Just to preface this by saying this wasn't some almighty row but a difference of opinion that I'd like other's thoughts on!
I also want to say I really do understand that we are in a very fortunate position to be even discussing this and many are struggling just to pay the bills. So I really thought about posting this but I genuinely want to see if I'm being unreasonable.
We are married, 2 DC and have separate accounts, joint savings but very much what's mine is yours when it comes to paying for bills/things.
I am the breadwinner and pay 90% of the bills incl food. I have absolutely no problem with this as DH puts money into savings (an agreed amount) and overpays the mortgage (an agreed amount)
I am lucky enough to have money left over after bills. DP also has money left over after putting money into savings/mortgage overpayments. The amounts are roughly the same
Pretty much every month I spend what I have left. New clothes for DC, we might do activities at the weekend, days out, meals out etc. This sounds excessive but I literally mean swimming, football hobbies, new shoes, lunch out at cafe at the park, big day out maybe once a month in town, a couple of nights out with friends etc.
DH doesn't spend much of his disposable income and instead tops up the savings.
Recently he has suggested I should save some of my disposable income and cut back on what I spend. He has suggested the DC don't need to do as much as they do, we could do more at home, nights out with friends could be inviting them here for drinks instead etc
I disagree. I worked really bloody hard to get a decent salary pre kids as I knew my career would stall. We are lucky enough to be able to save and still have money left over and I feel strongly that I worked to put us in the position where we could eat out, enjoy ourselves and still have a nest egg. I don't see why we should cut back when we don't need to.
YANBU: it's his choice to save his money and you can spend as you'd like
YABU: you should match his additional savings and cut back