The unspoken truth is that because of a poorly functioning jobs market (lots of short term work for people who want more permanent), lack of true social mobility, and above all a reasonably high cost of living, the only way for some Brits to feel "wealthy" is through some connection to owning property. Governments know it makes core voters feel good to see the most emotional of investments rise in value. Whether it's through the unearned proceeds made through sale, or it's the ownership of multiple properties, housing in the U.K. has gone from being a resource to an asset class.
The other unspoken truth is that is is an asset class which makes certain people who have no understanding of markets and investment feel very clever indeed. "You can't go wrong with bricks and mortar" can only be true if successive governments prop up this asset bubble for fear of normal market correction.
"My house has made me £XX,000 in 5 years" - how often have we heard this statement? (Cue a slew of people saying "I've never heard anyone say that"
) Despite the fact this is unearned wealth, and only realisable either at point of sale, or equity release etc - but no, the house is actually "making" money for that person.
Let's face it. British voters, the ones who feel like political shareholders with a stake in society, like rising house prices. For many it's their pension plan: for millions of people it's their asset fund to pass onto their DCs.
Which government is going to pop this entire bubble of being, this shared vision of "wealth"? It's so ingrained in society and I think plenty of people on here subscribe to this view also.
(Disclaimer: I own a single property in Surrey. I am not bitter. I am making observations about society, not casting envious glances. I like where I live.)