For me I think the fact that the harm has been done in the name of Fifa bothers me. And the fact that its looking like its not going to live up to the contract promised.
The stadiums were built for the championship and are unlikely to be used again. Legacy planning needs to be better. All major sporting events face this criticism and governing bodies should be getting better at it. We know that we can hold regional tournaments which is better at this.
And we know that many people died building these white elephant stadiums, on a scale that would not be allowed even in these other places.
For all the ills of the US, Brazil and Mexico its not quite so specific to the tournament itself.
I think there are elements in terms of whether Qatar can deliver the tournament it promised and the fact there were concerns about bribery of officials to get it in the first place. It says something about the game in a way that other destinations wouldnt. There was also the added problem of a November tournament.
The alcohol issue with a uturn just days before the tournament, incomplete facilities that are substandard and then rumours of match fixing is bad for the game itself.
Theres also suggestions about security being paid 35p an hour which could be a recipe for disaster.
Its the whole package. The planning, organisation, the November start date and breaks to the normal season, last minute intervention from the Royal family, the substandard delivery, the lack of future impact consideration, the legacy element, Fifa's bizarre defending of the poor standards, rumours of match fixing AND THEN the human rights issues.
Its a collective shit show.