After yet another thread where a poster has described symptoms that are red flags for cardiac events and YET ANOTHER poster has told them they're an expert and it'll be nothing - which it very well could be, but it might not - I'm beginning to think that it wouldn't be overreacting for MN to add 'Giving dangerous medical advice that could result in harm to a poster or family member' as a reason for banning posters.
I'm aware that this could be deemed a TAAT, but it's a serious matter that isn't confined to just one single occurrence. And I'll likely get mullered on here by the people who are so absolutely certain of their psychic abilities that they can't comprehend that their 'no, that symptom that is indicative of a heart attack/stroke/sepsis/cancer is just anxiety/menopause/a cold/need of moisturiser/a paracetamol' could lead to an unnecessary death or disability.
I think it's important enough to take any flak. MN can achieve great things, but can also be outright dangerous whilst it's seen as acceptable to do this.
If I'm coming on too strong here (obviously, I don't think I am), could MNHQ consider having a standard reply as they do for depression/self harm, don't offer money to sad stories or suchlike and have one for symptoms of chest pain, one for burns, etc?