Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Size discrimination in workplace

153 replies

GEC44 · 23/03/2023 12:37

Looking at another current thread on here regarding being weighed in the office, it's made me want to post about my employer.

The role is a uniformed role.

New uniform was recently issued and a memo went out a few weeks beforehand to ask any female members of staff size 18 or above to attend a measuring session in a meeting room, as the uniform supplier doesn't go past size 16 and so anything bigger would need to be specially made.

I found this to be quite humiliating. Fair enough if the supplier doesn't go past a certain size, but the employer could have been a bit more discreet about it rather than getting all the size 18 plus ladies in for a "measuring session".

OP posts:
NalafromtheLionKing · 23/03/2023 13:38

harkerlee · 23/03/2023 13:25

Well it's not discrimination but definitely insensitive, you shouldn't have to be measured in front of other people and have your clothes size shared/ a thing made out of it.

I would politely point out that it's not very sensitive and a discreet one-to-one appointment system would be better.

This. Otherwise it’s all a bit ‘all fatties together’ (not how I feel btw, I just know that I would feel uncomfortable in the circs the OP describes).

vivainsomnia · 23/03/2023 13:41

I found this to be quite humiliating
Why? You are the size you are. Presumably, you are very good at your job like the others. Size isn't an issue, they just need to make sure they order the right size from another retailer who might be making them individually, so returns and exchanges not as flexible as lower sizes.

Don't make it about you. Go with your head high. If you don't want others to know your measurements, ask for it not to be said loudly and just written down where others can't see.

5128gap · 23/03/2023 13:47

TheObstinateHeadstrongGirl · 23/03/2023 13:32

So the company should be paying for tailored outfits for everyone in order to not offend size 18+ people knowing that they’re size 18+?

No. They should be doing it so not to offend the under size 18s by making them wear ill fitting generic uniforms while their colleagues get tailored ones.

TiaraBoo · 23/03/2023 14:08

They should have samples of the standard sizes so people can try them on (before requesting a nice tailored uniform!)

Tealsofa · 23/03/2023 14:12

TaunterOfWomenInGeneralSaysSayonarastu · 23/03/2023 13:08

It is discrimination.

As it stands, ONLY women size 18+ will be going to the measuring room.

But the email was a general email, probably not just to the over18s (I'm on) and I would think the over 18s will be self identifying, no one will be rounding them up with a lasso

Size 18 is unlikely to be a healthy size (I say that as someone aiming to be a 14)

Bamboux · 23/03/2023 14:12

CommanderSeven · 23/03/2023 13:01

I don't know about that. I'm a size 18 and whenever I tell people that I get loads of really, really shocked faces and "NO you are NOT" comments.

When I tell them my weight the same thing happens.

People pass on clothes to me that are far too small!

So it's not always obvious.

Um. That's social politeness.

LonginesPrime · 23/03/2023 14:13

Ponderingwindow · 23/03/2023 13:11

They really should just measure everyone because sizing isn’t that standardized in women’s clothing.

I do think that choosing a supplier that only goes to size 16 is itself discrimination. It will take some new employees longer to get uniforms than others. Not everyone will have equal access to replacement pieces.

But they have plenty of uniforms up to a size 16 available, so when they deliver, if someone tries on a 12 and actually needs a 14, they can likely just swap it - the only ones that need to be measured are the ones they have to custom make, as they don't carry those sizes as standard and are making them to order.

It seems like it would push the whole cost of the service up significantly if they insisted on measuring everyone to provide a solution to a problem that doesn't exist - people in the sizes they carry can just swap one size for another quite easily so there's no need for the tailor to measure them.

Paq · 23/03/2023 14:17

Allthegoodnamesarechosen · 23/03/2023 12:53

I don’t think your size is a secret ( said as a fellow 18j

This. People have eyes. Also, no one cares what size you are, just whether you do your job well and are nice to your colleagues.

Rinkydinkydoodle · 23/03/2023 14:21

OP, I don’t see why they couldn’t measure everyone tbh. If it’s not cost effective to provide a full size range or measure everyone then they should find a different fucking supplier. A size 18 is widely available in most chain stores, it’s hardly rare. As a 12/14 with an ass that won’t quit I’d be wanting measured too if I caught wind of the tailored option, but I can see why it’s bugged you, it doesn’t feel inclusive.

GEC44 · 23/03/2023 14:29

Tealsofa · 23/03/2023 14:12

But the email was a general email, probably not just to the over18s (I'm on) and I would think the over 18s will be self identifying, no one will be rounding them up with a lasso

Size 18 is unlikely to be a healthy size (I say that as someone aiming to be a 14)

"Size 18 is unlikely to be a healthy size (I say that as someone aiming to be a 14)"

Completely irrelevant.

OP posts:
TheObstinateHeadstrongGirl · 23/03/2023 14:40

5128gap · 23/03/2023 13:47

No. They should be doing it so not to offend the under size 18s by making them wear ill fitting generic uniforms while their colleagues get tailored ones.

Whilst that’s a lovely idea (who doesn’t like a tailored outfit!) realistically the company won’t be forming out for every uniform to be tailored when they only need pay for a few

RandomUsernameHere · 23/03/2023 14:52

Seems odd to me that they don't just find a supplier that stocks bigger sizes. Size 18 isn't that big and certainly isn't unusual.

CommanderSeven · 23/03/2023 14:53

@Bamboux I can tell the difference between genuine shock and "social politeness".

I am tall (well I don't think I'm tall, but other people do) at 5'7" which helps

I'm also broad shouldered and have been in the past (not now) extremely fit.

Daisymae55 · 23/03/2023 15:00

I’m a costume maker and often receive wrong measurements from the cast. People aren’t great at measuring themselves and often don’t know exactly where to take a measurement. I stopped allowing this early in my career

i do however agree that everyone should have been measured, not just those over a specific size. Eliminates any discrimination but also sizes vary so much it reduces the chance of the wrong size being ordered

Mercurial123 · 23/03/2023 15:09

There's not a lot to be unhappy about. You're getting a tailored uniform which will be more flattering than your colleagues below a size 18. Some people love to be offended.

Butteryflakycrust83 · 23/03/2023 15:16

I wouldn't be embarrassed - people have eyes and can see I am over a size 18 and I don't think my size is a problem.

I think it could have perhaps been worded better, such as 'As there are restrictions on sizing, we would like to invite all who may need a different sized uniform to please attend a session with the tailor on X to ensure we get you the correct fit.'

Nothing to be embarrassed about, and if anyone made any detrimental comments I would not hesitate to sing like a canary to HR.

lunar1 · 23/03/2023 15:24

I can't believe the employer isn't using a uniform with a bigger size range, do you work in a clothing shop that caps at 16?

All this could be solved if retailers were forced to change women's clothing to sizes in CM. Depending on the shop I can be a 14/16/18, because its such a pain I order 99% of my clothes from next where I know I can order a 16 and have plenty of room or a 14 if I want a more tailored look.

QCKC · 23/03/2023 15:26

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

What would possess you to write such a cruel thing?

Butteryflakycrust83 · 23/03/2023 15:27

QCKC · 23/03/2023 15:26

What would possess you to write such a cruel thing?

Fat isnt a bad word?

Everyone has fat on their bodies.

Its a neutral term - its the intention of the person that makes it cruel.

Tealsofa · 23/03/2023 15:32

GEC44 · 23/03/2023 14:29

"Size 18 is unlikely to be a healthy size (I say that as someone aiming to be a 14)"

Completely irrelevant.

I've just been 30 mins in the dentist chair, so forgot why I wrote this

TheObstinateHeadstrongGirl · 23/03/2023 15:38

Butteryflakycrust83 · 23/03/2023 15:27

Fat isnt a bad word?

Everyone has fat on their bodies.

Its a neutral term - its the intention of the person that makes it cruel.

Yep. No one is doing themselves favours pretending themselves and others aren’t what they are

Newestname002 · 23/03/2023 15:44

female members of staff size 18

Did a similar note go out to males? 🌹

Hubblebubble · 23/03/2023 15:49

Tone can be hard to carry across, so I'll just mention this is kindly meant. Do you feel ashamed or embarrassed about being over a size 16? If you don't, then what's wrong with going to the fitting?

TheObstinateHeadstrongGirl · 23/03/2023 15:54

Newestname002 · 23/03/2023 15:44

female members of staff size 18

Did a similar note go out to males? 🌹

Presumably the uniform is a dress

lieselotte · 23/03/2023 16:03

People who are overweight are often discriminated against in all kinds of ways (especially in medical contexts) and have little recourse precisely because it’s not legally a protected characteristic

Yes but it can be changed. You can lose weight. If you have a condition that means you can't lose weight, that is a protected characteristic.

It's not obesity that is the last bastion of acceptable discrimination, it's height, and there's nothing you can do about that. You can't eat more to grow upwards (only outwards!)