Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Nothing will change while parents are so sexist

153 replies

12Thorns · 10/06/2022 07:03

Just in the last half hour on MN I’ve read posts from a pregnant mother wanting to know if her ‘gender scan’ is likely to be correct before she goes shopping for her newborn, and a mother arguing 7 boys should be allowed to play football at break times when they are excluding a boy with ADHD, and not half a thought for the girls being not only excluded from the game, but also from the space the game is played in, and we all know football takes up most of the playing space available

what hope is there for any sort of equality when such attitudes are so deeply ingrained and passed on to babies and children?

OP posts:
12Thorns · 10/06/2022 09:57

There is nothing inherently make about football! It’s a great game for girls and women

OP posts:
dameofdilemma · 10/06/2022 09:57

“Nothing will change because people don't really want it to.
They especially don't want it to when it comes to employment/childcare
Quite happy to keep the status quo of sahm / working dad”

This.

You’d have to be walking around with a blindfold and fingers in your ears not to realise we live in a sexist society with the odds stacked in favour of men. And yes that starts from an early age.

Unfortunately some people really don’t want to think about it - because it makes them uncomfortable, unhappy, anxious etc. It’s why ‘feminist’ is sometimes used as a derogatory term.
And for 49% of the population there is a great deal to be lost by shining a light on gender based inequality.

So yes, be bothered, be angry, care about the society our daughters are growing up in and what we are teaching our sons. Including in the playground.

Namenic · 10/06/2022 10:12

@RaisinGhost - I personally find dolls boring but agree with your sentiment.

As well as encouraging women into ceo and stem jobs, we should also be encouraging men into developing domestic skills and doing things like homework/music practice with kids.

DarkShade · 10/06/2022 10:14

It's interesting how culture shapes it. My friend from the US tells me football is more of a girls sport over there,the boys tend to play American football or basketball. So for her growing up football was a neutral-to-girls activity.

The key to gender balance imo is to treasure all ways of playing. I sometimes worry we only care about toys that will promote monetised skills. But playing with dolls is great to encourage compassion and care Roles.

Toy kitchen is a standard gender neutral toy, perhaps once It would have been a girls toy. This is good! We need to keep doing the same for all toys. Agree it drives me mad when we see "girls Lego" and it's Lego but pastel.

Bumpitybumper · 10/06/2022 10:17

I find it ironic that on threads like this the argument is always that the feminine alternatives are inferior to the male and the only non-sexist approach is for both sexes to be treated exactly the same which normally means to be treated like boys.

How often do I read that girls clothes are inferior to boys clothes because they are less practical as if that's the only measure that counts? In reality everyone knows that a huge factor when buying clothes is how aesthetically pleasing they are. When my son was a toddler he was drawn to princess dresses and sparkly things because they are fun and attractive. The sexist element was actually when he was taught these things weren't acceptable for boys. Boys are pushed down the practical clothing route where there is less scope for variety. You can get pretty girly athletic wear very easily if that's the appropriate clothing for an activity but practical isn't always best.

The drive towards gender neutrality in clothing is just eradicating difference and choice as is every other move toward eradicating or denigrating the feminine. Unicorns, fairies, tractors and dinosaurs are all fun themes that children are naturally drawn to. Football, dancing, karate and swimming are all fun pursuits. STEM subjects and humanities all have their place and add value to our society. Being a SAHP or a working parent are valid choices made to suit your family.

It isn't sexist for girls to not want to play football or to wear pink, it is sexist to place value judgements on these choices and assume that their choices are inferior or have less value. Society has stigmatised and devalued the feminine to the point where women are desperate to ditch any association with traditionally female pursuits or interests for fear of looking weak or inferior. This is a tragedy and the ultimate victory for misogyny and sexism.

Topgub · 10/06/2022 10:19

@Bumpitybumper

Being a SAHP or a working parent are valid choices made to suit your family.

Except its 98% of the time the choice for the woman to be the sahp that 'suits the family'

How is that still a valid choice?

Bingbangbongbash · 10/06/2022 10:27

@whenwillthemadnessend

re: single sex schooling

there is plenty of evidence to show girls do better in single sex environments, including choosing STEM subjects more often - presumably because there is no notion that there are boys’ subjects & girls’ subjects - it’s all just school.

Until society values and supports girls as much as boys I’m all for helping them however we can - including single sex education.

CanaryWharf2 · 10/06/2022 10:28

12Thorns · 10/06/2022 07:03

Just in the last half hour on MN I’ve read posts from a pregnant mother wanting to know if her ‘gender scan’ is likely to be correct before she goes shopping for her newborn, and a mother arguing 7 boys should be allowed to play football at break times when they are excluding a boy with ADHD, and not half a thought for the girls being not only excluded from the game, but also from the space the game is played in, and we all know football takes up most of the playing space available

what hope is there for any sort of equality when such attitudes are so deeply ingrained and passed on to babies and children?

There was nothing even hinting at girls being excluded in the posts about football. Why the dishonesty?

MarieIVanArkleStinks · 10/06/2022 10:30

It's not just a pink, blue divide anymore either. It's pastels for girls, primary colours or for clothing, dark khakis/navys for boys. Apparently vivid purple is now also a 'girl' colour, according to assumptions surrounding the colour of my son's pram.

Capitalism is in no small part responsible. It's a very clever marketing strategy designed to maximise profit. And it's capitalising very effectively on lazy ideological assumption (but all little girls like pink!) and social stereotypes.

I've never made those kinds of distinctions, but when nearly every shop is neatly racked with them and advertising bombards you from ever conceivable angle, it's easy to take at face value what you see.

CanaryWharf2 · 10/06/2022 10:32

AWobABobBob · 10/06/2022 09:50

Wow just wow. I think you're a prime example of what the OP is referring to. So many stereotypes in your post. I wouldn't be surprised if you're a man as your post comes across incredibly sexist.

Do you see the irony in what you just posted there?

12Thorns · 10/06/2022 10:33

CanaryWharf2 · 10/06/2022 10:28

There was nothing even hinting at girls being excluded in the posts about football. Why the dishonesty?

girls we’re not even mentioned. It was just taken for granted automatically that they were excluded

OP posts:
CanaryWharf2 · 10/06/2022 10:37

12Thorns · 10/06/2022 10:33

girls we’re not even mentioned. It was just taken for granted automatically that they were excluded

Taken for granted by you, yes. There was nothing in the thread saying that they were excluded.

supersonicspider · 10/06/2022 10:39

The reason so many primary school girls do not join in with the football at break time is because they wear unsupportive, strappy pump shoes. They are completely unsuitable for playing football or running around in.

12Thorns · 10/06/2022 11:01

CanaryWharf2 · 10/06/2022 10:37

Taken for granted by you, yes. There was nothing in the thread saying that they were excluded.

It was Inherant in the op

OP posts:
AffableApple · 10/06/2022 11:01

It's those damned bows people put on babies' heads that do my head in. The annoyances and impositions of "feminine beauty" imposed before they can even sit up, just so mummy doesn't suffer the horror of someone mistakening her child for a boy in passing🙄

theworldhas · 10/06/2022 11:09

@22N

Well, as just one example, this thorough and peer reviewed paper which analysed the combined findings of 75 historical studies into toy preference found large and significant differences. Slightly more reliable than your “pop into any nursery” anecdote.

scoobycute · 10/06/2022 11:09

An expectant mother wishing to shop for her unborn son and a group of boys playing football at school is in no way shape or form "so sexist"

theworldhas · 10/06/2022 11:09

link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-019-01624-7#Sec22
here

Boiledbeetle · 10/06/2022 11:16

Georgeskitchen · 10/06/2022 09:35

I would be interesting to know how many women who are howling about the "injustice of "forcing little girls to wear little girls clothing" actually spend their days wearing mens clothes?
Has it occurred to anyone that little girls might actually like wearing little girls clothes?

Well this little girl hated little girl clothes. Pink was a definite no no and i could be found in jeans or dungarees or shorts most of the time. I didn't own any dresses or skirts, and still don't!

In school I wore the boys uniform rather than the girls. As an adult I am currently dressed in clothes, except for bra and knickers, from the men's section of Sainsbury's Tu.

A lot of girls aren't comfy in "girls" clothes.

Sirzy · 10/06/2022 11:20

A lot of people seem to have taken it from one extreme to the other which can be equally as harmful and restrictive of individuality.

milkmaiden · 10/06/2022 11:20

12Thorns · 10/06/2022 07:22

I know girls can play football. Many of them want to. My point is that they were being excluded, thoughtlessly, as a matter of course, as if it was the most normal natural thing in the world

It is normal and is a matter of course. I remember an assembly in 1988 when we were all complaining we were not allowed to play football as girls, they said you can't play and only a few want to anyway. They were not actually wrong.

Fewer girls are into it if you take a sample of say 100 children, it's just the way it is. If a girl wants to play she needs to assert herself the way a boy would do.

BaronessEllarawrosaurus · 10/06/2022 11:20

Why do boys play football and girls stand around chatting? Is it nature or nurture. The fact in other places it's different would suggest it's nurture.

My youngest has some amazing female role models in her life involved in stem and still after she started pre school nursery suddenly things started becoming either boys or girls things. I'll never give up fighting to convince her that girls can do whatever they want but ffs it shouldn't have to be such a battle

Feetache · 10/06/2022 11:28

Women were banned from playing football for 50 years by the FA.
Generations of parents grew up being told girls were not allowed to play football as it wasn't suitable for them.
The attitude is still ingrained 30 years later. Sad but true.

purpleboy · 10/06/2022 11:32

Everyday sexism is rife, and so ingrained in society, so many comments on this thread just prove that.

Wheresmywoolyjumpers · 10/06/2022 11:36

we are in a deeply sexist moment - just try to find baby clothes that are anything other than pink or blue. The issue is that things like this seem really small and unimportant to most people, but all stack up to a whole expectation. I despair.