ABrotherWhoLooksLikeHellMugYou ·
27/11/2022 07:43
Not sure how much backdoor to give, but last week received furious messages and a blistering call from exH because he wanted to talk to the children on the phone and DS had basically locked himself in the loo with a book.
ExH's premise was that I was 'blocking access to the children'.
He had then EOW as agreed, plus I have said numerous times that if he wants to see them on the in between weekends or during the week to let me know and we can arrange it if we're free.
Our agreements were all done between ourselves, there's no child visitation order or whatever it's called. If the kids want to talk to their dad (and it's not a prevarication method half an hour after lights out) then I hand them my phone and let them call. I often prompt them to call him when somethings happened (class trophy etc).
Sometimes he calls/ messages asking for a call randomly. I don't always see the message because evenings are chaos. When I see the message, providing the kids are awake, not about to go to sleep and not out of the house at an activity, I ask them if they want to talk to dad.
Sometimes they do. Sometimes they don't. They're very much focused in the moment and don't always want to do what they're doing to call their father. I think it's a positive thing because it means they're secure.
In his head I am deliberately blocking access to them and should, I'm not sure, make then call him? He expounded loudly on how he has rights. He didn't specify exactly, but presumably rights to talk to his children whenever he's sad and lonely and it suits him? I dunno. I always believed we had responsibilities, not rights. AIBU?
I'm wondering about seeing up a regular phone call so they call to talk to him at X time once or twice a week and all the ad hoc shit stops. Not sure if that would placate him or infuriate him farther. I suspect someone has been in his ear winding him up about the whole thing. I've not heard him ranting about rights previously. It's not a welcome departure.