The farmers employ trained people to come in and shoot the foxes to keep the numbers down. Its cheaper and more efficient than operating a hunt
Agree. But shooting or lamping also carries the risk of gangrene and a long painful death over months, unless the marksmen are so skilled they never miss a shot. Same with snaring, gassing, poisoning foxes (I know some farmers resort to these methods) it often leaves foxes and other wildlife injured or ill rather than dead.
I’m still trying to mop up the tea I spilt from reading the post about farmers should capture, neuter and release foxes. I don’t think I need to explain why that won’t work?
Hunting has never been purely about fox control has it, unless a farmer identified a particular covert where a particular fox lived, (eg a fox that had a taste for killing livestock), and asked the hunt to put hounds into that place to dispatch it or flush it out.
Trail hunting (and I’m talking about genuine legal trail hunting here where no foxes are killed and hounds follow a scent, not the odd rogue hunt who use it as a disguise) mimics hunting yet he wants that banned too?
Trail hunting is a popular social sport in the country, the excitement and atmosphere of galloping and jumping alongside 40 other riders is something you can’t really re-create without the discipline and rules of an old-style hunt, even with a pack of bloodhounds who have never been trained to hunt fox or deer. The red coats exist to show the riders who the staff are (who to follow, who to listen to etc) or there’d be chaos. Don’t the cavalry and event horses go trail hunting as part of their training?