No one thinks a dog needs to have a psychology degree.
Fact is a rescue from another country is more than likely to have trauma. A dog can be beautifully placid but still have unpredictable reactions. Fil has a wonderful rescue greyhound. Very meek. Obedient. He's done a good job on her. However, she was mistreated. It's on her file. He knows a dog ultimately is a wolf and doesn't let her go around young children unless he's carefully controlling the situation.
And to anyone saying that therapy dogs don't need much training, well that's rather concerning. Everyone thinks their own dog is flawless, but many, many people are attacked by dogs each year. Dogs are animals and I would expect an animal used around children to have adequate training. The RSPCA don't even let a lot of dogs go to households with children in them, as they understand that however nice a dog is it is not a person. It is an animal with animal instincts.
And all that aside, no one has managed to explain why two dogs were needed, who just so happen to belong to the senior staff. It's abusing their position of power for their own gain. Did they offer the opportunity for all staff dogs to have this training? No of course not. How convenient the person with the power owns the perfect dog. What an amazing coincidence.
Ultimately a school is a place of learning and that's why we don't have random dogs, cats and budgies around the place. Usually, in a school all decisions are well planned with steps taken to make sure that learning is paramount.
The school is a workplace. Most workplaces do not have pets because they are distracting and can upset others. Any animal in a school needs proper provision and planning behind it. I've seen no evidence that this has happened in this case.
Will something happen? Probably not. But if it does I guarantee a child or another member of staff will have the blame pinned on them if it does