@Silliantro - if you are still reading, perhaps a better way to look at it : lockdowns, restrictions and social distancing rules require the vast majority of people to sign up for it. The police can't deal with mass ignoring of the rules (by that, I dont mean a protest, but say 70% of households ignoring the rules, 50% of shops not bothering with any restrictions).
What is essential is for the majority of people for whom covid 19 will be no worse than a bad cold, to agree what they are being asked to give up is worth it for protecting random strangers.
A holiday isn't essential as such, but if its a line that large numbers are saying "no, I won't give up that", then its essential to make it happen rather than face losing the cooperation of the majority.
I've reached the point where I will follow any rule I have no choice to follow, but I dont care and I dont want to anymore. I dont want to sacrifice anything for strangers. I dont want to cancel parties or holidays or nights out or anything to help someone else anymore.
It is essential the government convinces me and others than not letting us travel is essential to stop the NHS collapsing. Anything less than that doesn't seem the sacrifice is essential.
There are too many people who seem to think the government should have the right to decide what im allowed to do. Not have to justify everything they are not letting me do. The default position should not be "no", but "your choice unless there's a proven need to say no".
I see no need for travel to be banned once we've tipped past 75% of adults vaccinated. There might be a case to ban travel to certain countries, or certain regions of some countries, but a flat ban is not justified.