I watched a Jordan Peterson clip in Youtube where he gives as one reason why women tend to be a small minority among very high-earners is that they are more sensible. Women get to about age 30 and see that to go down that path means working maybe 80-hour weeks, no time for friends, no time to maintain family relationships, no time for any interests outside of work, and think "fuck that for a game of soldiers."
I think (I hope I'm not misrepresenting him) that he said like women generally are much more middle-of-the-road than men, psychologically, which is why men dominate at all extremes of human behaviour, both good and bad.
I did once come across the Youtube channel of a young woman (still twenties I think) who was the epitome of what he was talking about. She was a six-figure earner as a lawyer in her mid-20's who was told in no uncertain terms by her boss in a Saturday phone-call that she could not endanger a project deadline by spending time with her much-loved dying granny, on the very day she did in fact, later on, die. He knew the granny was on her deathbed, but told the woman explicitly that the reason she was paid so much was that she was supposed to put client priorities ahead of that. She did prioritise work, regretted it, and quit her job shortly afterwards.
Of course lots of people earn six-figures without it being so extreme, but that doesn't mean the generalisation of large sacrifices often being required is wrong.
Having said all that, in my marriage it's the woman who is working long hours, for money that not only will she never spend, but that is likely to make a significant difference to her child's inheritance. (Because the child is already likely to inherit plenty.) So I know there are some irrationally work-obsessed women.