My son is 20. His dad - my ex - bought him a brand new car when he passed his test a few years ago.
Now my ex is contacting me saying he wants to trade my son's car up for a new model and will I pay half the monthly fees? He has suggested "simply" taking my half off the child maintenance he pays for my 16 year old daughter (which in itself is only enough to cover bills etc).
I give my son an extra amount to help top up his student loan every month which just about gets him through. He's actually being good with the money and trying to eke it out but one of his biggest expenses is his car insurance.
I have told my ex no - I won't be contributing half towards a new car. I work for myself - what the energy bills going up etc, the last thing anyone needs is an extra expense. And why does a 20 year old need a brand new car every few years? If my ex wants to go ahead and pay for it himself then fine.
I do understand there's some financial logic in trading up every few years rather than running a car in to the ground for years... but AIBU? Am I missing something?
My ex is a classic narcissist and one of the things he used to do while I was with him was pressure me into taking on more loans - cars, mortgages, home improvements, even though I earned less than him. I recognise he is doing it all over again and using emotionally loaded language (Don't you want him to have a safe car? etc - I replied as long as he keeps it MOTd and serviced then his current car will be safe.
My ex told my son about getting him the new car before he discussed it with me and now he has a call today with the car dealers - so it's all last minute as per usual. I've told him he shouldn't have told our son before discussing it with me if he wanted me to pay half.
I have also mentioned that while my son stands to get a new car, my daughter stands to lose out as money intended for her will go to a new car for her brother.
I'm standing firm on this - but just wanted to check again - AIBU?