Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think a lot of posts on this social services Facebook group can’t be entirely truthful?

212 replies

TheObstinateHeadstrongGirl · 22/02/2023 19:18

5 years ago, my DD made a disclosure about a family friend which we reported to the police. As a result we had children’s services involved in our lives and had a horrendous excuse for a social worker who cast doubt of my DD’s experience. FWIW: I know the vast majority of social workers are excellent, sadly we had a very brief experience with a really incompetent one, so I’m not in the “all social workers are evil” camp. I can’t imagine how hard it must be to do that job in a broken country with failing systems.

Anyway, at the time I joined a Facebook support group for those who have children’s services involved to get advice on how to handle everything that was going on. I never left the group, for no particular reason. And for some reason Facebook’s algorithm have been putting the posts on my feed more recently.

Some of the posts are very strange.

Posters claiming they’re on a child protection plan because their relatives are in the army. Or because they have a messy house. Some claim they don’t know why they’re at PLO level (which is a pre-cursor to court action). Loads of posts claiming SS are involved for no reason whatsoever, including pregnant women who look like they’re gonna have their babies removed and they don’t know why. Not all obviously but a large amount claim this.

AIBU to think that children aren’t placed on the child protection register for living in a messy house and there must be more to it?

OP posts:
TheObstinateHeadstrongGirl · 28/02/2023 12:36

bluelollipop99 · 28/02/2023 09:45

Actually, a question to @Brieandme and to the other social workers on here who would refuse to be recorded when interviewing parents ?

You accept the police cannot even interview a suspect r.e shoplifting ( when the penalty would likely be a caution or some other low level punishment), without being recorded ?

Yet social workers can conduct parenting assessments, interview extremely vulnerable people , ( parents who may have learning disabilities, mental illness, be under 18 etc) , to decide whether to take them court to seek the permanent removal of their children / unborn children, ( a lot more serious than any of the outcomes likely for your low level shoplifter above ) , and it is considered outrageous for the social worker to be expected to record what is said in these interviews to prevent circular he said/ she said arguments at court ?

Why is this considered okay ?

This is a good point.

I often think if you don’t have the nouse to challenge lies, to correct errors and to stand up for yourself you’d be fucked if SS came into your life.

OP posts:
TheObstinateHeadstrongGirl · 28/02/2023 12:37

bluelollipop99 · 28/02/2023 10:03

But on the other hand @LilLilLi , many parents ask for interviews to be recorded because the soical worker has previously been untruthful. Of course parents should have the right to decline filming on their property, but is it right that SS refuse even the option of recording interviews etc if that's what they'd like ? How does it inspire trust if SS insist they have the right to interview parents, but unlike a police interview, patents have no right to even request a recorded copy ?

Surely you can record whatever you like in your home? It just wouldn’t be treated as something official

OP posts:
LilLilLi · 28/02/2023 13:37

bluelollipop99 · 28/02/2023 10:03

But on the other hand @LilLilLi , many parents ask for interviews to be recorded because the soical worker has previously been untruthful. Of course parents should have the right to decline filming on their property, but is it right that SS refuse even the option of recording interviews etc if that's what they'd like ? How does it inspire trust if SS insist they have the right to interview parents, but unlike a police interview, patents have no right to even request a recorded copy ?

I can honestly say that in all the core meetings I’ve sat through and all the visits I’ve done never has someone asked for the interaction to be recorded.

I can only speak for myself obviously, others may have different experiences.

countrygirl99 · 28/02/2023 13:53

My experience of "lying" by social workers (although this is elder care rather than children) is someone wilfully misinterpreting what was said and then having a hissy fit because they don't get what they want. So FIL would ask for something, be told "it's highly unlikely we would be able to do that " and take it as a promise it would be done and then have a hossy fit when it didn't happen. Original conversation witnessed by other family members. Then he would tell everyone SS had gone back on promises and get sympathy from his mates.

Purpleflowerseverywhere · 28/02/2023 14:20

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

BrieAndChilli · 28/02/2023 14:45

it is really hard to comprehend but having read a few studies recently, some people just do not have the same mental ability as others - they can not think things through in the same way or comprehend certain ideas or points of view. I just thought soome people were idiots but actually they just cannot process things in the same way.
I think they truly believe what they are saying but just cant see that dirty dishes and animal waste is not just 'normal clutter'.

AnnaKorine · 28/02/2023 17:03

These stories are unsurprising when lack of insight of the parents is one of the main reasons they can’t make the necessary changes to provide good enough parenting to their children. If they understood and addressed them then they wouldn’t be in this situation.

There are of course many shades of grey and some possibly unfair decisions at the margins.

MGK · 28/02/2023 17:07

My house is messy and I've had professionals come round and they've never involved SS so obviously more to it than that.

Tandora · 28/02/2023 17:13

So you have had a terrible experience with SS but don’t believe others when they share theirs?

I think YAB way more U than you realise unfortunately

TheObstinateHeadstrongGirl · 28/02/2023 17:42

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Babies absolutely do get removed at birth if there is a belief of significant risk of harm.

Leiland James being one

OP posts:
TheObstinateHeadstrongGirl · 28/02/2023 17:44

Tandora · 28/02/2023 17:13

So you have had a terrible experience with SS but don’t believe others when they share theirs?

I think YAB way more U than you realise unfortunately

I have said I can well believe people get an incompetent social worker. But I’m afraid I do find it hard to believe that children are at risk of being removed just because their house is a bit messy on one occasion.

OP posts:
Allthegoodnamesarechosen · 28/02/2023 17:52

I suppose it is easier and more comfortable to deny or minimise; because if you admitted it, you might feel obliged to do something about it, or at least accept some responsibility for the consequences of your actions or inactions.

Much , much more comfortable to deny it, or make up a story about victimisation.

Throwncrumbs · 28/02/2023 18:13

DONTMESSWITHMEDARNA · 23/02/2023 04:42

there are many innocent people being targets by nasty toxic workers
y
i had 2 and half years of hell from a toxic nasty bitch of a worker who personally disliked my life style choices and lied and made up so much shit on her first report.

no one checks these reports to see if what they are saying are true. well her manager didn't anyway.

she turned up after a fake referral from whoever(boy if i knew who did it) saying my at the time 10y old wasn't attending the local school.
we home educate and hes never been in school. all legal and millions home ed

from very first meeting,where she pushed passed me at the door she tried to bully me and talk down to me, im not that person(im a major alpha female type)and would not take her shit. i told her very firmly to leave and on leaving she turned and practically spat at me and said that's it bitch im getting you.

with in the same day they were put on a CPP for parenting and educational neglect, her reasons, you ready for this?

BECAUSE i follow attachment gentle parenting and home educate.
this was april 20 so in the first lockdown, where no one was attending school
she would visit 4 times a week on her way home from work so technically out of work(never let in though,always ignored as none was legally scheduled )i would wake up to phone calls and voice mails from her demanding me to tell her my education plans for today and as unschoolers that's not how it works.i found out later even on her days off so even sat in her own hose i was on her mind

my boys have many disabilities each and oldest was diagnosed in 2012,this bitch tried to say its all in my head and im only doing for dla money(didnt mater that i was a 24/7 carer as hes that severe)and tried to get them overturned.
she even bullied the doctors receptionist.

surgery put in a complaint in about this

she though she could bully me in to doing t hings how she saw fit

if i disagreed with anything she said or even answered back or even quote laws she would threated an emergency care order with in the hour,this happened numerous times a week.
it would nev3er change my answer as 1 i eqas right and 2 it was laws that you can easily google

i found out afterwards its not that simple but i didnt know that at the time,she was nasty enough to do it

at meeting i and the solicitor would quote home education laws at her and she wouldn't accept it and would repeat and repeat well i dont agree with it so im not listening or accepting them you WILL do this how i tell you

they are laws for the whole uk and this bitch thought her personal opinion was above them.the solicitor was gob smacked after every meeting and would, put his own complaints in about her as she treated him the same way

her manager was just as corrupt and believe the whole lies of reports or just didn't bother to get them checked.

youngest was 4 years of fertility treatment as i don't/didn't see periods due to sever PCOS(im 42 and never seen one) i was called a liar about that. even though there's medical reports which the solicitor provided ands she accused him of doctoring them up

he was also 11lb11oz and 29 inches born i was told im making that up i bet he was about 5 llbs as no babies that big ,she shut up when i showed her proof.

i found out later they are trained in gaslighting

i fought them all the way with the help of a great solicitor who in 35 years of fighting SS he never came across one as biased and obnoxious as her and thought she was above he law and how unprofessional she was.

we did stage 1,2 and 3 complaints against them both. stage 3 are severe and after a long battle both got fired for using personal beliefs over professional and corrupt behaviour and using her job as a personal vendetta

i joined those groups desperate for help as before i though SS only got involved when there was a reason . boy was i wrong there are so many innocent families targeted because a SW don't like you or don't parent how they see fit.

im a living reason to say its not the case and SW will do what they can and what ever they want to get you on plans. if she followed the laws and regulations she had zero reason to put them on any list/plan

i had her,without my permission sign me up on a authoritative parent course for under 5s(boy were 10 and 16)as that's what she followed and following gentle/attachment parenting since 04 this wasnt happening,she even want as far as to enrol both kids in to the local school and 6th form,6th form was 40 minutes away so no idea why the school accepted that, we think she pretended to be the parent

both school got involved after that and complained as they were used in her path of personal destruction.

so as the doctors,and schools was being used as her tool to hit me with all this was used as evidence.and my very lengthy detailed complaints(as i recorded every conversation and written communication) and the solicitors

all this caused me to have an emotional breakdown,both kids trauma and with the help of said solicitor in the process of claiming compensation against SS for allowing these people(ie SW and manager) to get away with this behaviour and the manager not checking enough on her workers behaviour/illegal practices

i was just annoyed it took 2 and half years of fighting this toxic bitch to get heard.

so after a very long personal story(people need to know these thing do happen so that's why im writing this ),yes there are many innocent parent being target by nasty social workers and the whole corrupt system.

i was one of the lucky ones,not once was my kids taken away just the threat of it as at one point she tried the FII route(Fabricated or induced illness)googled it its bad

Home education isn’t for you I’m afraid, your English is shocking!

Purpleflowerseverywhere · 28/02/2023 18:18

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

countrygirl99 · 28/02/2023 18:25

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

DH has a friend who fosters babies that are removed at birth. They are virtually all bor addicted to drugs.

Purpleflowerseverywhere · 28/02/2023 18:31

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Brieandme · 28/02/2023 18:35

@bluelollipop99 I've referred to this on the thread earlier and I'm not sure why it's been ignored, but however much people like to frame social workers as being 'the child protection police' our job is not characterised by interviewing/interrogating parents.
The majority of the conversations we have are about trying to understand behaviour and change behaviour or support families to develop plans.

We leave the investigating to the police. There are certain points in child protection where things are recorded - but minuted rather than audio recording - such as child protection conferences, plo meetings (where parents have a solicitor present) for example.

Again as I've mentioned earlier my main objection to recording is that it wouldn't work and wouldn't benefit the family. At others have said, families aren't likely to open up to us. Many of the accusations about lies are about different interpretations of things said rather than a direct lie. Unless recorded in a proper studio with proper processes, audio recording wouldn't be acceptable as 'evidence' - eg a parent could claim it's not them, the audio is too poor etc. The processes for audio recording by the police are very very formal and rightly so. We wouldn't be able to do our jobs if that is how we approached every interaction with a family.

I've done two meetings and a visit with different families today. None of them involved grilling a parent about suspected child abuse. Two involved working with parents where domestic abuse was a feature about how we can support them and reduce the likelihood of the children being affected, one was to a vulnerable parent with mental health issues. None of that would benefit from audio recording. Yes there could be something unexpected that crops up, but it would be disproportionate to record everyone 'just in case'.

TheObstinateHeadstrongGirl · 28/02/2023 18:36

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Well yes that’s exactly the point I’m trying to make as you said children aren’t removed due to risk of future harm. They are

OP posts:
Throwncrumbs · 28/02/2023 18:40

otherwayup · 23/02/2023 09:41

@sashh
I understand the concept of unschooling. I think it's a crock of shit but I also understand not everyone parents the same way!

What I do find disturbing is parents inflicting a very poor education on their children.
Life is way harder for adults who have poor literacy skills and I sadly see this at work. It can have a huge outcome on an individual's potential.

It’s a way of your kids never bettering themselves, never being able to hold done a job, not knowing how to budget …just like the parents who spout this shite, life’s better on benefits when you are as thick as mince!

Emmamoo89 · 28/02/2023 18:40

Aphrathestorm · 23/02/2023 08:39

There are bad apples in SW just like every other profession.

There are people who should have SW who don't and people who shouldn't who do.

Assessments are very subjective.

Advice I'd give to anyone involved is smile, nod, agree to everything they say and wait it out til they go.

Couldn't agree more with this

Brieandme · 28/02/2023 18:41

I forgot to add, again I mentioned this earlier but in terms of parents recording, I won't and don't agree to it the sole reason that I've been recorded in secret before and that information has been used, edited (to remove context) and shared publicly, breaking the child's confidentially. A whole community posting on Facebook about how outraged they are does not help a child. It doesn't result in 'justice' for the family. What i will do if a parent tells me they're worried about me lying, is I'll try and agree some other means to mitigate that worry - by typing a summary of key points discussed and agreeing any corrections and sharing it before I leave. Or that they can have someone else with them at any visits/meetings. But, and I get people might not believe me about this, it's very rare that I've been accused of lying by families. A big part of what I do is be really transparent with parents - being direct about what my concerns are, as well as what I see the positives are. Be honest about what WOULD make me concerned enough to want to start the process of removal. By asking parents to check paperwork that I share. Unsurprisingly if you offer basic respect to people are honest and transparent with them they are far less likely to accuse you of lying/of hiding things.

countrygirl99 · 28/02/2023 18:42

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Yep. Not something done lightly.

Purpleflowerseverywhere · 28/02/2023 18:47

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

TheObstinateHeadstrongGirl · 28/02/2023 18:49

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

But they haven’t harmed THAT child - children DO get removed at birth for risk of potential harm, even if they’ve never so much as had a glass of sneery at Christmas or a sneaky cig in pregnancy

OP posts:
MillicentTrilbyHiggins · 28/02/2023 18:55

I'm just place making so I can come back later when I'm off the bus and share my experience with SS.

Swipe left for the next trending thread