On MN we see real hatred toward cyclists & runners in parks and canal paths, in other words people who exercise!!! its pathetic, these are real people, husbands wives, sons daughters, nurses, doctors, engineers, carers, trades people etc etc yet posters here and RL call them scum, road lice, w@nkers... they are us!!!.
Agreed.
The cyclist logic is always an amusing argument:
Cyclists should not be on the roads because they slow important drivers down.
Cyclists definitely shouldn't cycle 2 side by side, which allows cars to do one safe overtake. They should string out so that impatient drivers can squeeze past without having to go on the other side of the road.
Cyclists should not be riding towards the middle of the lane because that forces cars to do a proper and safe overtake. They should be in the gutter with all the grit, leaving limited room to move if(when) an arse of a driver overtakes dangerously.
Cyclists should definitely be on cycle paths, even if the cycle paths aren't fit for purpose
Cyclists should not be on the cycle paths because being on the cycle paths because people need to walk across them/their DC want to play on them/they don't want to supervise their DC and keep them on the correct side/their dog likes to run all over the cycle path.
Cyclists using the cycle path should be going at snail pace because anything else is zooming around thinking they're in the tour de France.
Cyclists also should not wear lycra because some mumsnetters care when strangers wear exercise gear for their activity.
If a man is wearing lycra it's perfectly fine to cackle at his body and make nasty body-shaming comments about MAMILS, how disgusting their bodies are and how nobody wants to see that.