Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think I've done nothing wrong by making money on a charity

433 replies

Thealarmhasgoneoffagain · 18/10/2022 16:11

I bought a dress for £60 in a charity shop. I didn't think many people would recognise the brand as it's locally made but it would have cost about £300 I think and would probably be a ooak. I'm asuming the charity shop knew this though because of the high price.

I bought the dress for me but it doesn't fit. I didn't want to get a refund from a charity shop but at that price I can't redonate it either. So I put it on my local FB page askimg for offers. I said it was from the charity shop but I didn't put how much I paid. If anyone asked I would have told them.

Someone offered me £100 and I accepted. They collected it and messaged me afterwards to say how happy they were.

Before I could remove the post someone commented that they worked in the shop and it cost £50. Now I'm getting lots of abuse about being greedy and ripping off the charity. The lady who bought it has put angry faces on it. I also have a couple of things on there for free and people have made nasty comments on those. I've removed all my posts now.

I don't feel bad about making money on the dress as that was never my intention. £60 was much, much more than I would normally spend in a charity shop and tbh I don't want to donate the £40. It was a proper charity shop, not one run by little old ladies who price everything at 50p because they don't know any better.

The lady who bought it, offered £100 and never asked how much I paid and was happy until she found out I paid less. I do feel bad that she won't enjoy the dress though as it's a beautiful dress.

AIBU for keeping the £40?

OP posts:
funinthesun19 · 18/10/2022 19:00

Nothing wrong with buying from charity shops and selling for a profit. The charity shop made their money from it and when you bought it, it was yours to do whatever you want with going forward.

Just don’t use local FB pages where an angry charity shop worker might be lurking!

JaffaCake70 · 18/10/2022 19:00

Also, my DH has just commented:

"How many times on Dickinson's Real Deal or Antiques Roadshow do we see people who've bought stuff from charity shops for pennies, then sold them on for £100's, sometimes £1000's?".

You can clear your conscience and forget about it.

P.S. Definitely make a complaint about the charity shop worker.

Hawkins001 · 18/10/2022 19:01

JaffaCake70 · 18/10/2022 19:00

Also, my DH has just commented:

"How many times on Dickinson's Real Deal or Antiques Roadshow do we see people who've bought stuff from charity shops for pennies, then sold them on for £100's, sometimes £1000's?".

You can clear your conscience and forget about it.

P.S. Definitely make a complaint about the charity shop worker.

Perfect example

Suzi888 · 18/10/2022 19:01

vivainsomnia · 18/10/2022 16:23

Sorry I don't believe a minute that you bought it fir yourself. If it was a lot more money than you've ever spend in a charity shop, you would have tried it on.

I think you knew very well that you could make a profit and that's why you did mention the price.

Is this bad, I don't know, but pretending you had no intention of making a profit is hypocritical.

What difference does it make?

Charity shops check brands in any case and price accordingly and if they didn’t ahhh well. They made £60, OP made a profit. 🤷🏼‍♀️

ParentallyUnprepared · 18/10/2022 19:01

Don't people make a living out of doing this?

StarDolphins · 18/10/2022 19:02

touve Not done anything wrong, you paid the price the charity shop wantedthen the person paying £100 paid what they wanted to pay, you made an extra bit, all happy!

BretonBlue · 18/10/2022 19:05

Mapleapple · 18/10/2022 18:56

Why are people suggesting a refund would be better. A refund would mean the charity got £0, until they sold it again. Even if they managed to sell it quickly for the same price is would still mean they’d only get £60. The charity hasn’t lost anything by the OP doing this.

Did you read my second paragraph? OP knew its value and its desirability, as demonstrated by the fact that it was snapped up for £100 when she asked for offers on Facebook. She could have shared this knowledge with the charity shop if she had so wished.

Anon778833 · 18/10/2022 19:05

AnApparitionQuipped · 18/10/2022 16:16

The charity should have priced it at £100 if they wanted £100 for it. If it was £60 to start with they clearly recognised it was a designer label of some kind, because £60 is not on the charity shop scale for non-branded garments.

I agree with the above.

Moonshine5 · 18/10/2022 19:05

To me it comes down to ethics; personally I find these actions morally abhorrent. I know when I donate it's with the hope that someone could have something nicer that may usually be beyond their means (price wise), not so someone else gets to make a quick buck.

Kennykenkencat · 18/10/2022 19:06

Seymour5 · 18/10/2022 18:50

Did you mention it to one of the staff? I don’t think I’ve seen any Primark tee shirts on sale in our shop. Our manager is pretty clued up on clothing prices, perhaps the expertise was lacking in that shop.

I did at the time and they were quite rude and said if I thought I could get the same elsewhere then I should shop there instead.

So I did

When I got to know a few people we got talking about charity shops and my experience and was told the woman in charge of the shop thought that as we lived in what people thought of as an upmarket area then everything donated was designer.

Atmosphere apparently was a designer brand🤣🤣🤣

cheekaa · 18/10/2022 19:06

You have done no wrong. You are fully entitled to keep your £40 profit and enjoy it.

I know of someone who volunteers for a charity shop and regularly buys items from their shops at full price and resells them online for a profit.

Hawkins001 · 18/10/2022 19:08

Moonshine5 · 18/10/2022 19:05

To me it comes down to ethics; personally I find these actions morally abhorrent. I know when I donate it's with the hope that someone could have something nicer that may usually be beyond their means (price wise), not so someone else gets to make a quick buck.

That perspective I also can understand

XenoBitch · 18/10/2022 19:11

Moonshine5 · 18/10/2022 19:05

To me it comes down to ethics; personally I find these actions morally abhorrent. I know when I donate it's with the hope that someone could have something nicer that may usually be beyond their means (price wise), not so someone else gets to make a quick buck.

And when other people donate it is because they can't be arsed to sort through it all, or they can't be bothered to go to the tip.
Ask any charity shop volunteer about what gets donated.. a lot of it is crap... some of it disgusting (think dirty underwear).

Hawkins001 · 18/10/2022 19:12

XenoBitch · 18/10/2022 19:11

And when other people donate it is because they can't be arsed to sort through it all, or they can't be bothered to go to the tip.
Ask any charity shop volunteer about what gets donated.. a lot of it is crap... some of it disgusting (think dirty underwear).

And I can also vouch for that perspectives too, as much as donation are appreciated, from a friends experience, they do get a mixed lot of items, so to speak.

ReneBumsWombats · 18/10/2022 19:13

BretonBlue · 18/10/2022 19:05

Did you read my second paragraph? OP knew its value and its desirability, as demonstrated by the fact that it was snapped up for £100 when she asked for offers on Facebook. She could have shared this knowledge with the charity shop if she had so wished.

The shop knows, for crying out loud, as evidenced by the fact it was priced at £60, which is high for a charity shop. The point is, it's got to price things based on what it's realistically going to get from people who walk into the shop looking for inexpensive goods.

You don't go into charity shops looking to spend £100 on one item. They're known for cheap spends. And they don't have the resources to hold an online auction to reach a wider audience. They price it at what they think they will get from local footfall. They don't have warehouses full of identical goods, they have lots of one offs and the best way they can make a profit is to shift it fast so they can keep restocking with new goods.

You're failing to understand that a) goods don't fetch the same price on all platforms and in all places and b) the business model isn't based on squeezing every last penny out, but on keeping stock moving fast.

She's done nothing wrong.

Mapleapple · 18/10/2022 19:13

BretonBlue · 18/10/2022 19:05

Did you read my second paragraph? OP knew its value and its desirability, as demonstrated by the fact that it was snapped up for £100 when she asked for offers on Facebook. She could have shared this knowledge with the charity shop if she had so wished.

Yes I did. It’s not the OP’s job to do the charity shop’s job for them. With a big charity like BHF, whilst the shop assistants may be volunteers, the shop manager will most certainly be paid. It is their job to ensure they get the most money for their charity.

Also OP had no idea she’d get £100 until the woman offered. Was she then meant to say oh sorry no but if you go to the BHF shop in town I’ll tell them you are willing to pay £100 for it?

Cordeliathecat · 18/10/2022 19:13

I go to invitation only designer sample sales regularly. There are signs everywhere saying “strictly not for resale”. If the charity shop doesn’t want anyone to resell, they would say so.
As PP said, resellers keep the stock ticking over. You’ve done nothing wrong.

FamilyTreeBuilder · 18/10/2022 19:14

caroleanboneparte · 18/10/2022 17:52

YABU

It is people like you who push up prices in charity shops for everyone else.

Imo they should have a joint purpose of raising money for their own cause and secondly to provide reduced cost items for local people who can't afford to shop in 'real' shops.

I've bought lots from charity shops I could resell for more but I couldn't live with myself if I did that.

It's so unethical.

Bingo bongo, you are wrongo.

The ONLY aim of a charity is to raise money for their cause, whether that be cats' protection, cancer research, air ambulance, overseas development, etc.

What you "believe" to be their purpose is neither here nor there.

DaenerysTarragon · 18/10/2022 19:14

BretonBlue · 18/10/2022 19:05

Did you read my second paragraph? OP knew its value and its desirability, as demonstrated by the fact that it was snapped up for £100 when she asked for offers on Facebook. She could have shared this knowledge with the charity shop if she had so wished.

And - based on my experience shared earlier on this thread - they wouldn't have been interested. They would rather put items up at prices that will sell reasonably easily and quickly than mark them up at a higher and less attractive price.

Mapleapple · 18/10/2022 19:14

Many charities also sell higher priced items through eBay, the charity shop also had that option.

Hawkins001 · 18/10/2022 19:16

Mapleapple · 18/10/2022 19:14

Many charities also sell higher priced items through eBay, the charity shop also had that option.

I know, bhf has their own, dedicated eBay

BretonBlue · 18/10/2022 19:17

ReneBumsWombats · 18/10/2022 19:13

The shop knows, for crying out loud, as evidenced by the fact it was priced at £60, which is high for a charity shop. The point is, it's got to price things based on what it's realistically going to get from people who walk into the shop looking for inexpensive goods.

You don't go into charity shops looking to spend £100 on one item. They're known for cheap spends. And they don't have the resources to hold an online auction to reach a wider audience. They price it at what they think they will get from local footfall. They don't have warehouses full of identical goods, they have lots of one offs and the best way they can make a profit is to shift it fast so they can keep restocking with new goods.

You're failing to understand that a) goods don't fetch the same price on all platforms and in all places and b) the business model isn't based on squeezing every last penny out, but on keeping stock moving fast.

She's done nothing wrong.

I literally said she has done nothing wrong.

TheLassWiADelicateAir · 18/10/2022 19:18

FarmGirl78 · 18/10/2022 17:46

You didn't want to get a refund because you knew you could sell it on at a higher price. Am I correct? I don't see why you couldn't have taken it back.

Refund from a charity shop? Seriously- you are joking aren't you?

Mapleapple · 18/10/2022 19:19

@Thealarmhasgoneoffagain did you gift aid your donation? Because if so the charity got £75 from the dress so even less of a gap.

ReneBumsWombats · 18/10/2022 19:20

They'll sell online if they have the resources to make that a profitable use of their time.

Frequently it isn't, because online selling is a bloody hassle. That's why so many of us would rather dump a huge bag of wearable clothes at the charity shop than photograph them, list them, watch them, pay the site fees, pack them up and post them.

They're pricing to their market. They are aware it's a smaller market than online and they don't care, that's how markets work. They just want the stuff gone, quickly, at asking price.