Mumsnet Logo
My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

To say that when applying for jobs some people should just make more effort?

286 replies

cocktailclub · 22/09/2022 05:52

I hear all the time that people have applied for 'hundreds' of jobs and not even had an interview. I hear this from graduates as well as more mature candidates.
I've been recruiting to my team over the last year and advertised about 7 or 8 roles. They BFF e been fairly popular and I have sifted around 120 cvs per role in the first two weeks.
My point is that only about 10% of applicants ensure their cv is tailored to the role.
I spend about 3 minutes looking at each applicant so need to be impressed quickly.
Most CVs start with a statement looking for a career in science' when the role is complaints manager for example.
By making a few changes to a CV so it highlights the skills for the role you want would be easy to do but very few even try.
So I'm not surprised people have no luck in their job search when they can't be bothered with the application.
AIBU to think this is the reason they are rejected?

OP posts:
Report

35965a · 22/09/2022 07:09

I think employers expect far too much from applicants most of the time. You spend 3 minutes looking at a CV when it takes hours to fill in application forms on each online portal. For shit jobs too. No wonder some may accidentally send the wrong CV, they’ve probably got about 15 tailored versions saved.

Report

35965a · 22/09/2022 07:09

WhatNoRaisins · 22/09/2022 07:06

The whole thing needs a massive overhaul.

No more making people apply for anything and everything to please the jobcentre

No more of these generic and meaningless job adverts that you couldn't tailor an application to even if you wanted to

Proportionate job application processes for the role and salary

Job adverts that actually contain relevant information like where the job actually is and what the actual hours will be

There's so much time and effort wasted on this completely unnecessarily

Very true ^

Report

00100001 · 22/09/2022 07:12

BoredWithLife · 22/09/2022 06:18

"I spend about 3 minutes looking at each applicant so need to be impressed quickly."

Just curious, if you are only willing to give there application 3 minutes, how long are they supposed to give creating it? I get that it is often seen that the employee is "giving" someone a job/chance but the same is true in reverse the applicant is "giving" the company their skills.

Why do you expect serious effort on the applicants part if you're only willing to offer 3 minutes?

If you have 100 applicants, you can't spend 45 minutes carefully considering each application.


It's really a quick task to bsirt into initial rejected/look into further piles. 3 minutes is generous.



Last hire we did, we had people who only answered questions with 1-2 words. Rejected. Didn't include CV as requested? Rejected.

Skimmed over answered questions, look promising? Put them in maybe pile. Poor grammar/spelling etc... Rejected.
Skimmed over CV, relevant experience? Maybe. No experience? Rejected.


We sorted through the applications quickly.


Maybe pile gets looked at more closely.

Report

GhostFromTheOtherSide · 22/09/2022 07:18

It goes both ways though. Applying for multiple jobs, which is what is required when you’re unemployed is a full time job in itself and is utterly soul destroying when the employer doesn’t even bother to acknowledge that you weren’t successful.

I agree that you have to put at least some effort into applying for a job but let’s be honest here, when you’re spending 35 hours plus a week applying for jobs not all of them are going to be your dream job.

And from the applicant’s perspective, the number of spelling and grammatical mistakes I’ve seen in job adverts is shocking. I mean truly shocking. And actually embarrassing when one of the criteria sought is “attention to detail.” If you want the applicants to put in the effort then so should the employer.

And there is 0 excuse for not sending a rejection. None what so ever, given that most jobs are applied through via online portal and they have the ability to build in a generic email when they reject that application.

Report

Breastfeedingworries · 22/09/2022 07:21

When looking for local roles I’ve used Zoop recruitment.

found them helpful to be honest. They look through the CVS, match skills qualifications then they do a phone interview with the candidates before they refer.

saves on the boring cv scrolls of mememe III, or charity plugs. Hard work is done, it’s a bit soulless eventually looking through so many cvs.

Report

Hearthnhome · 22/09/2022 07:25

00100001 · 22/09/2022 07:12

If you have 100 applicants, you can't spend 45 minutes carefully considering each application.


It's really a quick task to bsirt into initial rejected/look into further piles. 3 minutes is generous.



Last hire we did, we had people who only answered questions with 1-2 words. Rejected. Didn't include CV as requested? Rejected.

Skimmed over answered questions, look promising? Put them in maybe pile. Poor grammar/spelling etc... Rejected.
Skimmed over CV, relevant experience? Maybe. No experience? Rejected.


We sorted through the applications quickly.


Maybe pile gets looked at more closely.

But when people are applying for jobs employers are expecting people to spend 45 mins tailoring their CVS for each other the hundreds of jobs they are applying for.

As someone who regularly recruits for all areas of their company, it’s beyond me how you can’t scan the jobs and description of the role and responsibilities and figure out yes or no. That can be done quickly

Rather than expecting someone to write a a summary just for that job. What’s the point of the CV if all you want is a personalised summary or cover letter, specifically for your company and role.

and it sounds like you fill in an application AND want a tailored CV? You are expecting people to put in a lot of time, that you are willing to give them.

Report

Meseekslookatme · 22/09/2022 07:30

Did you acknowledge every applicant?
If not YABU.
I'm not spending a couple of hours on each application for it to get glanced at for 3 minutes and binned. That's incredibly disrespectful.
I made job hunting a full time job when I got made redundant and can count on 2 hands how many nice rejections I got.
FULL TIME searching, hours every day, and most of the employers couldn't even be bothered to send me a generic email back.
I found a job within a week of finishing my old one because my cv is good.
If my cv is good and I can't even get a rejection, how must others feel?
I now don't actively hunt if I want a new job. I switch on LinkedIn and cv library and let them come to me. And they do, because no-one seems to be able to fill positions with the crap wages they used to get away with. Bliss.

Report

CoalTit · 22/09/2022 07:32

It's called a curriculum vitae because it's supposed to give you a brief resumé of a person's career until now. Curriculum: course, road, journey. Vitae: life. The idea of tailoring it for each potential employee is absurd in itself.

Report

bagboo · 22/09/2022 07:37

We've had similar recently. And we only require a cover letter and CV, not pages of online form filling.

50 applications, we're only interviewing 4. The rest were full of spelling mistakes, asking 10k over the salary offer, some cover letters talking about completely different roles, some CVs with zero relevant experience.

We're advertising for an administrator at 24k. We've had applications from previous bricklayers and beauticians who don't refer to any use of relevant systems, one says they're not good with computers, one waffles on about their interest in medieval weaponry.

Report

PianoHouseBanger · 22/09/2022 07:39

Agree with so many points made by PP.

When companies start being transparent, i.e putting actual salaries or bandings instead of 'competitive', working schedule etc, then I think people Will make more effort.

The amount of times I've spent hours tailoring, going through applications and interviews, to learn the salary advised after the 2nd interview, was far too low. A complete waste of time for everyone.

Oh, and wanting every applicant to have a degree, even if it has no bearing on the job advertised at all. What happened to experience.

Report

NeverDropYourMooncup · 22/09/2022 07:40

cocktailclub · 22/09/2022 06:42

Firstly, sorry about my posting errors. I'm using my phone and I have fat fingers.
I totally understand that putting in a detailed application takes time and can be soul destroying when you get no response.
We don't ask for a covering letter or any specific questions (although I do cover motivation to apply for the role and skills and experience in a telephone screening call if they get passed the first sift).
My issue is that the CV starts with a statement like "looking for my next role in a scientific laboratory" for example when we are a charity for social care.why bother applying? You e ruled yourself out and wasted the time it took you to upload the cv.
And our job descriptions are fairly specific.

Why be so specific? It's a charity for social care - you either need support staff or admin. It doesn't matter if a lab tech applies, they've got a good chance of being able to do either without wasting time trying to rephrase 'I can make sure nobody catches some awful disease in the lab from anything I do' into 'has experience of being responsible for own health and safety' (as is clumsily stated in many job specs).

Report

ColinRobinsonsfamiliar · 22/09/2022 07:41

yes op!
And then after sifting through them all, inviting people for interview and they turn up in flip flops and jeans or have their phones clutched to their hands… not on mute!!!

Very very frustrating.

Report

sheepdogdelight · 22/09/2022 07:44

I've recently been recruiting for a job that wasn't entry level (salary 35-40K - would expect the person to have at least several years' experience) and likely that most candidates weren't "trying to get the job centre off their back", but already in work and looking for a move.

So many of the applications were poor. We asked for CV and covering letter - many candidates sent one and not the other. Many candidates had either just finished university or had no experience in the field, when it was clear they needed relevant experience. A lot of CVs were so generic it was hard to work out if they had the relevant experience or not. Covering letters tended to say "very excited about this job" but didn't say why they thought they were a good candidate. One memorably said "I am very interested in working for Network Rail". My company is not Network Rail.

We read every word of every CV, but we have minimal time to "read between the lines". You need to spell stuff out.

Report

TiredButDancing · 22/09/2022 07:46

I have a weird sideline in helping people with their cvs - indo it for friends and family. But... actually, I increasingly think the cv is an outdated tool. Or one that should go back to basics (job titles, companies and dates only) because it makes "writing a cv" a key skill for getting a job even if that job is "chief washer upper".

Having said that, i do think that whether it's via cv, LinkedIn, cover letter etc, a LOT of people are really bad at understanding that they are not entitled to a job. I once posted asking for freelancers on LinkedIn and was absolutely horrified at the responses.

It's a minefield.

Report

Textboxmm · 22/09/2022 07:46

‘Might be hard for you but it's even harder for job applicants who are expected to fill out multiple forms and individual cover letters and CVs for each job application - which often turn out to be an inactive/internal post that they have no chance at anyway. Use a recruitment agency if you cba to sift through bad ones’

this. And at least you’re getting paid to do it…

Report

Hearthnhome · 22/09/2022 07:49

ColinRobinsonsfamiliar · 22/09/2022 07:41

yes op!
And then after sifting through them all, inviting people for interview and they turn up in flip flops and jeans or have their phones clutched to their hands… not on mute!!!

Very very frustrating.

Wow phone on their hands! What an outrage!

Couldn’t possibly be that they had it in their hand when they arrived and are just extremely nervous given the situation.

Must mean they are unemployable 🙄

Report

JustDanceAddict · 22/09/2022 07:50

I have a CV that I make tweaks to depending on the role. However I agree with the PP above who says that even for admin roles these days you often have to complete a long-winded application form which takes hours and sometimes not even get an acknowledgment. Years ago it was mainly covering letter and CV which to me is much easier and it’s not hard to tailor your application well.
i have also sifted through and omg the dross that comes through. It is incredibly difficult to recruit as there may be 1 in 100 applications worth interviewing (not even taking into account non-tailored CVs, they just have no relevant experience.

Report

bagboo · 22/09/2022 07:51

PianoHouseBanger · 22/09/2022 07:39

Agree with so many points made by PP.

When companies start being transparent, i.e putting actual salaries or bandings instead of 'competitive', working schedule etc, then I think people Will make more effort.

The amount of times I've spent hours tailoring, going through applications and interviews, to learn the salary advised after the 2nd interview, was far too low. A complete waste of time for everyone.

Oh, and wanting every applicant to have a degree, even if it has no bearing on the job advertised at all. What happened to experience.

We put the salary range and working hours on the ad and still get bonkers applications.

Report

00100001 · 22/09/2022 07:54

Hearthnhome · 22/09/2022 07:25

But when people are applying for jobs employers are expecting people to spend 45 mins tailoring their CVS for each other the hundreds of jobs they are applying for.

As someone who regularly recruits for all areas of their company, it’s beyond me how you can’t scan the jobs and description of the role and responsibilities and figure out yes or no. That can be done quickly

Rather than expecting someone to write a a summary just for that job. What’s the point of the CV if all you want is a personalised summary or cover letter, specifically for your company and role.

and it sounds like you fill in an application AND want a tailored CV? You are expecting people to put in a lot of time, that you are willing to give them.

Sometimes having the CV and the application form together is really helpful.
People aren't always consistent in their job history between the two.

Also, we don't ask paragraph/suitability questions etc. So having their CV is a useful tool to check against their other skills. Like if they can put a basic CV together, or write a short and to the point summary at the top.


CVs have revealed way more than the application form. One memorable applicant sent in a 9 page long CV 😁

Report

Arbesque · 22/09/2022 07:56

00100001 · 22/09/2022 07:12

If you have 100 applicants, you can't spend 45 minutes carefully considering each application.


It's really a quick task to bsirt into initial rejected/look into further piles. 3 minutes is generous.



Last hire we did, we had people who only answered questions with 1-2 words. Rejected. Didn't include CV as requested? Rejected.

Skimmed over answered questions, look promising? Put them in maybe pile. Poor grammar/spelling etc... Rejected.
Skimmed over CV, relevant experience? Maybe. No experience? Rejected.


We sorted through the applications quickly.


Maybe pile gets looked at more closely.

But do you send a quick email to the reject pile letting them know their application has been unsuccessful?

Report

thecatsthecats · 22/09/2022 07:58

Sounds like you're bad at sifting.

I sift as they come in. We include a basic instruction for all applications - CV and cover letter. Which knocks out about 1/3. The ones written in crayon - another 1/3.

The remaining 1/3 aren't all tailored, but frankly I'm not arrogant enough to think that these people all want a job specifically with me.

Good recruitment I've seen at the moment includes your CV, plus giving a few short answers in lieu of a cover letter. I've even had questions given to me before an interview - because smart companies have copped on to the fact they want the best person for the job, not the one with the most time to work on the application.

Report

KatherineJaneway · 22/09/2022 07:58

Recruitment cost a lot of money and time and comes with pitfalls for the company. The reason you have an online portal is because asking for CV's comes with the threat of 'You didn't give me the job because I'm X' I had one chap email and ask if I didn't give him the job because he is Muslim. No matey, you didn't get the job as this was customer service based with a lot of face to face time with staff and customers and on his application he'd said he prefers working alone away from people.

You see a lot of awful applications, people who have no relevant experience, CV's that are not tailored in the slightest. When they get the job some then try and bargain non negotiables.

Report

bob78 · 22/09/2022 07:59

I know job hunting can be a bit arduous, but considering how much of your life a job takes and the lifeline it is in your financial security I don't think spending time on applications is a tall ask. Recruiting is challenging so you need to get it right, a CV in isolation tells you very little (unless actually we'll written which is a rarity) I change jobs every couple years and take quite "strategic" steps in that I'm not applying in bulk to wide ranging roles, I don't understand the mentality of applying to everything with little effort (excepting job centre applicants, they can normally be sifted out with ease) there is a lot of support out there to help people, many of the applications I have seen are pure laziness, especially when graduates, there are no excuses, go to your career shop.

Report

Butterfly44 · 22/09/2022 07:59

I totally agree. I recruit a fair bit and some applications are so poor, they don't seem to read the job description or person spec as there's zero evidence in the application. Straight on no pile. I don't know if kids get taught about cvs and applying for jobs in school at all; it's an important life skill to know about.

Report

jessieminto · 22/09/2022 08:00

I'm recruiting right now and struggling to get applications due to the combo of our location and salary. SMT know this but would rather wait it out.

I get more applications from other countries, people without any relevant experience at all or from people who don't know where the location is and realise they can't get there on public transport. It's very frustrating.

OTH - I'm also looking to move on. I can't be bothered with these long application processes, log in to this portal, upload a CV here etc. if it's a 1 click apply and my CV wooshes off then great. Otherwise, I'm too tired and drained to log in on a PC. I'm doing it off my phone or not at all.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

We're all short on time

Log in or sign up to use the 'See Next' or 'See all' posts by the OP (Original Poster) and cut straight to the action.

Already signed up?

Sign up to continue reading

Mumsnet's better when you're logged in. You can customise your experience and access way more features like messaging, watch and hide threads, voting and much more.

Already signed up?