@Elieza
Were Starbucks and other companies not getting away with paying practically no tax?
Something to do with offshore accounts and payments in dividends has helped many too I think.
Basically if you’re minted you can pay expensive accountants to legally do all they can to minimise your tax bills.
The regular people can’t do that.
Here is a very simple example (probably unlawful now but it gives the gist).
BigCo operates in the UK. It makes £30 million profit in year x.
(Say it operates in various other countries too)
BigCo's is owned by BigCo (San Serif) Ltd, a company incorporated in a little-known tropical islet.
Each year, BigCo (San Serif Ltd) charges BigCo a management fee. That fee is - guess what? - equal to BigCo's annual profits.
The result is that BigCo has no profits to tax, therefore no income tax to pay in the UK.
It will have income tax to pay in San Serif, but the rate there will be 0.001%.
Nothing actually happens on San Serif.
The point of the arrangement is to transfer profits from high-tax to low-tax jurisdictions.
It's very, very, very hard to prevent this sort of thing. I wince when I read some commentator or politician say "let's close all the tax loopholes and make everyone pay". At best it's whack-a-mole.
In my view we should be looking into relying on income tax and sales taxes less, and wealth taxes more (I don't mean CGT but an annual tax on wealth).