Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to think the whole idea of retirement is going to become unrealistic

209 replies

worksmartandfast · 15/06/2022 20:27

I am sad writing this as I think it is a truely nice idea that people get to take some time out to enjoy life but my practical head says it can't continue. When the age was set to retire that was a policy made for a totally different era, people started work at 15 and died at 65 in general society has completely changed since then. It was never envisaged that education would last so long for children/young people it is really an accident of history that for the last decades it has been possible to effectively stop working in their early 60s/late 50s despite being perfectly capable adults and spend potentially 15/20 years living a life of pure leisure. While I'm sure this idea will be unpopular in reality I can't see how in a world with ever better medical care increasing life expentancy it can be expected that it will be possible for it to be the norm that most people can spend the final quater of their lives retired even if they are perfectly able to work. Aibu?

OP posts:
Dishwashersaurous · 16/06/2022 20:07

And I know that my calculation was very basic but it's illustrated the

pfills · 16/06/2022 20:07

I’ve not taken anything I wasn’t entitled to.

You're aware you are one individual & when talking about millions of people there will be differences. If everyone paid millions in tax then none of this would be an issue.

ancientgran · 16/06/2022 20:09

pfills · 16/06/2022 20:01

Of course I don't pay NI now, still paying tax though.

From next year you will pay the h&s levy as that won't cease upon pension age.

I probably won't as I think I will retire at 70 although my boss says he won't let me!

Dishwashersaurous · 16/06/2022 20:10

And the state pension is not an investment fund. Payments are made out of current contributions.

There is no individual pot which people save. It goes into a general pot

ancientgran · 16/06/2022 20:12

Dishwashersaurous · 16/06/2022 20:10

And the state pension is not an investment fund. Payments are made out of current contributions.

There is no individual pot which people save. It goes into a general pot

I think we all know that but if you are going to value our contributions it is reasonable to include notional interest, if the govt hadn't had our money it would have had to borrow it and pay interest.

pfills · 16/06/2022 20:15

@ancientgran 🤞🏼

DuesToTheDirt · 16/06/2022 20:28

Sandcastles24 · 16/06/2022 19:03

ANBU

This generation is so entitled to think they deserve decades of retirement. When the state pensions were initially created they where only supposed to fund 3 years on average THREE. People are living way longer even if life expectancy are finally stalling. Why should the younger generation be funding the decades of retirement when they can't even save a fraction of that for their own. They will never get that because it is unsustainable

Let me repeat. The taxes from 40 years of working does not cover decades of retirement. You have not earned it!!

Absolutely. Pensions were supposed to prevent people becoming destitute in old age, or financial burdens to their families. They were never intended to fund 30 years of cruises, and new cars every few years.

iwishiwasafish · 16/06/2022 20:39

I can’t quite get my head around this thread. Are people genuinely suggesting that all savings or passive income sources be confiscated from people when they reach 67, or is it “just” the state pension people want to abolish?

minipie · 16/06/2022 20:40

Nobody wants to abolish anything Confused we are saying it will become unaffordable for most people to have a long retirement.

ancientgran · 16/06/2022 20:46

DuesToTheDirt · 16/06/2022 20:28

Absolutely. Pensions were supposed to prevent people becoming destitute in old age, or financial burdens to their families. They were never intended to fund 30 years of cruises, and new cars every few years.

The state pension isn't funding cruises and new cars. If people have provided for their retirement in other ways that is up to them.

ancientgran · 16/06/2022 20:49

Just to clarify my state pension after 50 years of work is just under £800 a month, well 4 weeks. If anyone seriously thinks that is giving me the money for cruises (never been on one) or a new car every few years (mine is 6 years old and I plan on it lasting till I give up driving) or some sort of luxury lifestyle they are obviously alot better at managing their money than I am.

pfills · 16/06/2022 20:59

If people have provided for their retirement in other ways that is up to them.

How is a young person meant to pay for their education, afford a house & save for a pension against a backdrop of wage stagnation & ever increasing costs?

onlythreenow · 16/06/2022 21:02

Pensions were supposed to prevent people becoming destitute in old age, or financial burdens to their families. They were never intended to fund 30 years of cruises, and new cars every few years.

Do you seriously believe that is what a state pension funds??? You do realise that money is all some people have to live on.

DuesToTheDirt · 16/06/2022 21:11

onlythreenow · 16/06/2022 21:02

Pensions were supposed to prevent people becoming destitute in old age, or financial burdens to their families. They were never intended to fund 30 years of cruises, and new cars every few years.

Do you seriously believe that is what a state pension funds??? You do realise that money is all some people have to live on.

OK, so I made my comments based on my mum, who lived this lifestyle for years before she became too unwell. And it was not just on a state pension. But she has a defined benefit pension, which is no longer (never? rarely?) an option as the finances for them just don't add up with people living so much longer now. She also had a retirement age of 60, not 67 as it is currently.

ILoveYoga · 16/06/2022 21:16

What very much needs to change is educating people to start to safe for retirement much earlier, educating SAHM they they need to top up their state pensions too. We seriously started thinking about our retirement at 30 and started planning. We topped up pensions when we could, did pre tax additional voluntary contributions and made sure our mortgage would be paid off by 60.

so educating people to think about retirement early massively helps them in long run

Sandcastles24 · 16/06/2022 21:21

I am not saying it is enough to live of. It isn't very generous in amount. It is the length of time it is paid for that is completely unsustainable compared to the tax burden on the next generation

Sandcastles24 · 16/06/2022 21:22

There is a reason defined benefit pensions don't exist any more

Sandcastles24 · 16/06/2022 21:26

There is a reason defined benefit pensions don't exist any more (or won't soon) for new entries

ancientgran · 16/06/2022 21:28

pfills · 16/06/2022 20:59

If people have provided for their retirement in other ways that is up to them.

How is a young person meant to pay for their education, afford a house & save for a pension against a backdrop of wage stagnation & ever increasing costs?

I don't know, how did I save in the 70s with rampant inflation and for women the problem with a bigger pay gap than now. I literally earned half what the guy sitting at the next desk did for doing the same job. Then there was my 16% interest rate on the mortgage in the 80s, followed by my husband becoming disabled and unable to work in the 90s. It isn't easy is it.

I didn't have to worry about paying for my education as I left school at 15.

ancientgran · 16/06/2022 21:29

Looking at that no wonder I'm still working at 69. Roll on 70.

HandbagsnGladrags · 16/06/2022 21:34

I fucking hope not. I'm 52 and feeling like I can't work for much longer.

ancientgran · 16/06/2022 21:50

HandbagsnGladrags · 16/06/2022 21:34

I fucking hope not. I'm 52 and feeling like I can't work for much longer.

I think I got a second wind. At 63 I went part time and a similar job but in a less pressured environment. I enjoy work more at 69 than I did at 52. I think I'd struggle to work fulltime but then I am also my husband's carer as he's been disabled for over 30 years so that is an added pressure.

iwishiwasafish · 16/06/2022 22:00

I don't know, how did I save in the 70s with rampant inflation and for women the problem with a bigger pay gap than now. I literally earned half what the guy sitting at the next desk did for doing the same job. Then there was my 16% interest rate on the mortgage in the 80s, followed by my husband becoming disabled and unable to work in the 90s. It isn't easy is it.

I didn't have to worry about paying for my education as I left school at 15.

Well said!

pfills · 16/06/2022 22:10

I don't know, how did I save in the 70s with rampant inflation and for women the problem with a bigger pay gap than now. I literally earned half what the guy sitting at the next desk did for doing the same job. Then there was my 16% interest rate on the mortgage in the 80s, followed by my husband becoming disabled and unable to work in the 90s. It isn't easy is it.

😆 Who said it was ever easy? I mean we could pretend that it's not get harder but what's the point of that?
I don't have an issue acknowledging that some things were far easier for me (buying a house, getting a foot in a good career without having the best qualifications, etc). And I would definitely take the high interest rates on a cheaper property & the wage growth!
The country never really recovered from 08, through Brexit & covid into the mix & it's a disaster.

Schoolchoicesucks · 16/06/2022 23:29

FourTeaFallOut · 16/06/2022 08:05

The are places in the UK where average healthy life expectancy fall so short compared to pensionable age that it seems like a cruel joke.

The place with the lowest male healthy life expectancy at birth is Blackpool (53.7 years), followed by Belfast (54.4 years) and Glasgow (54.6 years).

I'm not sure what the answer is but I think it needs a strategy to include the staggering differences in health equality across the country.

Those life expectancies don't tally with what I see on Google (Blackpool 74/79, Belfast 76/80 and Glasgow 79/83). Where are they from?