why would it cause mass panic and injury?
Other countries use these alerts and they save lives
Arer the UK population particularly low intelligence do you think? Is that what you are arguing? We are too thick to cope with being given safety instructions in an emergency???
We could have certainly used this in the local wild fires we had last summer, and are likely to have again, it isn't a once in a 1000 year occurrence, is it? Nor are flash floods, which are becoming ever more likely and ever more dangerous. Toxic pollution happens quite regularly all around the word too.
You are making absolutely no sense.
first argument - we don't suffer natural disasters- yes we do, and will do more so, and this isn't just for natural disasters, but many other (manmade) eventualities, such as a toxic pollution incident, etc.
second argument - we can get the information from the news - but only if it is constantly being checked, so noone who is working, or asleep, or away from the TV for any reason, such as having a life.
third argument - "in the grand scheme of things" "there are more important things to worry about" - more important than safety information that can cheaply and easily save lives in a deadly emergency - right. Ok
fourth argument - the UK population is too thick to cope with being given safety information in an emergency - well, if you genuinely feel you personally are too thick to cope with being given safety information in an emergency, then by all means, cut yourself off from it, but most normal people wont.
Like I said, it is people who somehow think that reflexive noncompliance makes them clever and superior that is against this, not anyone who actually has the sense to properly think about it and evaluate it