days since even I have been at school. It’s not going to stop but the leaflet we’ve been sent this week quotes:

”Spring market
Come and toast the coronation!
Support our school, bring bags and lots of cash”

AIBU to think the wording of bring lots of cash is completely insensitive to how much everyone is struggling right now? I don’t feel that part was necessary. They could’ve made the leaflet without that surely given some children wont even be able to attend with a few pounds.

Some people have really taken the cost of living crisis as an identify and use it to critique everything. relax a little

teaandtoastwithmarmite · 03/05/2023 18:57

Our school usually says no more that £5 or something

Moveoverdarlin · 03/05/2023 18:58

Made me LOL! 🤣

MrsMiddleMother · 03/05/2023 19:01

I agree it's poorly worded but not something I'd be bothered about. People will bring what they can afford whether that's a pound coin or 20 notes

HeadbandOverMyEyes · 03/05/2023 19:04

DarrellRiversCriminalBehaviourOrder · 03/05/2023 18:23

You don't need to work as a professional communications copywriter to see that "bring bags and lots of cash” might come across to some people as a bit tacky or presumptuous, maybe even grabby or crass

No, you just need to be professionally offended and keen to kick a hapless volunteer, who might be from any background, trying to do a good turn for the school in the same difficult environment.

If you're so brilliant at it, I hope you're on the PTA doing that role yourself.

So, noticing that the current well-meant phrasing seems to inadvertently put some people off a bit (which it clearly does, whether you choose to characterise that as people being "professionally offended" or not), exploring the reasons those people might be finding it off-putting, and giving an example of how this sort of thing is often phrased elsewhere in order to avoid annoying people and potentially missing out on revenue — on an anonymous webforum where the original author is very unlikely ever to see it, but where OP hoped it would provoke a discussion, and some people might be interested in why this phrasing has got some people's backs up and how you might avoid doing that — is "kicking a hapless volunteer"?

We all (presumably) want the school to raise as much as possible, while providing a fun experience for the children and avoiding pressuring anyone into giving money they can't afford.

I posted because I think it's really unfortunate if the way a leaflet is phrased might unintentionally offend or annoy someone, and cause a school/PTA to miss out on some potential revenue. I think that conversations about what kind of phrasing and terminology might annoy or offend a certain portion of people, and why, are potentially useful things to have.

You interpret that as vindictive slating of a specific individual (who, yes, might be of any background — I'm not sure whether their background is relevant… I'm sure whatever the background, they'd prefer to know if phrasing things a particular way might affect whether people donate). I'm not sure why you read my post as an attack on a person, rather than a discussion of a phrase. If I'm trying to do some persuasive writing and someone says, "Hey, I know that's not how you meant it, but the way you've written this might not come across as [x] to some people, could it be more likely to get you what you want if you write [y]?" then that's not kicking anyone. Confused

vera99 · 03/05/2023 19:06

Start a thread on MN about it in protest !

PumpkinsAndCoconuts · 03/05/2023 19:06

Sounds fine to me. Bookmarket sounds like a splendid idea.

Better than yet an other sponsored run!!😫
(Although I am quite partial to a good cake sale.)

Dodgeitornot · 03/05/2023 19:09

Fiorione · 03/05/2023 18:43

This kind of attitude is really depressing. Is there a financial threshold for giving a shit about other people?

I'm not sure. I grew up very poor and my other very poor friends also hated this. There is a fine line between advocating for someone and being extremely patronising towards them. This sort of thing assumes that poor people don't have a brain and can't speak up for themselves. I cannot understand why someone would get offended by a fundraiser reminding people to bring cash. If they didn't, people would be upset by that.
I'm sure people will get there and be upset at the prices too. You really can't win and this is one of the many many reasons why teachers are leaving and PTAs are dying out. Parents throwing a fit because they're reminder to bring cash. It's insane.

NotQuiteHere · 03/05/2023 19:10

Yes, silly wording. If you don't like it, you might not go. If you don't go, you don't bring money. Next time the organisers might be more careful with wording. However, some people never learn.

faffadoodledo · 03/05/2023 19:11

If it's a fundraiser it's probably the PTA who came up with the phrase

GalileoHumpkins · 03/05/2023 19:12

Wipe your arse on the leaflet and send it back, cheeky fuckers.

MrsCrustyBread2 · 03/05/2023 19:12

Just choose not to be offended.

Clarabell77 · 03/05/2023 19:17

I was on our school parent council until recently and we were VERY careful about what we charged for fundraising events and how things were worded, especially at the moment, so yes, I agree the bring lots of cash is a bit insensitive.

I also don’t think any school should be encouraging a toast to the coronation. The billions spent on the UKs biggest scroungers could buy a lot of equipment and resources for schools and the NHS.

MrsCrustyBread2 · 03/05/2023 19:18

Clarabell77 · 03/05/2023 19:17

I was on our school parent council until recently and we were VERY careful about what we charged for fundraising events and how things were worded, especially at the moment, so yes, I agree the bring lots of cash is a bit insensitive.

I also don’t think any school should be encouraging a toast to the coronation. The billions spent on the UKs biggest scroungers could buy a lot of equipment and resources for schools and the NHS.

The Royals generate more GDP for the country than they cost.

WilsonMilson · 03/05/2023 19:19

Ds’s school is always fleecing us for cash, it’s par for the course, I couldn’t get worked up about it.

Fundraisers, no uniform days, bake sales, tuck shops, Young Enterprise sales, sponsorships, specially printed t-shirts for events, class equipment contributions, charity collections, food bank donations. It something different every week, and that’s before even thinking about foreign trips, day trips and school fees.
The joys!

DarrellRiversCriminalBehaviourOrder · 03/05/2023 19:20

HeadbandOverMyEyes · 03/05/2023 19:04

So, noticing that the current well-meant phrasing seems to inadvertently put some people off a bit (which it clearly does, whether you choose to characterise that as people being "professionally offended" or not), exploring the reasons those people might be finding it off-putting, and giving an example of how this sort of thing is often phrased elsewhere in order to avoid annoying people and potentially missing out on revenue — on an anonymous webforum where the original author is very unlikely ever to see it, but where OP hoped it would provoke a discussion, and some people might be interested in why this phrasing has got some people's backs up and how you might avoid doing that — is "kicking a hapless volunteer"?

We all (presumably) want the school to raise as much as possible, while providing a fun experience for the children and avoiding pressuring anyone into giving money they can't afford.

I posted because I think it's really unfortunate if the way a leaflet is phrased might unintentionally offend or annoy someone, and cause a school/PTA to miss out on some potential revenue. I think that conversations about what kind of phrasing and terminology might annoy or offend a certain portion of people, and why, are potentially useful things to have.

You interpret that as vindictive slating of a specific individual (who, yes, might be of any background — I'm not sure whether their background is relevant… I'm sure whatever the background, they'd prefer to know if phrasing things a particular way might affect whether people donate). I'm not sure why you read my post as an attack on a person, rather than a discussion of a phrase. If I'm trying to do some persuasive writing and someone says, "Hey, I know that's not how you meant it, but the way you've written this might not come across as [x] to some people, could it be more likely to get you what you want if you write [y]?" then that's not kicking anyone. Confused

You posted to slate some poor volunteer doing their best and try to show how much better a job you could do. As it happens, your own offering was so over-wordy that it probably wouldn't have fitted on the poster, or it would have looked like a total wall of text. And people would have fallen asleep before they got to the end of it.

Nobody who actually prioritises a school fundraiser over their own need to feel offended or superior will refuse to go because some unpaid volunteer who isn't a comms professional used a turn of phrase that some people don't like. Nor will they blame the non-professional volunteer over the school parent who chooses to try to ruin a fundraiser because they were so desperate to be offended and righteous.

Ruth98 · 03/05/2023 19:23

They don't want your money to buy themselves a nice coffee or take a bonus ..its staff and PTA volunteers attending school outside of working hours (i.e. unpaid) to raise money to spend on YOUR children. They're hardly going to check your pockets on the way in to make sure you've brought enough and many of them will be struggling with rising costs too.

Clarabell77 · 03/05/2023 19:24

MrsCrustyBread2 · 03/05/2023 19:18

The Royals generate more GDP for the country than they cost.

Oh dear… that was quick. What next? I’ll take the bank holiday - damn right I will, I’ve done more to earn it than they have.

The full cost of the parasites is actually well hidden, thanks to them making sure they are above the law when it comes to freedom of information.

Any tourism generated is more to do with the buildings etc which would still exist if the monarchy was abolished. No one comes to the country to see them in person. France gets plenty of tourists as a republic, and so would we.

DarrellRiversCriminalBehaviourOrder · 03/05/2023 19:25

Clarabell77 · 03/05/2023 19:17

I was on our school parent council until recently and we were VERY careful about what we charged for fundraising events and how things were worded, especially at the moment, so yes, I agree the bring lots of cash is a bit insensitive.

I also don’t think any school should be encouraging a toast to the coronation. The billions spent on the UKs biggest scroungers could buy a lot of equipment and resources for schools and the NHS.

They're using a public interest news hook to drum up interest in their fundraiser. Coronation stuff is everywhere, it's the obvious theme. Which do you value more, supporting the school or expressing your opposition to the monarchy in an event that doesn't actually make any difference to it?

Jaysus, I'm so glad I refused the volunteering role that involved communicating with members of the public. I do something else instead that means I can be useful without having to take all this crap because I possibly missed a nuance in something I've never done professionally, offending a load of people who can't actually do it any better.

Clarabell77 · 03/05/2023 19:28

Dodgeitornot · 03/05/2023 18:13

I think you win ,😂😂😂 I have an even better idea. Join your local PTA and ensure this sort of thing never happens at your own kids school! You won't have to miss any events that way. The only thing you'll have to part with is your precious time and sanity as you'll experience what it's like to deal with parents just like you.

We shouldn’t need to fundraisers for essential items for our schools and the scroungers are part of the problem.

DarrellRiversCriminalBehaviourOrder · 03/05/2023 19:32

Clarabell77 · 03/05/2023 19:28

We shouldn’t need to fundraisers for essential items for our schools and the scroungers are part of the problem.

I'm not a royalist myself, but the reason schools need more money is not because of the Royal Family.

At any rate, even if it were, you complaining about a coronation fundraiser and refusing to support it makes no difference to Charles and only punishes the school.

MrsCrustyBread2 · 03/05/2023 19:38

Clarabell77 · 03/05/2023 19:24

Oh dear… that was quick. What next? I’ll take the bank holiday - damn right I will, I’ve done more to earn it than they have.

The full cost of the parasites is actually well hidden, thanks to them making sure they are above the law when it comes to freedom of information.

Any tourism generated is more to do with the buildings etc which would still exist if the monarchy was abolished. No one comes to the country to see them in person. France gets plenty of tourists as a republic, and so would we.

People won't be travelling to the UK from across the globe, staying in hotels, and eating at restaurants in London to stare at an empty building this weekend. They're coming to try and catch a glimpse of the King and so they can say that they were here during his Coronation.

HeadbandOverMyEyes · 03/05/2023 19:38

Dodgeitornot · 03/05/2023 18:29

@HeadbandOverMyEyes What about being inclusive to all the parents who's first language isn't English? Those who may be illiterate? Your advert is very wordy. Bring lots of cash is much easier to understand.
can you see that you can't please everyone?

Yes, I know it's wordy. It was an example of the kind of phrasing I've seen a million times on this sort of thing, not My Superior Alternative. I considered including a shorter version too (or instead), but decided that for a quick MN post — where I'm not claiming to be putting forth suggested wording, just trying to hold the OP's example next to a more common or typical way of phrasing this kind of thing — a version which bolds the most important parts would do.

If this thread were about providing information in formats accessible to those with difficulties extracting information from large chunks of text, I'd have plenty to say about it. I'm reasonably confident I've done more pressuring and campaigning on that front than the majority of those on this thread. But the thread is about phrasing that the OP, and some others, find offensive, insulting, annoying, insensitive, or otherwise offputting, to one degree or another, not reading ability. I found it interesting to think about things like, for example, how the interpretation of the meaning "cash" affects the level of formality, which might affect whether people feel their money is being respected.

I think that the response "can you see that you can't please everyone" is a bit of a cop-out. Apart from the fact that I'm not trying to please anyone and posted because I think it's an interesting topic rather than because I have fayre leaflets to write, if I was told that my phrasing for something like this might have soured some people against my fundraising event, no matter how unreasonable I thought that offence-taking might be, I'd want to at least think about whether there was an alternative that met the same requirements but didn't put those people off. I wouldn't think "Hmm… when some random person on Mumsnet typed something phrased differently for comparison, it was too long and a bit shit — ah well, can't please everyone, so we'll stick with the one that some people found offputting." I might even decide to stick with my original phrasing.

Funny thing is, I don't even personally find it offensive 😅 I just got my interest piqued and started thinking about why some people might.

Dodgeitornot · 03/05/2023 19:39

@HeadbandOverMyEyes I really cannot be bothered to read your essay. I'm sure you're a lovely person irl. Take care.