@pinkySilver
*Those people on the cruises didn't have any paid childcare, possibly no mat leave, very little sick pay, were much less likely to access health care when young and only went to the GP when really ill etc etc. That's not a prid pro quo but it's important to remember that not all older people have had a fun-filled easy time on someone else's dollar.
People live longer now - they rarely drop dead two years after retiring - which they used to do. It's good to work - we should all be contributing in whatever way we can. And we should be preparing for when we can't rather than expecting someone else to do it.
Setting up older people against younger people doesn't help us as a society though. And none of knows what's in store.*
Very true.
I'll be able to retire earlier than state pension age because I've worked full time, including through the era of 12 week maternity leave, no paternity leave, no subsidised childcare, mortgage rates regularly in double figures... oh and I pay 12 % of my salary into an occupational pension.
There's upsides and downsides in every generation.
My adult kids will probably have to work longer than me, but they also benefit from advantages that my generation didn't have.
And while my parents (now in their 90s) were able to afford a SAHP, there were huge downsides - hardly any regulated childcare back in their day for a start. My mother had no opportunity to have a career whether she wanted one or not!
It's pointless to try to pit one generation against another like this