Does anyone want to know why???
Tough, I'm gonna explain it anyway. This is due to an anatomical variance. For many people, each digit from index to little has two muscles that bend it.
The one that attaches to the middle joint of the finger (the proximal interphalangeal joint) is called the flexor digitorum superficialis and can bend that middle joint independently with everything else staying still.
The one that attaches to the top joint (the distal interphalangeal joint) is called flexor digitorum profundus. Now THIS muscle has 3 tendons that attach to the middle, ring and little fingers. It works all three fingers together, so if you're using it to move the little finger, you have to move the ring (and the middle) too.
If you can move your little finger to flexion by itself it means you have all the muscles you should have. If you can't.... Well you're missing a muscle I'm afraid.
But it gets MORE interesting. Because this muscle is not just present or absent. Sometimes (and this is known primarily from cadaver studies), the muscle is present but it has no tendon linking it to the finger. Sometimes, the tendon is there but no muscle. And sometimes, it's all there but under developed (a presentation known as vestigial).
So why the variation????
Evolution.
We know the variety seen across the population represents change. But given the VERY slow speed of change in evolution of a species that reproduce the way we do, we DO NOT KNOW FOR SURE which presentation is the more evolved. There are a variety of theories (more muscles= good, we're evolving to have extra vs. we're becoming a lazy bunch who don't need to catch our own food so no need for all these muscles.)
So, I cordially invite you to a bun fight about whether your emotional support fingers are a sign you are ahead of the curve, or whether the independent movers are further ahead on our evolutionary path.
Sorry everyone, can't turn off the geek.