My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

Who is BU - restaurant choices.

165 replies

BeeRogue · 29/09/2022 12:02

I'm going to do that tedious A and B thing, sorry!

Person A has just had a baby and is dieting, she also has a dairy allergy. Person B asked Person A (and her children) to go out for lunch, and Person A agreed. Person B is having some financial difficulties. There was no discussion about which restaurant to go to.

Person B booked a restaurant where main meals cost £10-£15 and told Person A she's booked it. Person A doesn't like this option because all the options she can eat are over 1000 calories and aren't the type of food she likes. It's the opposite side of town from Person A's house and would require two buses to get to. Person B has suggested picking Person A up and that she could have a one-off treat.

Person A suggested a restaurant in town where main meals cost £12-£16. Person B doesn't like this because it's more expensive and there's no free parking. Person A has offered to pay for Person B and has said that Person B can park at her house (obviously for free).

Person B doesn't want to be paid for by Person A and thinks Person A is being unreasonable. Person A doesn't want to eat extra calories (especially for a meal that she won't enjoy) and thinks Person B is being unreasonable.

YABU - Go to the cheaper, higher calorie place.
YANBU - Go to the more expensive, healthier place.

OP posts:
Report

Am I being unreasonable?

557 votes. Final results.

POLL
You are being unreasonable
48%
You are NOT being unreasonable
52%
WaltzingWaters · 29/09/2022 12:36

Wow that’s a lot of drama. Sounds as if the healthier restaurant is barely any more expensive anyway, so I’d go for that one. Or just go to a supermarket and make something much cheaper and healthier you both like!

Report
Glitteratitar · 29/09/2022 12:37

Seriously? I think you need to both find a better hobby.

Report
nobodygirle · 29/09/2022 12:38

Is £12-16 really that much more expensive than £10-12 for a lunch? I think person A wins it.

Person A has good reason - dieting, doesn't like the food at original suggestion and has offered both free parking and to pay for lunch. Person B is just being difficult over the sake of potentially 2 quid.

Report
mrsm43s · 29/09/2022 12:39

I think A's being difficult, actually.

She could eat something a bit more calorific than normal - she doesn't want to
She could eat a half portion - she doesn't want to
She could just have a starter - she doesn't want to
There's lots of ways that A could compromise, but she's not prepared to. (and no doubt the restaurant - any restaurant will serve something simple like a salad or soup or a sandwich which would be low enough in calories)

A isn't going to be happy unless she gets her choice - it's obvious that B prefers the cheaper restaurant, and she has made the arrangements and booked it. In future, A should make the arrangements and book the restaurant if she wants to go to a specific place.

Report
ChippyTea16 · 29/09/2022 12:39

So neither of you want to go to the other's choice? There are only 2 solutions then, don't bother or find a 3rd option you are both happy with!

As an aside, it's not going to be fun for B going out for lunch with a diet bore so I really just wouldn't bother!

Report
Crunchymum · 29/09/2022 12:39

I'm confused. Are there 3 of you going?

Report
Iknowthis1 · 29/09/2022 12:41

A and B are both mad as a March hare.

Report
erinaceus · 29/09/2022 12:41

Have lunch together over zoom? You can both eat from home, eat what you like, save on the cost of parking, and there's easy access to MN to settle any disputes you are having.

Report
BeeRogue · 29/09/2022 12:42

I think A' B's being difficult, actually.

She could eat something a bit more calorific expensive than normal - she doesn't want to
She could eat a half portion side - she doesn't want to
She could just have a starter - she doesn't want to
There's lots of ways that A could compromise, but she's not prepared to.

OP posts:
Report
BeeRogue · 29/09/2022 12:42

Iknowthis1 · 29/09/2022 12:41

A and B are both mad as a March hare.

Correct

OP posts:
Report
BryceQuinlanTheFirst · 29/09/2022 12:43

What kind of restaurant is it that everything is hugely calorific? I mean even fast food places do a slimmer version. And just eat less the rest of the day.

And the price difference you indicated was £2 difference.

Both seem very fixed and it sounds like a huge hasslez

Report
PaperPalace · 29/09/2022 12:44

Maybe toss a coin this time and then agree to go to the other place next time?

Report
Jalepenojello · 29/09/2022 12:44

Person A did the inviting so I’d either decline or go along with it. I wouldn’t say yes to lunch out if I was going to be picky over calories for 1 meal.

Report
TooGosh · 29/09/2022 12:45

Seeing as it's 12.44 and you're both there reading Mumsnet to decide can I suggest eating at whichever person's house you're at - then you get cheap, low calorie food plus the entertainment of following Mumsnet! Win win.

Report
littlepeas · 29/09/2022 12:45

Bloody hell. Both unreasonable and annoying and fussy.

Report
tharsheblows · 29/09/2022 12:45

BeeRogue · 29/09/2022 12:28

By the way, A and B are both here and reviewing - we're not falling out over this, it's not that deep, we just need help deciding where to go.

A would like to add that she doesn't want to spend money and calories on eating half a portion of food she doesn't like, has used up all her calories and is still hungry.

B, equally, doesn't want to just order a starter because she'll also be left hungry.

(B would like to add that A is thinner than her and doesn't need to diet and A would like to add that B has more money than her)

I love this! I think it's a fine way to be and you clearly like each other at least a little bit 😊

Here's what I'd do: go with Person A's suggestion with the understanding that Person B gets to say ONCE "but last time we did what you wanted" and that Person A might say "this is not at all the same thing" in which case, Person B can narrow their eyes and think "I never should have agreed to that".

But seriously, I'd go with Person A's suggestion and maybe let Person B pay them back a bit one way or another if that helps Person B agree to the plan!

Report
mrsm43s · 29/09/2022 12:46

BeeRogue · 29/09/2022 12:42

I think A' B's being difficult, actually.

She could eat something a bit more calorific expensive than normal - she doesn't want to
She could eat a half portion side - she doesn't want to
She could just have a starter - she doesn't want to
There's lots of ways that A could compromise, but she's not prepared to.

But B made the invite, B booked the restaurant, B invited A to join her at her chosen restaurant. She didn't ask A to pick a restaurant. If A had made the invite/arrangements and booked the restaurant, then yes, it would be on B to decline or compromise. But A didn't, she accepted the invitation and now wants to change the venue.

If A wants to go to her favourite restaurant, then its up to A to put in the leg work, make the invite, sort the arrangements and book the table.

B is in the right, A is inflexible and in the wrong.

Next time A can make the arrangements, and they can go to a restaurant of her choice.

Report
CountingCrowns · 29/09/2022 12:47

BeeRogue · 29/09/2022 12:34

Are you not embarrassed?

I'm using this site, with a friend, to gauge opinion on a trivial, light-hearted dispute. You're using it, alone, to hurl petty abuse at strangers. Of the two of us, I think I know who I'd rather be.

“hurl abuse” 🤣 ok

Report
PuppyMonkey · 29/09/2022 12:47

Person B has done the inviting out, which is a nice thing to do. Insisting they go somewhere Person A doesn’t like is not such a nice thing to do.

If Person B doesn’t like the alternative suggested by Person A, they are at liberty to decline. And maybe just accept the lunch idea can’t happen.

If Person B is really so skint a difference of £5-6 creates such huge problems in their life, maybe they shouldn’t have suggested going out to lunch in the first place. Wink

Report
PaperPalace · 29/09/2022 12:48

I'm now over invested in this! Please let us know what you decide OP!

Report
drpet49 · 29/09/2022 12:48

nobodygirle · 29/09/2022 12:38

Is £12-16 really that much more expensive than £10-12 for a lunch? I think person A wins it.

Person A has good reason - dieting, doesn't like the food at original suggestion and has offered both free parking and to pay for lunch. Person B is just being difficult over the sake of potentially 2 quid.

I completely agree with this.

Report
Asperia · 29/09/2022 12:48

Is B trying to sabotage A's diet?

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

DailyEnergyCrisis · 29/09/2022 12:49

Will either of you actually enjoy it given how petty/tedious it’s been even deciding where to go? I’d definitely just sack it off and get on with your day.

Report
PrincessConsuelaBanana · 29/09/2022 12:49

BeeRogue · 29/09/2022 12:34

Are you not embarrassed?

I'm using this site, with a friend, to gauge opinion on a trivial, light-hearted dispute. You're using it, alone, to hurl petty abuse at strangers. Of the two of us, I think I know who I'd rather be.

Well said OP 😂

I think person B is most unreasonable considering the more expensive place is only approx £2 more for a main. Park at A’s house so parking is still free and pay the extra £2 for your main. A could pay the difference to make up for not having to pay for transport to the other place…?

Report
properdoughnut · 29/09/2022 12:50

forrestgreen · 29/09/2022 12:03

Just don't bother, sounds like way too much hard work. It should be fun, see a friend and having a meal.

Yeah go for coffee instead

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.