Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think you should downsize your council house if it’s just you?

1000 replies

OuchOuchOuchh · 12/01/2023 09:58

Oh my goodness I have created war at work and everyone is gunning for me.

My auntie has a huge 4 bedroom council house she has lived there since the 90s with her one son. That has now moved out.

All i said was I think it’s unfair that she’s living in such a big family home perfect for a family to bring their kids up in. Large garden backs on to the woods plenty of visits from deers and fox’s it’s beautiful! Anyway all I said is that if you haven’t purchased the property in a certain amount of time you should have to downsize if it’s just you living there.

Theres families overcrowded and can’t get anywhere then you have my auntie paying £100 a week in rent for a massive house for just herself.

please tell me if I am being an asshole! I appreciate it’s her family home but it just doesn’t seem fair to me.

OP posts:
babsanderson · 12/01/2023 16:53

@Kabalagala I own my house. How are you going to make me move?

And how will you make council tenants move who under contract law have a right to stay?

Kabalagala · 12/01/2023 16:54

babsanderson · 12/01/2023 16:52

A nice bungalow around the corner is what most people want. It is what I want.
You want people to move far away from where they live to a not very nice area or somewhere where they do not know anyone?

If people want exactly what they want, they need to pay for it privately.
Social housing should for fulfilling needs before preferences.

midgetastic · 12/01/2023 16:54

Suppose old people die at a fixed rate
And younger people become old at a fixed rate

You move all older people out this yea rather than wait for them to die - you free up say 10 new homes for families

But next year those 10 old people don't die and free up their homes so all you have are the usual number of people becoming old

So you don't really get many more homes in the pool anyway

AllThingsServeTheBeam · 12/01/2023 16:55

Kabalagala · 12/01/2023 16:54

If people want exactly what they want, they need to pay for it privately.
Social housing should for fulfilling needs before preferences.

You're saying all this... But the law literally doesn't agree with you

AllThingsServeTheBeam · 12/01/2023 16:56

babsanderson · 12/01/2023 16:52

A nice bungalow around the corner is what most people want. It is what I want.
You want people to move far away from where they live to a not very nice area or somewhere where they do not know anyone?

Exactly!

EpicChaos · 12/01/2023 16:56

Jonnywishbone · 12/01/2023 16:31

So in your example of a council house rented out for decades the council did zero maintenance?

And how often exactly, do councils do any major modernising of properties?
You seem to forget that tenants spend time and money on their homes too.

babsanderson · 12/01/2023 16:56

@Kabalagala I own my own home.

But you are proposing breaking the law. Glad you are not my landlord.

AlecTrevelyan006 · 12/01/2023 16:56

I worked in social housing for many years. We managed around 8,000 properties and I think that no more than 5% were one-bed places. In most cases they’re not really cost effective for the long term. You’re better off having 2, 3 and 4 bed properties even if at times they are not full.

AllThingsServeTheBeam · 12/01/2023 16:57

Kabalagala · 12/01/2023 16:51

They shouldn't have a choice. I'm not expecting people to volunteer.

They shouldn't have a choice.... Fucking... Hell...

Cuppasoupmonster · 12/01/2023 16:58

AllThingsServeTheBeam · 12/01/2023 16:27

And thankfully the government doesn't agree with you 🙂

My nan I rightly in her HA bungalow. Is happy. Paid in her whole life and doesn't owe moving out to a single person. And it won't change. Not for people with tenancies already

‘Paid in’ to what? She’s paid cheap rent. That doesn’t ‘entitle’ her to anything.

Kabalagala · 12/01/2023 16:58

AllThingsServeTheBeam · 12/01/2023 16:55

You're saying all this... But the law literally doesn't agree with you

That's because I'm not talking about does happen. I'm talking about what should happen.

Fuwari · 12/01/2023 16:58

Ultimately you can all debate as much as you want on what is "fair". The many threads on this topic show it's hotly debated.

The facts are though, that they tried shorter tenancies. Didn't work. the administrative costs were too great. So now they've gone back to giving out lifetime tenancies again.

Bleating on about it on MN isn't going to change that. But carry on.

AllThingsServeTheBeam · 12/01/2023 16:59

Cuppasoupmonster · 12/01/2023 16:58

‘Paid in’ to what? She’s paid cheap rent. That doesn’t ‘entitle’ her to anything.

Tax and national insurance. She used to own her own home. She doesn't pay cheap rent. She pays what the council ask of her. She doesn't receive any benefits. Carry on frothing though

Eyerollcentral · 12/01/2023 16:59

Adviceneeded200 · 12/01/2023 16:35

I agree. I know someone elderly living with her disabled husband and they would be very much better off in a small council bungalow- 1 or 2 bedrooms. They definitely deserve a council property but it should be appropriate to their requirements and free up a family home.

They still.live in a large 4 bedroomed with a garage (they don't drive) and garden (they struggle to even cut the grass.....we know them because we end up cutting it for them as a "favour" year 4 this year!) And her daughter and partner still live with her when they earn enough to rent somewhere themselves.

How do you know what’s ‘better for them’??? So their daughter and her partner live in the house therefore it’s fully occupied. Struggling to understand your point. If doing your neighbour a simple favour that you offered is too much for you, I really don’t know what to say but your take is bizarre to say the least.

AllThingsServeTheBeam · 12/01/2023 17:00

Kabalagala · 12/01/2023 16:58

That's because I'm not talking about does happen. I'm talking about what should happen.

People forcefully removed from their homes against their will and made to live miles away from where they were ... Hmmm good job you're not in charge innit.

Snowpatrolling · 12/01/2023 17:01

I agree and I’m in council housing. They’ve changed things up in my area, they review your housing every 5 years, if you are deemed to have more room than you need you are downsized. They bought new contracts in about 5 years ago.
I work in community care and the amount of single people in 3/4 bedroom houses whilst I’m overcrowded and need an extra bedroom due to medical needs is quite infuriating. I am obviously grateful to have a roof over my head of course.
we will be moved to a 3 bed this year and once the kids move out I will happily down size!!

Cuppasoupmonster · 12/01/2023 17:02

AllThingsServeTheBeam · 12/01/2023 17:00

People forcefully removed from their homes against their will and made to live miles away from where they were ... Hmmm good job you're not in charge innit.

Like private renters have to do all the time? If I stop paying my mortgage should the bank be stopped from repossessing me because it’s ‘against my will’?

Mynewhome · 12/01/2023 17:04

OuchOuchOuchh · 12/01/2023 10:16

Because the way I see it is, it’s not your home unless you’re planning on buying it eventually. You’ve had your turn to bring your family up in a lovely home. Let someone else have the chance instead of living in a big home all on your own. You are only renting after all!

I have recently been housed into a 5 bed council house. I really hope to think once I don't need a big house I will down size. As I get older it most likely would not be practical either. But i also understand its not that easy to swap or move via the council. From my understanding council don't put their self out to help people who want to down size.

midgetastic · 12/01/2023 17:04

Just because the situation for private renters is bad doesn't mean we should make social housing just as bad

We should fix the problems

Eyerollcentral · 12/01/2023 17:05

winterpastasalad · 12/01/2023 16:37

My elderly neighbours lived alone (husband and wife) in their 4 bed council house that they'd lived in for 3 decades. Their daughter and grandson were living there on paper so that they could 'inherit' it after their death.
I also know a couple who are doctors who have a council flat in Maida Vale. They got it in the 90s when she had a baby during medical school. They own two BTL properties that they rent out and their dd lives with them in the flat on paper (she's at uni in Italy) so that one day she will inherit it. The right thing would be to give them up but the cheap rent must make that very difficult!

You can’t ‘inherit’ a council property. One other person can be named as a successor on the lease although increasingly councils are cracking down on that. If the husband dies then the wife can carry it on if the tenancy is in his name only. If it’s in joint names then the daughter MAY be able to continue with the tenancy but I sincerely doubt it. I cannot believe you think because two wealthy people are abusing the system the poorest in society should be punished.

Cuppasoupmonster · 12/01/2023 17:05

midgetastic · 12/01/2023 17:04

Just because the situation for private renters is bad doesn't mean we should make social housing just as bad

We should fix the problems

But it wouldn’t be just as bad if social housing was shuffled about to accommodate need. One of the reason private rentals are so scarce is because we’re being forced to put social tenants up in them in the absence of suitable social housing. Because, y’know, people like OP’s aunt should’ve moved out years ago.

IClaudine · 12/01/2023 17:06

Pinky1011 · 12/01/2023 16:27

YANBI! it makes me SO mad this system is well and truly broken! A council house should provide temporary accommodation until you're able to get back on your feet. Not a lifetime of discounted rent. This country is so backwards I swear. And then you have kids living in cramped hostels and people who work like dogs full-time paying almost half their earnings into system but will never be able to afford a home.

Maybe you should save your ire for the greedy landlords who charge exorbitant rent. Or the people who hoover up buy to lets, when those properties could go to first time buyers. Or the government which has kept the overinflated housing market bubble afloat for so long.

Eyerollcentral · 12/01/2023 17:07

Kabalagala · 12/01/2023 16:39

There are lots of reasons she should move. "She doesn't want to" isn't a good one.

You are right, the better reason is she legally allowed to live there till she dies

Kabalagala · 12/01/2023 17:07

AllThingsServeTheBeam · 12/01/2023 17:00

People forcefully removed from their homes against their will and made to live miles away from where they were ... Hmmm good job you're not in charge innit.

Why are we assuming they would move miles away. I refuse to belive there are many places in the country where there's not an under occupied house and an over crowded house within a mile or 2 of each other.
The people in charge are spineless and totally failed to forward plan, that's why we're in this mess. But hey as long as your nans ok 👍

AllThingsServeTheBeam · 12/01/2023 17:08

Cuppasoupmonster · 12/01/2023 17:02

Like private renters have to do all the time? If I stop paying my mortgage should the bank be stopped from repossessing me because it’s ‘against my will’?

Oh right so because private renters have it bad everyone should? Is that what you're saying. How about.. again... Opening your mouth and getting on to the government to make changes to the private rent market and stop coming after people living in HA homes.. how about that? Nah.. too easy just to whinge about it on MN

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread