Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think the NHS will eventually have to be privatised ?

401 replies

Felixsmama · 25/07/2022 10:23

When the NHS was founded 1 in 2 people died before the age of 65. It's now 1 in 8, the last 10 years of people's lives can be spent with multiple co-morbid conditions which are expensive to treat and keep under control. The NHS wasn't designed for what it's not having to do, we have an aging population. Shouldn't we start to have conversations about what going forward our health service should look like? There's multiple models not just the US one.

OP posts:
C8H10N4O2 · 28/07/2022 08:25

AndreaC74 · 27/07/2022 09:44

Look at the antique business systems run in most health organisations with large parts of records still on paper/printed out and a level of manual data entry which is frankly terrifying and explains a lot of the records problems in health. That isn't a problem a cost its decades of "we can't learn anything from outside" and a fiefdom mentality. It does however cost money, patient time and well being

Upgrading a very large non structured cabled building to cat6/7 is extremely expensive & disruptive, then you need all the hardware and s/w to run electronic note keeping plus all the GP surgeries have to all have joint access, then you need all the network security firewalls and staff to run it all.....

Derriford uses paper records (in the main building but electronic in the smaller off site departments) and was built long before ethernet.

Yes I'm very familiar with the costs of this kind of infrastructure project which is why its so bloody frustrating when the fiefdoms refuse to cooperate or work together even on basics which massively hikes up costs.

Each fiefdom doing its own thing, often providing a mish mash of small providers because they looks cheap up front but lack the ability to turnaround a complex piece of work. So a series of cheap bodge jobs happens. I've lost count of the costs I've seen burned by bad decisioning on IT in the NHS, usually because the areas flatly refuse to work together and each insists its too special to share. The degree to which basic data entry is still manual is shocking - and causes errors in records regularly - its not just because hospitals have insufficient cabling (and tbh, cabling, like plumbing and water should be part of infrastructure and attract dedicated funding). Of course its always easier to blame providers and delivery partners than bad management.

Your point about Derriford making appointments work so why can't others is a very good one. Why can't they? Its evidently not a cost reason if some can run good appointments systems and others treat patients as an inconvenient obligation.

Around here the standard model for appointments is the same as that described by @Kazzyhoward - everyone rocks up at 9.30 and you sit there, sometimes all day, waiting to be seen. Because obviously patient time is of no value or importance. You have to arrange school pickups and pay for parking, cover for work, lose a day's pay as if you were going on a day trip somewhere.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread