Bagel Alternative provision doesn’t have to be traditional learning. It could be therapies (SALT, OT, hydro, rebound, MH therapies), Mindjam, a mentor/TA to play with, subscription to a magazine, subscription box, if able to accessing the community (soft play, swimming, park, cafe, trampolining), sensory/exercise equipment, craft supplies. All depends on DS’s needs and interests.
Do you think one of the schools can meet DS’s needs? If so, is the school wholly independent? If not, the LA can and must name them regardless of the school’s objections unless they can prove:
- The setting is unsuitable for the age, ability, aptitude or special educational needs (“SEN”) of the child or young person; or
- The attendance of the child or young person would be incompatible with the provision of efficient education for others; or
- The attendance of the child or young person would be incompatible with the efficient use of resources.
The bar is high, none of the reason in your post seem enough to refuse to admit if the school is your preference and it isn’t wholly independent.
There just aren’t enough spaces
Full is not defined in law, and being ‘full’ is not enough of a reason to refuse admission, the LA have to prove the school is so full admitting DS is incompatible. The bar is high, higher than an “adverse effect”, “impact on” or “prejudicial to”.
Gunnersgold as much as I don’t think OP should deregister, EHE and EOTAS don’t have to be like lockdown learning!