more "funny" is when people are questioning the troll opening poster on details (because their posts just dont add up) and are blocked bc of "troll hunting".
Troll opening posts are very inconsistent and when people ask obvious questions they are deemed as trolls instead of the opening poster. (I am sure Daily Mail correspondents do troll posts very often)
but as you said, its quite entertaining :)
and long entertaining threads are deleted bc of "to many agressive posts" or something.
The last good topic I read which was deleted was about a mum who invited her family to a pub celebration and was not happy with future DIL having 3 coctails :) It got like 900+ very balanced responses, it was very educational and yet, deleted.
One other post (about a guest who was invited to visit and then when wanted to bring a friend was charged for the stay) was "picked up" by some local newspaper.
It is interesting that troll opening posters are okey, but people asking any legit questions related to the opening post are deemed as troll hunters and are blocked.
If the troll opening poster wanted to do a research, for their column , wouldnt it be good to get some legit questions and reactions, to see the different sides and opinions? Or they do their "research" to get a specific result (so they can refer to the MN reactions and quote only what is supporting their initial quest?)
I wonder....