Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to believe rich people should contribute much more?

696 replies

marcusian · 27/09/2022 13:16

A bit tongue in cheek, but given that its almost impossible for poorly paid workers including care workers and nurses to strike, and that the government have given people earning over £100K a massive pay rise, what other ways could the most wealthy be made to pay?

My idea: - a new LUXURIES tax (think 50% VAT) on things ordinary people cant buy, like superyachts, airplanes, £10K+ dining tables, a box at wimbledon, £500+ handbags, £100+ football boots!

AIBU - No - they should pay more and heres my ideas how they should do it!
AIBU - Yes - leave wealthy people alone, its not their fault

AIBU to believe rich people should contribute much more?
OP posts:
Crikeyalmighty · 28/09/2022 15:20

Personally I'm more for the Scandi system . Much higher tax across the board, no NI, fully subsidised childcare for all ages, no council tax, better pensions, better health options..

ExpectMore · 28/09/2022 15:21

Topgub · 28/09/2022 15:19

@ExpectMore

There are a finite number of high paying jobs.

How can everyone get one if they want 1?

@Topgub

I'm not going to respond to any more of your questions as your either don't listen or don't understand or both; in any event, it's a waste of my time.

Have a good day 👍

MrAutumnal · 28/09/2022 15:22

🤣🤣 here we go again... can't have a reasonable debate so end up at mockery

Exactly and the ‘best’ bit is calling someone posh for saying tripe. Only on MN.

beanybyebo · 28/09/2022 15:29

How much tax do you think higher earners should pay on say £100k salary.
People who are wealthy is not on any thing like £100k just move to a better places when the taxes are too high.

Topgub · 28/09/2022 15:31

@ExpectMore

Youve said good day about 5 x already.

I'm learning its code for dont have an answer.

Good day sir.

🤣

ExpectMore · 28/09/2022 15:32

MrAutumnal · 28/09/2022 15:22

🤣🤣 here we go again... can't have a reasonable debate so end up at mockery

Exactly and the ‘best’ bit is calling someone posh for saying tripe. Only on MN.

Yip. It's crazy. It's like being back in the playground

Coucous · 28/09/2022 15:33

beanybyebo · 28/09/2022 15:29

How much tax do you think higher earners should pay on say £100k salary.
People who are wealthy is not on any thing like £100k just move to a better places when the taxes are too high.

People on these salaries are qualified so can get jobs elsewhere and leave for a better quality of life. If you make it uncomfortable they will leave. They pay the largest share of taxes - then what will the UK do when they have left?
The top 1% are salaries around 130-160 K plus. It's not only millionaires - you will run them out of the country.

We need to take why salaries are so low in the UK and why 400K people are on job seekers allowance when there are so many jobs so much that we are giving foreigners visas for care work jobs etc.

Topgub · 28/09/2022 15:34

Omg.

Absolutely dying at the accusations of mockery and attempting to the take the higher ground given I've has all sorts slung at me

🤣

Topgub · 28/09/2022 15:36

@Coucous

Salaries are so low in the uk because the most wealthy want to keep the wealth for themselves

🤷‍♀️

Of course no one wants anyone to be in poverty. They just don't actually want to have to do anything about it themselves either.

MrAutumnal · 28/09/2022 15:40

@Topgub

That wasn’t at you, unless you also think tripe is posh. I could understand it if someone had said ‘sweetbreads’ but tripe? Can’t stomach that sort of nonsense.

Biker47 · 28/09/2022 15:44

roarfeckingroarr · 27/09/2022 13:45

Rich people already pay more.

They haven't been "given a pay rise" by the government; they have been allowed to keep more of their earned income than previously.

Same as everybody who's earning less than £50k, with the reduction in basic rate tax to 19% and the reversal of the NI increase, which people seem to be conveniently forgetting.

Lauren1983 · 28/09/2022 15:53

Some of the stereotypes about the rich (specifically the user rich) are true though. Would Boris Johnson have been PM if he hadn't gone to Eton and had been born on a council estate? I worked for a large retailer whose CEO retired. He was replaced with his nephew. Was his nephew really the best person in the whole country for the job?

I have lost count of hearing stories of people who boast about running their own business and then it turns out they inherited the business.

Wealth creates wealth.

Lauren1983 · 28/09/2022 15:54

*uber rich not user

Lassie76 · 28/09/2022 15:55

"They just don't actually want to have to do anything about it themselves either."

Apart from paying half of their salaries in tax, what MORE do you want them to do?

Biker47 · 28/09/2022 15:58

PearlLennox · 27/09/2022 14:26

What about taxing lottery wins over a certain amount?

i mean if you win like £75 million on the lottery…how come no one ever complains about the lack of tax on that?

Because the winnings are tax free, tax is paid on the ticket when you buy it.

ExpectMore · 28/09/2022 16:10

@Biker47

Because the winnings are tax free, tax is paid on the ticket when you buy it.

The same could be said for:
-house purchases
-share purchases
-etc

ie they're paid for with money that's already been taxed yet... any resultant gains are still taxed!

samyeagar · 28/09/2022 16:17

hamsterchump · 27/09/2022 20:45

Wow imagine actually typing this and outing yourself as totally and utterly self obsessed and devoid of empathy like this? Amazing 😂

This is why there is a global shift to the right in western nations. It has gotten to the point where the basis for traditional shaming tactics have become so broad as to no longer have any real meaning. Attempting to shame people for otherwise reasonable positions is having the opposite affect.

Biker47 · 28/09/2022 16:32

midgetastic · 27/09/2022 17:20

A person in the lowest wages will be a few pounds better off as a result of the tax changes - much less than the impact of inflation on a minimal standard of living

Those at the top will be a few thousand pounds a year better off - more that covering the inflation on any essential costs as required for a basic standard of living

That's why I agree the budget favors the rich

Shock horror, people who are the lowest paid, don't see an improvement after a tax cut... because they barely pay any of that tax to begin with. That's always going to be the case, it's such a lazy argument.

NannyOggsWhiskyStash · 28/09/2022 16:33

If rich people stopped using tax avoidance schemes, we would all be better off. I very much include large companies in this.

Lassie76 · 28/09/2022 16:41

Biker47 · 28/09/2022 16:32

Shock horror, people who are the lowest paid, don't see an improvement after a tax cut... because they barely pay any of that tax to begin with. That's always going to be the case, it's such a lazy argument.

Exactly.
If a restaurant chain offered 10% off the bill, a family who spends £500 is going to get £50 off their meal, whilst someone who spends £30 is only going to get £3.
Should they start complaining that Family A got a bigger discount?

Q2C4 · 28/09/2022 16:46

Flyingwithoutwing · 27/09/2022 14:12

I would also say that I have worked in HR in investment banks and EVERYONE pays PAYE, even the directors. On salaries and bonuses. The amount of people that think all bankers dodge tax. It’s just not true!

And when a banker gets a bonus, 40% of it is immediately handed over to HMRC via PAYE...

Q2C4 · 28/09/2022 16:49

PearlLennox · 27/09/2022 14:26

What about taxing lottery wins over a certain amount?

i mean if you win like £75 million on the lottery…how come no one ever complains about the lack of tax on that?

Because if HMRC were to tax gambling winnings, they'd also have to allow deductions for gambling losses, which would cost them a fortune!

Q2C4 · 28/09/2022 16:56

NannyOggsWhiskyStash · 28/09/2022 16:33

If rich people stopped using tax avoidance schemes, we would all be better off. I very much include large companies in this.

It's not large companies that are the problem as they generally have large internal tax teams or advisors to make sure they are paying the right amount of tax. The biggest slice of the tax gap is in the small companies / sole traders area. Either they make compliance mistakes (as the UK tax system is so horrendously complicated & they can't afford specialists to sort it out for them) or they are small enough not to worry about the reputational damage that comes with using a tax avoidance scheme.

usernamealreadytaken · 28/09/2022 17:22

Interesting discussion. Several PP have said they'd be happy to pay more tax - good news; you already can! None of this waiting for the government to make you do so; just follow the link and job's a good 'un 😊
advisingfamilies.org/uk/information-portal/managing-money/can-i-pay-more-tax-voluntarily/

Biker47 · 28/09/2022 17:31

Nidan2Sandan · 28/09/2022 14:50

I'd rather the rate at which you start to pay 40% was increased from £50k to £85k and then close all the tax loopholes businesses take advantage of instead.

Maybe reduce Lords and MP salaries down to a high earner but not HIGH earner rate, say £55k and remove all their freebies and deductibles not to mention the cheap lunches.

I honestly think until MPs, including the PM, have to live on the same kind of income as their citizens, they will never understand what is actually best for the country and its citizens.

Can agree with the increasing the threshold for 40% tax, it has stagnated for too long. But MP salaries... are you really wanting the only people who would actually want to be MP's or could afford to be MP's are the independently wealthy who just want power? I'm not even a Labour voter but you can see it had benefit for the country when they started actually paying MP's in the early 1900's. I earn close to what an MP's salary is, I wouldn't touch that job with a 20 ft barge pole for what the salary is now, let alone even less, far too much work and public intrusion for that salary.