@Dontcallmebabylalala
I’ll celebrate the day when dogs of this and similar breeds are finally banned. I know it’s not an easy and/or very defined process, but there is NO safety to anyone when the dogs like this are around. A child lost life recently and it’s one too many deaths that are totally preventable. There is no reason to have a pet designed to kill.
"dogs like this and similar breeds" - exactly what breeds are you talking about here? The OP didn't know what breed the dog was, she said "Pit Bull type" but clearly it couldn't have been as those are banned, probably a Staffy.
If you are talking about allregognised bully breeds, you're including Bull Terriers, Bulldogs, Boston Terriers, Great Danes, French Bulldogs, Bull Mastifs, Pugs etc as well as Staffys. So where do you draw the line - ban Bull Terriers, but keep Frenchies & pugs etc? Ban Boston Terriers but keep Great Danes?
You are talking about some of the smallest and largest breeds of dog in this country, just about all of which are now "pet" breeds rather than "working" breeds.
Then again if you were talking about any breed that has a reputation of being "dangerous", outside of those named in the Dangerous Dogs Act, the vast majority of those only behave the way they have been trained to behave. A good example of this is the Doberman, a breed that has been trained and used as a guard dog for a long time but at the same time makes a fabulous gentle family pet IF TRAINED THAT WAY.
On the other side of the coin you have some of the smaller terrier breeds e.g. Yorkie, Jack Russell, who can be vicious little beasties and the only reason they don't cause deaths is their size - again, all down to how they are brought up & trained (or not trained, in many cases). The majority of these breeds are fine, but there are a few examples I wouldn't leave a child with!
I don't have any dogs, my lifestyle wouldn't be fair on one.