Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To feel sad for Prince Harry

417 replies

OldManRivers · 06/06/2022 12:07

Have been looking at the photos today of Harry in the car being driven from the airport in America back to his home. He looks so sad. It must be very difficult for him to attend a huge family occasion like that with his role drastically changed, and to see all of his family but now he's on the sidelines popping in so very sporadically.

Also I can't help but think he must feel sad to think his children won't grow up around their cousins, and extended family. Meghan doesn't have any family except her mother so they don't have any in America either.

Originally he and Meghan wanted to carry on being part of the royal machine and do appearances etc but also have some independence so it's not as though this life was their original plan, where it seems like they're sidelined and alienated. AIBU to think regardless of what's gone on it must be very hard for him to be in another country, away from his ailing grandmother who he is very close to, and feel like a bit of an outcast?

OP posts:
Ithoughtsummerwascoming · 07/06/2022 06:49

It's great he can keep his children private.
As much as I loved seeing Kate and William children they are being paraded by the same machine aren't they although they seem more protected than William and Harry were.

Dinoteeth · 07/06/2022 07:57

I actually don't know why Harry felt the need to release the birthday photo. We don't get birthday photos of the Wessex, Yorks, or Philips children.

It seems to be 'thing' for the Cambridges in exchange for those kids never being filmed or papped on holiday or normal family days out. They have more privacy than William and Harry had growing up. We never see photos of George & co unless they are at official events and their birthdays.

Wheresthebeach · 07/06/2022 08:55

According to 'The Fail' the Queen banned the photographer they wanted to have take a picture of her meeting Lilibet for the first time...if it's true, it shows the length the RF are having to go to protect their privacy. I'm not surprised nobody wants to talk to them really, they must be terrified of everything they say being repeated, out of context, to the media. All this from people who are desperate for privacy...

letsnotdothat · 07/06/2022 08:59

I think people would have a lot more respect for him if he’d said he’d always struggled mentally with public scrutiny, media intrusion etc and that his wife was now also struggling so he’d like to escape it and move away to have a private life… then actually be private and avoid media attention as much as possible. Instead they have both courted the media ever since they left with various interviews, Netflix shows and so forth. That’s where my sympathy fell flat because I did completely understand why he chose to move to America initially.

Bellevu · 07/06/2022 09:12

letsnotdothat · 07/06/2022 08:59

I think people would have a lot more respect for him if he’d said he’d always struggled mentally with public scrutiny, media intrusion etc and that his wife was now also struggling so he’d like to escape it and move away to have a private life… then actually be private and avoid media attention as much as possible. Instead they have both courted the media ever since they left with various interviews, Netflix shows and so forth. That’s where my sympathy fell flat because I did completely understand why he chose to move to America initially.

How many interviews have they done since leaving the 'working' part of the Royal family?

LondonWolf · 07/06/2022 09:22

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

SeriaIBreeder · 07/06/2022 09:25

People don't like largely unfounded accusations of racism being levelled against them. Who knew eh?

What makes you think it's not true, besides the fact you don't like them? It is racist to speculate on the colour of someone else's baby, especially negatively. If you don't think it is, maybe you are, too.

DashboardConfessional · 07/06/2022 09:26

Bellevu · 07/06/2022 09:12

How many interviews have they done since leaving the 'working' part of the Royal family?

Bloody loads. I don't feel like trawling google, but he did the Today show on NBC and a People magazine cover interview in April alone.

recklessgran · 07/06/2022 09:33

Nothing stopping them from staying at Frogmore if they wanted too as apparently they've renewed the lease. As everyone says, Harry made his choice [well I suspect Meghan made it for him.] Lets face it, she's cut off from all her family apart from her mother and has made sure that Harry's cut off from his. If I was a member of the RF I certainly would be extremely cagey about conversing with them at all after the Oprah interview. That alone burnt their bridges and was unforgivable in my opinion in terms of what it must have done to the poor old Queen.

ShaIlIOrShallINot · 07/06/2022 09:41

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Also racist dont like accusations of racism being levelled against them.

Dinoteeth · 07/06/2022 10:07

@letsnotdothat I totally agree.
They said they wanted privacy but continued to court the media.

Even releasing photos of Lili, what's that about really?

The only Royals who do it are the Cambridges and that seems to be in exchange for not having the press follow them around on holidays or days out.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 07/06/2022 10:16

The press was never over the top racist and 99% of it wasn't even a little bit. That Oprah interview they did had to pull headlines from totally different countries, or edit them, to get anything like that

I wouldn't have said 99%, but do agree it was a shame about the headline editing. As with the word being "right over Meghan's face" I'd have thought some of it was bad enough without having to make things up

For me this comes back to the thing about if you've got something to say then say it - but don't lie, because that can lead to people questioning everything else you've claimed.
And before anyone says "But the palace lie all the time!!", yes they do - which is why the same applies to them

JudgeJ · 07/06/2022 11:23

OldManRivers · 06/06/2022 12:24

I'm not anti either of them either, and I think that they probably do have a lovely happy life in California on a day to day basis. I just think it's so incredibly hard to cut yourself off from your entire family - which is just about what he's done. Even if their are problems in your family with a couple of people, to leave everything behind would be extremely difficult for anyone never mind someone who had only known life as a royal.

I believe he regrets the Oprah interview, and I bet he wishes he, Meghan and the children could still be part of the family.

I totally agree about the WImfrey interview, even at the time he apparently looked uncomfortable with some of the things his wife was saying. If they wanted to step back from being full time working royals they could have done that without going for the nuclear option. Other grandchildren of HM are not working for the Firm but are there to support HM when called upon and he could have had a similar life, even if the US or Canada was their main home.

Sadly I think he is very unhappy at the moment, I hope he can find some peace in his life, he was probably saying farewell to his grandmother, little wonder he looked very pensive.

JudgeJ · 07/06/2022 11:25

ShaIlIOrShallINot · 07/06/2022 09:41

Also racist dont like accusations of racism being levelled against them.

Constantly levelling 'racism' against anyone who has a negative thought is in itself a form of 'racism', white people shouldn't comment.

JudgeJ · 07/06/2022 11:31

It is racist to speculate on the colour of someone else's baby

Then I know lots of people who are in families of different heritage who you could throw that accusation against! When a baby is expected parents to be, families, friends often debate characteristics, a Ghanaian friend married to a Japanese woman is having some real fun at the moment. It's not nasty, it's normal behaviour.

thebellagio · 07/06/2022 11:41

I think my opinion is that this is all Harry's fault.

I think he rushed into marriage without truly preparing Meghan for what to expect. Chelsy and Cressida both walked away because they knew they couldn't handle the pressure - so he should have made damn sure that Meghan knew what she was signing up for.

He was the head of a mental health charity and had been open about having therapy, so why the hell, when his pregnant wife told him she felt suicidal did he not seek help for her? He openly admitted his response was to tell her to put on a posh frock and take her to the theatre. What a shitty husband.

For someone who had grown up in another country, was hugely independent and a hard worker, and had strong opinions, it was always going to be a monumental culture shock for her to discovered that she was never going to be allowed an opinion on anything, ever again. That's an absolute mind fuck, so I really truly don't blame her for freaking out and wanting to go back to some resemblance of normality.

However.

I genuinely believe that the pair of them could have easily walked away with a lifestyle similar to the York sisters, whereby they could live their own lives, yet still honour the family where needed.

But the way that they left - the petulant "service is for everyone" remark, the comment about how they could use the word 'royal' outside of the UK, announcing their departure before the details had been ironed out, moaning about having to give it a year's trial, then the Oprah interview and suing the UK government...that's where they went wrong. To me, they didn't just burn their bridges, they threw a fucking Molotov cocktail at the bridge.

I think that Harry has never heard the word 'no' in his life. Therefore, he was genuinely stunned that he couldn't get what he wanted, hence the constant hissy fits. Its a real shame that he's burnt his bridges so badly that him and his family cant participate in things with the rest of the wider family - e.g. the party at the palace and the parade with everyone else. That would have been lovely to see a real bonding moment there and to be honest, I can't see how they will ever resolve it.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 07/06/2022 11:42

Speaking of the possibility that things have been made up, does anyone have a link to the Mail's alleged "original headline" quoting Jo Marney's disgusting remark about Meghan's seed? And preferably something that really is original, rather than an edit job from Twitter?

I'm aware that they quoted this in the context of Jo being removed from UKIP (and a damned good thing too), but not that they published it without that context, so I'd rather like to see this for myself

DFOD · 07/06/2022 11:49

JemimaPuddlegoose · 06/06/2022 22:08

Was the MM racism always there in the press from day one? I don’t read the red tops (maybe it was also there in the broadsheets) - was it bubbling under subtly and then gathered a head of steam? Can anyone pinpoint an event / timeline when the either the tide turned or was it a slow build?

From the tabloids, yes I think so. The "Straight Outta Compton" Daily Mail headline was from 2016, and was the first headline to overtly reference a racist stereotype, and the same year the Mail published an article referring to Doria's "exotic DNA."

Harry's statement against the racist bullying in the press was all the way back in November 2016, and the statement claimed they'd been dealing with defamatory articles on a daily basis, as well as having to call the police over pap break-ins. So even in the very early stages of their relationship, it was evidently pretty bad.

The Daily Mail responded to the engagement news in 2017 by publishing a headline saying "Yes, they're in love. So why do I have niggles about the engagement photo" where the word NIGGLES was right over her face. And before people start complaining that niggles is a perfectly ordinary, non-racist word; yes it is. Of course the word niggles is not inherently racist, and people use it every day in non-racist contexts. But context does matter. Niggles is an odd word choice to use in this context, and it seems pretty obvious that plastering a word that's one letter different from a racial slur all over Meghan's face was a goady dog whistle.

The following year the Daily Mail published a headline reading, "Meghan's seed will taint our Royal Family" - the headline was actually a quote from a text that the girlfriend of a UKIP MP had sent, which had resulted in her being suspended from UKIP. But the Mail initially chose to use just that as their headline, and later edited it to read "UKIP leader's girlfriend suspended over racist texts.

A lot of it was subtle, dog whistles and things with racist undertones, rather than very overt racism. This can actually be more problematic and insidious than overt racism, since it leads to black women being gaslighted and told they're being oversensitive, or that they're imagining racism.

Regardless of the racial component, there was certainly an extraordinary amount of abuse and hostility towards Meghan in the press, pretty much from the start.

That's really interesting that the racist British press were at it from the beginning in an underhand way that not everyone could see so overtly. They obviously know that this sells papers and as PP has said is a covert dog whistle to the public who overtly post racist comments.

How did the rest of the RF respond in 2016? Did they support Harry's complaints from the top and from the start?

If not how would it have benefited the firm/RF to collude or allow this to happen?

My personal experience was one of sensing positivity through their relationship, engagement, wedding, trips abroad and birth of Archie etc - maybe I was just in a different echo chamber. I am not denying this was happening as it clearly did just can't fathom what the RF role in it was?

Dinoteeth · 07/06/2022 11:54

They could easily have had a life like the Yorks and Phillips.
The Wessex are full working Royals but guard their privacy and their children few people would recognise their kids in the street.

But they seemed to wants the glam bits of being royal without the mundane opening community centers.
And they desperately wanted to trade of the Royal name and connections. It never worked for Edward either.

My predictions for the future is he and Meg will split and he'll slowly work his way back into the Royal fold.

Wheresthebeach · 07/06/2022 11:56

@thebellagio I think you've made some good points. I wonder if he didn't brief her fully because the others had walked away.

Their behaviour has been very spoilt - complete public fits when they didn't get what they wanted. Combined with a bizarre level of helplessness - if Meighan was suffering why didn't he get help? Why was it the palaces job? He'd been in therapy so it's not like he couldn't pick up the phone easily enough.

It comes across like everything wrong is someone else's fault, they are victims, and it's all unfair so I'm going to throw my toys out of my pram. In public so everyone understand how hard done I am. It's like complaining about being 'cut off' financially, in your thirties, when you've £34 mil in the bank. I don't get why people weren't outraged by the entitlement.

DFOD · 07/06/2022 11:57

MangyInseam · 06/06/2022 23:55

No, the press was never over the top racist and 99% of it wasn't even a little bit. THat Oprah interview they did had to pull headlines from totally different countries, or edit them, to get anything like that.

Most people were very positive and seemed quite pleased about the whole thing, including in the press. The tone changed because people came to dislike her. Which may not have been fair but it wasn't a race thing.

When and why did people come to dislike her @MangyInseam?

And what people are you referring to - the immediate RF (C&C, W&K?), the broader RF firm “men in grey suits”, the press or the public?

MangyInseam · 07/06/2022 12:00

People came to dislike her because she and Harry seemed to be taking the piss, mainly.

But it doesn't really matter, there are all kinds of royals the press have not liked, sometimes quite unfairly. Racism is hardly the only explanation.

SeriaIBreeder · 07/06/2022 12:08

JudgeJ · 07/06/2022 11:31

It is racist to speculate on the colour of someone else's baby

Then I know lots of people who are in families of different heritage who you could throw that accusation against! When a baby is expected parents to be, families, friends often debate characteristics, a Ghanaian friend married to a Japanese woman is having some real fun at the moment. It's not nasty, it's normal behaviour.

@JudgeJ No. another family member who is asking whether the baby will be too dark is racism. Black people are NOT exempt from colourism either, it's very common for people to check babies' ears at birth to see the colour.

It is not normal to question how dark another persons baby is. It IS normal to wonder what you're baby will look like. We're not stupid, nor is Meghan.

SeriaIBreeder · 07/06/2022 12:13

MangyInseam · 07/06/2022 12:00

People came to dislike her because she and Harry seemed to be taking the piss, mainly.

But it doesn't really matter, there are all kinds of royals the press have not liked, sometimes quite unfairly. Racism is hardly the only explanation.

I don't know what alternative there is to the irrational hate - the people who actually follow people they hate (more than people who like them!). Not everyone is, but out of all of the people who hate her I'd guess racism plays a role.

Definitely those who deny the racism accusations. Whether or not you like Meghan, you don't have to snip and poke holes in everything she does.

Insertusername123 · 07/06/2022 12:25

I have never warmed to MM because she reminds me very much of someone I know. And I think this maybe the same for others.

Yes this is from media reports,and their own interviews,not for personal experiences but I think others have come to the same conclusion.

This person used me,and others for their own gain. Once I saw through her and stood up to her she never spoke to me again,yet from the outside she had friends. These people were similar to her,or were scared of her.

I think we all went to school with a women like MM,we've all worked with a women like her and we have all seen the fallout to someone we care about when a women like her turns.

Its nothing to do with the skin colour of her father or where she was born,she just doesn't come across as a nice person and maybe the public are protective of Harry after his mothers death.